Rapid fluid administration and the incidence of hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia and ephedrine requirement: The effect of crystalloid versus colloid coloading

Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 273-281

  Unlugenc, Hakki ^a   Turktan, Mediha ^a   Evruke, Ismail Cuneyt ^b   Gunduz, Murat ^a   Burgut, Refik ^c   Yapicioglu Yildizdas, Hacer ^d   Isik, Geylan ^a  

^a CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Obstetrics and Gynecology   (Turkey)

^c Bioistatistics   (Turkey)

^d Paediatrics and Neonatology   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Anesthetic techniques subarachnoid; Fluid therapy; Fluids iv; Pharmacology agonists adrenergic

Indexed keywords

EPHEDRINE; HETASTARCH DERIVATIVE; ISOTONIC SOLUTION; RINGER'S LACTATE;

ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CESAREAN SECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INCIDENCE; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINAL ANESTHESIA;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; CESAREAN SECTION; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EPHEDRINE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYDROXYETHYL STARCH DERIVATIVES; HYPOTENSION; INCIDENCE; ISOTONIC SOLUTIONS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84947056334     PISSN: 05440440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Veeser M, Hofmann T, Roth R, Klöhr S, Rossaint R, Heesen M: Vasopressors for the management of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012, 56:8106.
2. Langeseter E, Rosseland LA, Stubhaug A: Continuous invasive blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring during cesarean delivery: a randomized, double-blind comparison of low-dose versus high-dose spinal anesthesia with intravenous phenylephrine or placebo infusion. Anesthesiology; 2008, 109:856-63.
3. Dyer RA, Reed AR, Van Dyk D, et al: Hemodynamic effects of ephedrine, phenylephrine, and the coadministration of phenylephrine with oxytocin during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology; 2009, 111:753-65.
4. Dyer RA, Farina Z, Joubert IA, et al: Crystalloid preload versus rapid crystalloid administration after induction of spinal Anesthesia (coload) for elective cesarean section. Anaesth Intensive Care; 2004, 32:351-7.
5. Mojica JL, Melendez HJ, Bautista LE: The timing of intravenous crystalloid administration and incidence of cardiovascular side effects during spinal anesthesia: the results from a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg; 2002, 94:432-7.
6. Lobo DN, Macafee DA, Allison SP: How perioperative fluid balance influences postoperative outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2006, 20:439-55.
7. Arkilic CF, Taguchi A, Sharma N, et al: Supplemental perioperative fluid administration increases tissue oxygen pressure. Surgery; 2003, 133:49-55.
8. Montoya BH, Oliveros CI, Moreno DA: Managing hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Rev Col Anest; Mayo-Julio 2009, Vol. 37 - No. 2:131-140.
9. Reidy J, Douglas J: Vasopressors in obstetrics. Anesthesiol Clin; 2008, (26):75-88.
10. Hahn RG: Volume kinetics for infusion fluids. Anesthesiology; 2010, 113:470-81.
11. Sear JW: Kidney dysfunction in the postoperative period. Br J Anaesth; 2005, 95:20-32.
12. Pouta AM, Karinen J, Vuolteenaho OJ, Laatikainen TJ: Effect of intravenous fluid preload on vasoactive peptide secretion during Cesarean section under spinal Anesthesia. Anesthesia; 1996, 51:12832.
13. Cyna AM, Andrew M, Emmett RS, Middleton P, Simmons SW: Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal Anesthesia for cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Oct 18, (4):CD002251.
14. Siddik-Sayyid SM, Nasr VG, Taha SK, et al: A randomized trial comparing colloid preload to coload during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg; 2009, 109:1219-24.
15. Rout CC, Akoojee SS, Rocke DA: Rapid administration of crystalloid preload does not decrease the incidence of hypotension after spinal Anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Br J Anaesth; 1992, 68:394-7.
16. Sharma S, Sidawi E, Gambling D, et al: Hetastarch versus lactated Ringer’s preload: prevention of hypotension following spinal anesthesia [abstract]. Anesth Analg; 1995, 80 (Suppl):431.
17. Zorko N, Kamenik M, Starc V: The effect of Trendelenburg position, lactated Ringer’s solution and 6% hydroxyethyl starch solution on cardiac output after spinal anesthesia.. Anesth Analg; 2009, 108:6559.
18. Kamenik M, Paver-Erzen V: The effects of lactated Ringer’s solution infusion on cardiac output changes after spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg; 2001, 92:710-4.
19. Riley ET: Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean delivery: keep the pressure up and don’t spare the vasoconstrictors. Br J Anaesth; 2004, 92:45961. Erratum in: Br J Anaesth; 2004, 92:782.
20. Lirk P, Haller I, Wong CA: Management of spinal Anesthesiainduced hypotension for cesarean delivery: a European survey. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012, 29:452-3.
21. Allen TK, Muir HA, George RB, Habib AS: A survey of the management of spinal-induced hypotension for scheduled cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth; 2009, 18:356-61.
22. Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF: Comparison of phenylephrine infusion regimens for maintaining maternal blood pressure during spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean section. Br J Anaesth; 2004, 92:469-74.