A randomized and controlled study of noninvasive hemodynamicmonitoring as a guide to drug treatment of uncontrolled hypertensive patients

Journal of Hypertension

Volumn 33, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 2534-2545

  Elmula, Fadl Elmula M Fadl ^a   Rebora, Paola ^b   Talvik, Anneli ^c   Salerno, Sabrina ^b,d   Miszkowska Nagórna, Eliza ^e   Liu, Xiaoqiu ^b,d   Heinpalu Kuum, Marika ^c   Comotti, Tommaso ^b,d   Larstorp, Anne C ^a   Rostrup, Morten ^a   ͆wierblewska, Ewa ^e   Valsecchi, Maria Grazia ^b   Kjeldsen, Sverre E ^a   Viigimaa, Margus ^c   Narkiewicz, Krzysztof ^e   Parati, Gianfranco ^b,d   Laurent, Stéphane ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^c TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Estonia)

^d ISTITUTO AUXOLOGICO ITALIANO   (Italy)

^e MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GDANSK   (Poland)

^f HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

Author keywords

ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; antihypertensive drugs; blood pressure control; integrated hemodynamic monitoring; uncontrolled hypertension

Indexed keywords

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKING AGENT; DIURETIC AGENT;

ABNORMAL SENSATION; ADULT; AGED; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY; APPETITE DISORDER; ARTICLE; BRADYCARDIA; BREATHING DISORDER; CONSTIPATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUGHING; DIARRHEA; DIURETIC THERAPY; DIZZINESS; DRUG CHOICE; DRY EYE; EDEMA; EYE DISEASE; FAINTNESS; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FLUSHING; HEADACHE; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPH; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT; MOOD DISORDER; MULTICENTER STUDY; MUSCLE CRAMP; NAUSEA AND VOMITING; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; OXYGEN TRANSPORT; PARALLEL DESIGN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PRURITUS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RASH; RAYNAUD PHENOMENON; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; SIDE EFFECT; SKIN BRUISING; SKIN DISEASE; SLEEP DISORDER; STOMACH DISEASE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TACHYCARDIA; TASTE DISORDER; THIRST; THORAX PAIN; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNSPECIFIED SIDE EFFECT; WEAKNESS; WEIGHT CHANGE; XEROSTOMIA; ALGORITHM; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL TRIAL; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, AMBULATORY; CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DIURETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84947042341     PISSN: 02636352     EISSN: 14735598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000749     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Egan BM, Zhao Y, Axon RN, Brzezinski WA, Ferdinand KC. Uncontrolled and apparent treatment resistant hypertension in the United States, 1988 to 2008. Circulation 2011; 124:1046-1058.
2. De la Sierra A, Segura J, Banegas JR, Gorostidi M, de la Cruz JJ, Armario P, et al. Clinical features of 8295 patients with resistant hypertension classified on the basis of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension 2011; 57:889-890.
3. Redón J, Coca A, Lázaro P, Aguilar MD, Cabanãs M, Gil N, et al. Factors associated with therapeutic inertia in hypertension: validation of a predictive model. J Hypertens 2010; 28:1770-1777.
4. Mancia G, de Backer G, Cifkova R, Dominiczak A, Fagard R, Germano G, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2007; 25:1105-1187.
5. Gifford RW. An algorithm for the management of resistant hypertension. Hypertension 1988; 11 (I):171-175.
6. Klein LE. Compliance and blood pressure control. Hypertension 1988; 11 (I):161-164.
7. Ceral J, Habrdova V, Vorisek V, Bima M, Pelouch R, Solar M. Difficultto-control arterial hypertension or uncooperative patients? The assessment of serum antihypertensive drug levels to differentiate nonresponsiveness from nonadherence to recommended therapy. Hypertens Res 2011; 34:87-90.
8. Taler SJ, Textor SC, Augustine JE. Resistant hypertension: comparing hemodynamic management to specialist care. Hypertension 2002; 39:982-988.
9. Faini A, Omboni S, Tifrea M, Bubenek S, Lazar O, Parati G. Cardiac index assessment: validation of a new noninvasive very low current thoracic bioimpedance device by thermodilution. Blood Press 2014; 23:102-108.
10. Bo Sramek. Systemic hemodynamics and hemodynamic management. Instantpublishercom 2002;45-75.
11. Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, Bilo G, de Leeuw P, Imai Y, et al., ESH Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. J Hypertens 2008; 26:1505-1526.
12. Pletcher MJ, Pignone M. Evaluation the clinical utility of a biomarker. A review of methods for estimating health impact. Circulation 2011; 123:1116-1124.
13. Abdelhammed AI, Smith RD, Levy P, Smits GJ, Ferrario CM. Noninvasive hemodynamic profiles in hypertensive subjects. Am J Hypertens 2005; 18 (Pt 2):51S-59S.
14. Sanford T, Treister N, Peters C. Use of noninvasive hemodynamics in hypertension management. Am J Hypertens 2005; 18 (Pt 2):87S-91S.
15. Treister N, Wagner K, Jansen PR. Reproducibility of impedance cardiography parameters in outpatients with clinically stable coronary artery disease. Am J Hypertens 2005; 18 (Pt 2):44S-50S.
16. Ventura HO, Taler SJ, Strobeck JE. Hypertension as a hemodynamic disease: the role of impedance cardiography in diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic decision making. Am J Hypertens 2005; 18 (Pt 2):26S-43S.
17. Smith RD, Levy P, Ferrario CM. Consideration of noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring to target reduction of blood pressure levels study group. Hypertension 2006; 47:771-777.
18. Ferrario CM, Flack JM, Strobeck JE, Smits G, Peters C. Individualizing hypertension treatment with impedance cardiography: a meta-analysis of published trials. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 2010; 4:5-16.
19. Krzesiński P, Gielerak GG, Kowal JJ. A 'patient-tailored' treatment of hypertension with use of impedance cardiography: a randomized, prospective and controlled trial. Med Sci Monit 2013; 19:242-250.
20. Bernstein DP1, Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB. Limitations of impedance cardiography. Obes Surg 2005; 15:659-660.
21. Wang DJ1, Gottlieb SS. Impedance cardiography: more questions than answers. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2006; 3:107-113.
22. Sharman JE, Marwick TH, Gilroy D, Otahal P, Abhayaratna WP, et al., on behalf of the BP GUIDE study investigators. Randomized trial of guiding hypertension management using central aortic blood pressure compared with best-practice care. Principal findings of the BP GUIDE Study. Hypertension 2013; 62:1138-1145.