Multilevel analysis or analysis of variance? A simulation based comparison ofmethods for analyzing experiments in school settings;Mehrebenenanalyse oder Varianzanalyse? Ein simulationsbasierter Vergleich von Verfahren zur Auswertung pädagogisch-psychologischer Experimente

Zeitschrift fur Entwicklungspsychologie und Padagogische Psychologie

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 199-209

  Schoppek, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

Author keywords

ANOVA; Comparison of methods; Hierarchical linear modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947066871     PISSN: 00498637     EISSN: 21906262     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0049-8637/a000136     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bates, D., Maechler, M. & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: Linear mixed- effects models using S4 classes (R package version 0.999999-0). Retrieved September 8, 2015, from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Fyfe, E. R., Rittle-Johnson, B. & DeCaro, M. S. (2012). The effects of feedback during exploratory mathematics problem solving: Prior knowledge matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1094-1108.
4. Graubard, B. I. & Korn, E. L. (1994). Regression analysis with clustered data. Statistics in Medicine, 13, 509-522.
5. Hopkins, K. D. (1982). The unit of analysis: Group means versus individual observations. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 5-18.
6. Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
7. Judd, C. M., Ryan, C. S. & McClelland, G. H. (2009). Data analysis: A model comparison approach (2nd ed.). New York, Hove: Routledge.
8. Kish, L. (1965). Survey Sampling. New York: Wiley.
9. Korendijk, E. J. H., Maas, C. J. M., Moerbeek, M. & Van der Heijden, P. G. M. (2008). The Influence of misspecification of the heteroscedasticity on multilevel regression parameter and standard error estimates. Methodology, 4, 67-72.
10. Kreft, I.&Leeuw, J. de (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
11. Lenhard, W., Baier, H., Endlich, D., Lenhard, A., Schneider, W. & Hoffmann, J. (2012). Computerunterstützte Leseverstandnisförderung: Die Effekte automatisch generierter Rückmeldungen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 26, 135-148.
12. Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T. & Muthen, B. (2008). The Multilevel Latent Covariate Model: A New, More Reliable Approach to Group-Level Effects in Contextual Studies. Psychological Methods, 13, 203-229.
13. Maas, C. J. M. & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86-92.
14. Marx, E. & Keller, K. (2010). Effekte eines induktiven Denktrainings auf die Denk- und Sprachentwicklung bei Vorschulkindern und Erstklässlern in benachteiligten Stadtteilen. Zeitschrift fürPädagogische Psychologie, 24, 139-146.
15. Mouratidis, A. A., Vansteenkiste, M., Sideridis, G. & Lens, W. (2011).Vitality and interest-enjoyment as a function of classto- class variation in need-supportive teaching and pupils' autonomous motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 353-366.
16. Paccagnella, O. (2011). Sample Size and Accuracy of Estimates in Multilevel Models: New Simulation Results. Methodology, 7, 111-120.
17. Pulfrey, C., Buchs, C.&Butera, F. (2011). Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 683-700.
18. R Core Team (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Wien: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Retrieved September 8, 2015, from http://www.R-project.org/.
19. Raudenbush, S. W. & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Rohwer, G. & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2012). Contextual and random coefficient multilevel models. A comparison. NEPSWorking Paper No. 6 (NEPS Working Papers). Bamberg.
21. Schoppek, W. (2012). Dynamic task selection in learning arithmetic: The role of learner control and adaption based on a hierarchy of skills. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 26, 43-55.
22. Schroeder, S. (2011). What readers have and do: Effects of students' verbal ability and reading time components on comprehension with and without text availability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 877-896.
23. Schwartz, D. L., Chase, C. C., Oppezzo, M. A. & Chin, D. B. (2011). Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases: The effects of telling first on learning and transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 759-775.
24. Searle, S. R. (1971). Topics in variance component estimation. Biometrics, 27, 1-76.
25. Searle, S. R., Casella, G. & McCulloch, C. E. (1992). Variance Components. New York, NY: Wiley.
26. Snijders, T. A. B. & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis (2nd edition). London: Sage.
27. Swanson, H. L., Orosco, M. J., Lussier, C. M., Gerber,M. M. & Guzman-Orth, D. A. (2011). The influence of working memory and phonological processing on English language learner children's bilingual reading and language acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 838-856.
28. Wald, A. (1943). Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 54, 426-482.