A simplified model for dark matter interacting primarily with gluons

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1-15

  Godbole, Rohini M ^a   Mendiratta, Gaurav ^a,b   Tait, Tim M P ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Hadronic Colliders; Phenomenological Models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947066424     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2015)064     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept.405 (2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175] [INSPIRE].
2. LHC New Physics Working Group collaboration, D. Alves, Simplified Models for LHC New Physics Searches, J. Phys.G 39 (2012) 105005 [arXiv:1105.2838] [INSPIRE].
3. ′o searches, Phys. Rev.D 78 (2008) 095002 [arXiv:0809.2849] [INSPIRE].
4. Y. Bai, P.J. Fox and R. Harnik, The Tevatron at the Frontier of Dark Matter Direct Detection, JHEP12 (2010) 048 [arXiv:1005.3797] [INSPIRE].
5. S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson and M. Luty, Effective WIMPs, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 015011 [arXiv:1307.8120] [INSPIRE].
6. Y. Bai and J. Berger, Fermion Portal Dark Matter, JHEP11 (2013) 171 [arXiv:1308.0612] [INSPIRE].
7. H. An, L.-T. Wang and H. Zhang, Dark matter with t-channel mediator: a simple step beyond contact interaction, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 115014 [arXiv:1308.0592] [INSPIRE].
8. A. DiFranzo, K.I. Nagao, A. Rajaraman and T.M.P. Tait, Simplified Models for Dark Matter Interacting with Quarks, JHEP11 (2013) 014 [Erratum ibid.1401 (2014) 162] [arXiv:1308.2679] [INSPIRE].
9. M. Garny, A. Ibarra, S. Rydbeck and S. Vogl, Majorana Dark Matter with a Coloured Mediator: Collider vs Direct and Indirect Searches, JHEP06 (2014) 169 [arXiv:1403.4634] [INSPIRE].
10. M. Papucci, A. Vichi and K.M. Zurek, Monojet versus the rest of the world I: t-channel models, JHEP11 (2014) 024 [arXiv:1402.2285] [INSPIRE].
11. P. Harris, V.V. Khoze, M. Spannowsky and C. Williams, Constraining Dark Sectors at Colliders: Beyond the Effective Theory Approach, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 055009 [arXiv:1411.0535] [INSPIRE].
12. J. Abdallah et al., Simplified Models for Dark Matter and Missing Energy Searches at the LHC, arXiv:1409.2893 [INSPIRE].
13. S. Malik et al., Interplay and Characterization of Dark Matter Searches at Colliders and in Direct Detection Experiments, arXiv:1409.4075 [INSPIRE].
14. S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson and M. Luty, Leptophilic Effective WIMPs, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 015011 [arXiv:1402.7358] [INSPIRE].
15. Y. Bai and J. Berger, Lepton Portal Dark Matter, JHEP08 (2014) 153 [arXiv:1402.6696] [INSPIRE].
16. M. Garny, A. Ibarra and S. Vogl, Signatures of Majorana dark matter with t-channel mediators, Int. J. Mod. Phys.D 24 (2015) 1530019 [arXiv:1503.01500] [INSPIRE].
17. R. Harnik and G.D. Kribs, An Effective Theory of Dirac Dark Matter, Phys. Rev.D 79 (2009) 095007 [arXiv:0810.5557] [INSPIRE].
18. Q.-H. Cao, C.-R. Chen, C.S. Li and H. Zhang, Effective Dark Matter Model: Relic density, CDMS II, Fermi LAT and LHC, JHEP08 (2011) 018 [arXiv:0912.4511] [INSPIRE].
19. M. Beltrán, D. Hooper, E.W. Kolb and Z.C. Krusberg, Deducing the nature of dark matter from direct and indirect detection experiments in the absence of collider signatures of new physics, Phys. Rev.D 80 (2009) 043509 [arXiv:0808.3384] [INSPIRE].
20. M. Beltrán, D. Hooper, E.W. Kolb, Z.A.C. Krusberg and T.M.P. Tait, Maverick dark matter at colliders, JHEP09 (2010) 037 [arXiv:1002.4137] [INSPIRE].
21. J. Goodman, M. Ibe, A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T.M.P. Tait and H.-B. Yu, Constraints on Light Majorana dark Matter from Colliders, Phys. Lett.B 695 (2011) 185 [arXiv:1005.1286] [INSPIRE].
22. J. Goodman, M. Ibe, A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T.M.P. Tait and H.-B. Yu, Constraints on Dark Matter from Colliders, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 116010 [arXiv:1008.1783] [INSPIRE].
23. E. Dudas, L. Heurtier, Y. Mambrini and B. Zaldivar, Extra U(1), effective operators, anomalies and dark matter, JHEP11 (2013) 083 [arXiv:1307.0005] [INSPIRE].
24. S. Baek, P. Ko and W.-I. Park, Search for the Higgs portal to a singlet fermionic dark matter at the LHC, JHEP02 (2012) 047 [arXiv:1112.1847] [INSPIRE].
25. R.C. Cotta, A. Rajaraman, T.M.P. Tait and A.M. Wijangco, Particle Physics Implications and Constraints on Dark Matter Interpretations of the CDMS Signal, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 013020 [arXiv:1305.6609] [INSPIRE].
26. S. Baek, P. Ko and W.-I. Park, Invisible Higgs Decay Width vs. Dark Matter Direct Detection Cross Section in Higgs Portal Dark Matter Models, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 055014 [arXiv:1405.3530] [INSPIRE].
27. M. Abdullah, A. DiFranzo, A. Rajaraman, T.M.P. Tait, P. Tanedo and A.M. Wijangco, Hidden on-shell mediators for the Galactic Center γ-ray excess, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 035004 [arXiv:1404.6528] [INSPIRE].
28. M.R. Buckley, D. Feld and D. Goncalves, Scalar Simplified Models for Dark Matter, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 015017 [arXiv:1410.6497] [INSPIRE].
29. T. Cohen, J. Kearney, A. Pierce and D. Tucker-Smith, Singlet-Doublet Dark Matter, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 075003 [arXiv:1109.2604] [INSPIRE].
30. A. Dedes and D. Karamitros, Doublet-Triplet Fermionic Dark Matter, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 115002 [arXiv:1403.7744] [INSPIRE].
31. C.P. Burgess, M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, The Minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: A Singlet scalar, Nucl. Phys.B 619 (2001) 709 [hep-ph/0011335] [INSPIRE].
32. J.M. Arnold, M. Pospelov, M. Trott and M.B. Wise, Scalar Representations and Minimal Flavor Violation, JHEP01 (2010) 073 [arXiv:0911.2225] [INSPIRE].
33. T. Yamagata, Y. Takamori and H. Utsunomiya, Search for anomalously heavy hydrogen in deep sea water at 4000-m, Phys. Rev.D 47 (1993) 1231 [INSPIRE].
34. A.J. Buras, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, S. Jager and L. Silvestrini, Universal unitarity triangle and physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Lett.B 500 (2001) 161 [hep-ph/0007085] [INSPIRE].
35. G. D’Ambrosio, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: An Effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys.B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036] [INSPIRE].
36. −in the Weinberg Model, Nucl. Phys.B 160 (1979) 151 [INSPIRE].
37. G. Steigman, B. Dasgupta and J.F. Beacom, Precise Relic WIMP Abundance and its Impact on Searches for Dark Matter Annihilation, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 023506 [arXiv:1204.3622] [INSPIRE].
38. R.J. Hill and M.P. Solon, Standard Model anatomy of WIMP dark matter direct detection II: QCD analysis and hadronic matrix elements, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 043505 [arXiv:1409.8290] [INSPIRE].
39. LUX collaboration, C. Faham, First Dark Matter Search Results from the Large Underground Xenon (LUX) Experiment, arXiv:1405.5906 [INSPIRE].
40. CMS collaboration, Search for dark matter, extra dimensions and unparticles in monojet events in proton-proton collisions at (Formula presented.) TeV, Eur. Phys. J.C 75 (2015) 235 [arXiv:1408.3583] [INSPIRE].
41. ATLAS collaboration, Search for new phenomena in final states with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at (Formula presented.) TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J.C 75 (2015) 299 [arXiv:1502.01518] [INSPIRE].
42. M. Chala, F. Kahlhoefer, M. McCullough, G. Nardini and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Constraining Dark Sectors with Monojets and Dijets, JHEP07 (2015) 089 [arXiv:1503.05916] [INSPIRE].
43. CMS collaboration, Search for pair-produced resonances decaying to jet pairs in proton-proton collisions at (Formula presented.) TeV, Phys. Lett.B 747 (2015) 98 [arXiv:1412.7706] [INSPIRE].
44. ATLAS collaboration, Searches for heavy long-lived charged particles with the ATLAS detector in proton-proton collisions at (Formula presented.) TeV, JHEP01 (2015) 068 [arXiv:1411.6795] [INSPIRE].
45. CMS collaboration, Search for decays of stopped long-lived particles produced in proton-proton collisions at (Formula presented.) TeV, Eur. Phys. J.C 75 (2015) 151 [arXiv:1501.05603] [INSPIRE].
46. B.A. Dobrescu and F. Yu, Coupling-mass mapping of dijet peak searches, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 035021 [arXiv:1306.2629] [INSPIRE].
47. ATLAS collaboration, Search for New Particles in Two-Jet Final States in 7 TeV Proton-Proton Collisions with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.105 (2010) 161801 [arXiv:1008.2461] [INSPIRE].
48. CMS collaboration, Search for Dijet Resonances in 7 TeV pp Collisions at CMS, Phys. Rev. Lett.105 (2010) 211801 [arXiv:1010.0203] [INSPIRE].
49. ATLAS collaboration, Search for new phenomena in the dijet mass distribution using p − p collision data at (Formula presented.) TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 052007 [arXiv:1407.1376] [INSPIRE].
50. CMS collaboration, Search for resonances and quantum black holes using dijet mass spectra in proton-proton collisions at (Formula presented.) TeV, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 052009 [arXiv:1501.04198] [INSPIRE].
51. CMS collaboration, Search for pair production of resonances decaying to a top quark plus a jet in final states with two leptons, CMS-PAS-B2G-12-008 (2013).
52. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the (Formula presented.) production cross section in pp collisions at (Formula presented.) TeV with lepton + jets final states, Phys. Lett.B 720 (2013) 83 [arXiv:1212.6682] [INSPIRE].
53. CMS collaboration, Combination of ATLAS and CMS top-quark pair cross-section measurements using proton-proton collisions at (Formula presented.) TeV, CMS-PAS-TOP-14-016 (2014).
54. J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
55. D. Gonçalves-Netto, D. López-Val, K. Mawatari, T. Plehn and I. Wigmore, Automated Squark and Gluino Production to Next-to-Leading Order, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 014002 [arXiv:1211.0286] [INSPIRE].
56. ATLAS collaboration, Search for resonant top plus jet production in (Formula presented.) + jets events with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at (Formula presented.) TeV, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 091103 [arXiv:1209.6593] [INSPIRE].
57. CMS collaboration, Search for charge-asymmetric production of W ’ bosons in top pair + jet events from pp collisions at (Formula presented.) TeV, Phys. Lett.B 717 (2012) 351 [arXiv:1206.3921] [INSPIRE].