A review on dynamic membrane filtration: Materials, applications and future perspectives

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 122, Issue , 2012, Pages 196-206

  Ersahin, Mustafa Evren ^a,b   Ozgun, Hale ^a,b   Dereli, Recep Kaan ^a,b   Ozturk, Izzet ^b   Roest, Kees ^c   van Lier, Jules B ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c KWR WATERCYCLE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cake layer; Dynamic filtration; Dynamic membrane; Membrane bioreactor; Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL WASTE WATER TREATMENT; CAKE LAYER; CAPITAL COSTS; COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION; CRITICAL APPROACH; CURRENT STATUS; DYNAMIC FILTRATION; DYNAMIC MEMBRANES; FILTRATION SYSTEMS; FUTURE PERSPECTIVES; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE; ON DYNAMICS; PHYSICAL BARRIERS;

BIOREACTORS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

MICROFILTRATION;

DISSOLVED ORGANIC MATTER; ORGANIC CARBON;

BIOFOULING; BIOREACTOR; FILTRATION; LITERATURE REVIEW; MEMBRANE; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

AEROBIC REACTOR; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOREACTOR EQUIPMENT; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DYNAMIC MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; MATERIALS; MEMBRANE FILTER; MEMBRANE REACTOR; NANOFILTRATION; PERMEABILITY BARRIER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SLUDGE; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; FILTRATION; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; SEWAGE; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 84866007918     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.086     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Ahmed Z., Cho J., Lim B.R., Song K.G., Ahn K.H. Effects of sludge retention time on membrane fouling and microbial community structure in a membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 287(2):211-218.
2. Al-Malack M.H., Anderson G.K. Formation of dynamic membranes with crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 112:287-296.
3. Al-Malack M.H., Anderson G.K. Crossflow microfiltration with dynamic membranes. Water Res. 1997, 31(8):1969-1979.
4. Al-Malack M.H., Anderson G.K. Cleaning techniques of dynamic membranes. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1997, 12:25-33.
5. Al-Malack M.H., Anderson G.K., Almasi A. Treatment of anoxic pond effluent using crossflow microfiltration. Water Res. 1998, 32(12):3738-3746.
6. Alavi Moghaddam M.R., Satoh H., Mino T. Effect of important operational parameters on performance of coarse pore filtration activated sludge process. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 46(9):229-236.
7. Altman M., Semiat R., Hasson D. Removal of organic foulants from feed waters by dynamic membranes. Desalination 1999, 125:65-75.
8. An Y., Wang Z., Wu Z., Yang D., Zhou Q. Characterization of membrane foulants in an anaerobic non-woven fabric membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 155:709-715.
9. Brady-Estevez A.S., Kang S., Elimelech M. A single-walled carbon nanotube filter for removal of viral and bacterial pathogens. Small 2008, 4:481-484.
10. 2 membrane. Desalination 2000, 128:247-256.
11. Cao D.W., Chu H.Q., Jin W., Dong B.Z. Characteristics of the biodiatomite dynamic membrane (cake layer) for municipal wastewater treatment. Desalination 2010, 250:544-547.
12. Chen C.C., Chiang B.H. Formation and characteristics of zirconium ultrafiltration dynamic membranes of various pore sizes. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 143:65-73.
13. Chu H.Q., Cao D., Jin W., Dong B.Z. Characteristics of bio-diatomite dynamic membrane process for municipal wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:271-276.
14. Chu L., Li S. Filtration capability and operational characteristics of dynamic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 51:173-179.
15. Diaper C., Stephenson T., Judd S.J. Influence of configuration and substrate on the properties of dynamically formed membranes. Water Sci. Technol. 1996, 34(9):255-260.
16. Fan B., Huang X. Characteristics of a self-forming dynamic membrane coupled with a bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:5245-5251.
17. Freilich D., Tanny G.B. The formation mechanism of dynamic hydrous Zr(IV) oxide membrane on microporous supports. J. Colloid Int. Sci. 1978, 64:362-370.
18. Fuchs W., Resch C., Kernstock M., Mayer M., Scoeberl P., Braun R. Influence of operational conditions on the performance of a mesh filter activated sludge process. Water Res. 2005, 39(4):803-810.
19. Gaddis J.L., Spencer H.G., Wilson S.C. Separation of materials in dye manufacturing process effluent by hyperfiltration. AICHE Symp. Ser. 1979, 75(190):156-161.
20. Groves G.R., Buckley C.A., Cox J.M., Kirk A., MacMillan C.D., Simpson M.J. Dynamic membrane ultrafiltration for the treatment of industrial effluents for water reuse. Desalination 1983, 47:305-312.
21. Ho J.H., Khanal S.K., Sung S. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor for treatment of synthetic municipal wastewater at ambient temperature. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 55(7):79-86.
22. 2 photocatalytic oxidation and non-woven membrane filtration hybrid system for degradation of 4-chlorophenol. Desalination 2009, 245. 619-182.
23. Hutten I.M. Handbook of Non-Woven Filter Media 2007, Elsevier, UK.
24. Hwang K.Y., Cheng Y.H. The role of dynamic membrane in cross-flow microfiltration of macromolecules. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2003, 38(4):779-795.
25. Igawa M., Seno M., Takabashi A., Yamabe T. Reverse osmosis by dynamic membranes. Desalination 1977, 22:281-289.
26. Ip, A.W.C., 2005. Dynamic membranes formation and characterisation studies, Ph.D. Thesis, UNESCO Centre for Membrane Science and Technology, The University of New South Wales.
27. Jeison D., van Lier J.B. Thermophilic treatment of acidified and partially acidified wastewater using an anaerobic submerged MBR: factors affecting long-term operational flux. Water Res. 2007, 41:3868-3879.
28. Jeison D., van Lier J.B. Cake formation and consolidation: main factors governing the applicable flux in anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactors (AnSMBR) treating acidified wastewaters. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 56:71-78.
29. Jeison D., Diaz I., van Lier J.B. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors: are membranes really necessary?. Electron. J. Biotech. 2008, 11(4):1-7.
30. Jiraratananon R., Uttapap D., Tangamornsuksun C. Self-forming dynamic membrane for ultrafiltration of pineapple juice. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 129:135-143.
31. Johnson J.S., Minturn R.E., Wadia P.H. Hyperfiltration. XXI. Dynamically formed hydrous Zr(IV) oxide-polyacrylate membranes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1972, 37:267-281.
32. Judd S. The MBR Book Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors in Water and Wastewater Treatment 2006, Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
33. Kishihara S., Tamaki H., Fuji S., Komoto M. Clarification of sugar solution through a dynamic membrane formed on a porous ceramic tube. J. Membr. Sci. 1984, 41:103-114.
34. Kiso Y., Jung Y.J., Ichinari T., Park M., Kitao T., Nishimura K., Min K.S. Wastewater treatment performance of a filtration bio-reactor equipped with a mesh as a filter material. Water Res. 2000, 34(17):4143-4150.
35. Kiso Y., Jung Y.J., Min K.S., Wang W., Simase M., Yamada T., Min K.S. Coupling of sequencing batch reactor and mesh filtration: operational parameters and wastewater treatment performance. Water Res. 2005, 39:4887-4898.
36. Knyazkova T.V., Kavitskaya A.A. Improved performance of reverse osmosis with dynamic layers onto membranes in separation of concentrated salt solutions. Desalination 2000, 131:129-136.
37. Kryvoruchko A.P., Atamanenko I.D., Yurlova L.Y. Concentration/purification of Co(II) ions by reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration combined with sorption on clay mineral montmorillonite and cation-exchange resin KU-2-8n. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 228:77-81.
38. Lee J., Ahn W.Y., Lee C.H. Comparison of the filtration characteristics between attached and suspended growth microorganisms in submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 2001, 35(10):2435-2445.
39. Li F., Chen J., Deng C. The kinetics of crossflow dynamic membrane bioreactor. Water SA 2006, 32(2):199-203.
40. Liu H., Yang C., Pu W., Zhang J. Formation mechanism and structure of dynamic membrane in the dynamic membrane bioreactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 148:1290-1295.
41. Marcinkowsky A.E., Kraus K.A., Phillips H.O., Johnson J.S., Shor A.J. Hyperfiltration studies IV. Salt rejection by dynamically formed hydrous oxide membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88(24):5744-5750.
42. Matsuyama H., Shimomura T., Teramoto M. Formation and characteristics of dynamic membrane for ultrafiltration of protein in binary protein system. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 92:107-115.
43. Na L., Zhongzhou L., Shuguang X. Dynamically formed poly (vinyl alcohol) ultrafiltration membranes with good anti-fouling characteristics. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 169:17-28.
44. Nakao S., Nomura T., Kimura S., Watanabe A. Formation and characteristics of inorganic dynamic membranes for ultrafiltration. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1986, 19(3):221-226.
45. Noor M.J.M.M., Ahmadun F.R., Mohamed T.A., Muyibi S.A., Pescod M.B. Performance of flexible membrane using kaolin dynamic membrane in treating domestic wastewater. Desalination 2002, 147:263-268.
46. Ohtani T., Nakajima M., Nawa Y., Watanabe A. Formation of dynamic UF membrane with fine Zr particles. J. Membr. Sci. 1991, 64:273-281.
47. Park M.S., Kiso Y., Jung Y.J., Simase M., Wang W.H., Kitao T., Min K.S. Sludge thickening performance of mesh filtration process. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 50(8):125-133.
48. Pillay V.L., Townsend C.A., Buckley C.A. Improving the performance of anaerobic digesters at wastewater treatment works: the coupled cross-flow microfiltration/digester process. Water Sci. Technol. 1994, 30(12):329-337.
49. Ren X., Shon H.K., Jang N., Lee Y.G., Bae M., Lee J., Cho K., Kim I.S. Novel membrane bioreactor (MBR) coupled with a non-woven fabric filter for household wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2010, 44:751-760.
50. Rumyantsev M., Shauly A., Yiantsios S., Hasson D., Karabelas A., Semiat R. Parameters affecting the properties of dynamic membranes formed by Zr hydroxide colloids. Desalination 2000, 131:189-200.
51. Sano D., Ueki Y., Watanabe T., Omura T. Membrane separation of indigenous noroviruses from sewage sludge and treated wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 54(3):77-82.
52. Satyawali Y., Balakrishnan M. Treatment of distillery effluent in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) equipped with mesh filter. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63:278-286.
53. Seo G.T., Moon B.H., Park Y.M., Kim S.H. Filtration characteristics of immersed coarse pore filters in an activated sludge system for domestic wastewater reclamation. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 55(1-2):51-58.
54. Seo G.T., Moon B.H., Lee T.S., Lim T.J., Kim I.S. Non-woven fabric filter separation activated sludge reactor for domestic wastewater reclamation. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 47(1):133-138.
55. Sharp M.M., Escobar I.C. Effects of dynamic or secondary-layer coagulation on ultrafiltration. Desalination 2006, 186:239-249.
56. Shor A.J., Kraus K.A., Smith W.T., Johnson J.S. Hyperfiltration studies. XI. Salt-rejection properties of dynamically formed hydrous zirconium(IV) oxide membranes. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 72(6):2200-2206.
57. Sima L.C., Schaeffer J., Le Saux J.C., Parnaudeau S., Elimelech M., Le Guyader F.S. Calicivirus removal in a membrane bioreactor wastewater treatment plant. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77(15):5170-5177.
58. Srivastava A., Srivastava O.N., Talapatra S., Vajtai R., Ajayan P.M. Carbon nanotube filters. Nat. Mater. 2004, 3:610-614.
59. Tanny G.B., Johnson J.S. The structure of hydrous Zr(IV) oxide-polyacrylate membranes: poly(acrylic acid) deposition. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1978, 22:289-297.
60. Tien C.J., Chiang B.H. Immobilization of α-amylase on a zirconium dynamic membrane. Process Biochem. 1999, 35:377-383.
61. Townsend R.B., Crawdron M.P.R., Neytzell F.G., Buckley C.A. The potential of dynamic membranes for the treatment of industrial effluents. ChemSA 1989, 15(4):132-134.
62. Tsapiuk E.A. Ultrafiltration separation of aqueous solutions of poly(ethylene glycol)s on the dynamic membrane formed by gelatin. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 116:17-29.
63. Turkson A.K., Mikhlin J.A., Weber M.E. Dynamic membranes. Part I. Determination of optimum formation conditions and electrofiltration of serum albumin with a rotating module. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1989, 24:1261-1291.
64. Waeger F., Delhaye T., Fuchs W. The use of ceramic microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes for particle removal from anaerobic digester effluents. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 73:271-278.
65. Walker M., Banks C.J., Heaven S. Development of a coarse membrane bioreactor for two-stage anaerobic digestion of biodegradable municipal solid waste. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59(4):729-735.
66. Wang J.Y., Chou K.S., Lee C.J. Dead-end flow filtration of solid suspension in polymer fluid through an active kaolin dynamic membrane. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1998, 33(16):2513-2529.
67. Wang J.Y., Liu M.C., Lee C.J., Chou K.S. Formation of dextran-Zr dynamic membrane and study on concentration of protein hemoglobin solution. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 162:45-55.
68. Wang W., Jung Y.J., Kiso Y., Yamada T., Min K.S. Excess sludge reduction performance of an aerobic SBR process equipped with a submerged mesh filter unit. Process Biochem. 2006, 41:745-751.
69. Wang X.F., Chen X.M., Yoon K., Fang D.F., Hsiao B.S., Chu B. High flux filtration medium based on nanofibrous substrate with hydrophilic nanocomposite coating. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39(19):7684-7691.
70. Wang X.M., Li X.Y., Huang X. Membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR): characterisation of the sludge cake and its high filtration resistance. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 52(3):439-445.
71. Wu Y., Huang X., Wen X., Chen F. Function of dynamic membrane in self-forming dynamic membrane coupled bioreactor. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 51(6-7):107-114.
72. Yamagiwa K., Oohira Y., Ohkawa A. Performance evaluation of a plunging liquid jet bioreactor with crossflow filtration for small-scale treatment of domestic wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 1994, 50(2):131-138.
73. 2 bi-layer composite dynamic membrane for oily wastewater treatment: effect of solution conditions. Desalination 2011, 270:50-56.
74. Ye M., Zhang H., Wei Q., Lei H., Yang F., Zhang X. Study on the suitable thickness of a pac-pre-coated dynamic membrane coupled with a bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Desalination 2006, 194:108-120.
75. Zhang X., Wang Z., Wu Z., Lu F., Tong J., Zang L. Formation of dynamic membrane in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 165:175-183.
76. Zhang X., Wang Z., Wu Z., Wei T., Lu F., Tong J., Mai S. Membrane fouling in an anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor (AnDMBR) for municipal wastewater treatment: characteristics of membrane foulants and bulk sludge. Process Biochem. 2011, 46:1538-1544.
77. Zhao Y., Tan Y., Wong F.S., Fane A.G., Xu N. Formation of dynamic membranes for oily water separation by crossflow filtration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 44:212-220.
78. 2 dynamic membranes for oily water separation: effects of operating conditions. Desalination 2006, 191:344-350.
79. Zhi-Guo M., Feng-lin Y., Xing-wen Z. MBR Focus: do non-wovens offer a cheaper option?. Filtr. Sep. 2005, 42(5):28-30.