G-computation demonstration in causal mediation analysis

European Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1119-1127

  Wang, Aolin ^a,b   Arah, Onyebuchi A ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Effect decomposition; G computation; Mediation analysis; Parametric g formula; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BOOTSTRAPPING; CAUSAL MEDIATION ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; G COMPUTATION ALGORITHM; HUMAN; MONTE CARLO METHOD; OUTCOME VARIABLE; PARAMETRIC TEST; SIMULATION; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC MODEL; CAUSALITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MORTALITY; PROCEDURES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS; SMOKING; STATISTICAL BIAS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CAUSALITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EFFECT MODIFIER, EPIDEMIOLOGIC; EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS; SMOKING;

EID: 84947026110     PISSN: 03932990     EISSN: 15737284     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10654-015-0100-z     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Robins J. A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Math Model. 1986;7(9–12):1393–512.
2. Robins JM, Hernan MA. Estimation of the causal effects of time-varying exposures. In: Verbeke G, Davidian M, Fitzmaurice G, Molenberghs G, editors. Longitudinal data analysis. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2009. p. 553–99.
3. Imai K, Keele L. Tingley DA general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol Methods. 2010;15(4):309–34.
4. Daniel RM, De Stavola BL, Cousens SN. gformula: estimating causal effects in the presence of time-varying confounding or mediation using the g-computation formula. Stata J. 2011;11(4):479–517.
5. Valeri L, Vanderweele TJ. Mediation analysis allowing for exposure–mediator interactions and causal interpretation: theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psychol Methods. 2013;18(2):137–50.
6. Snowden JM, Rose S, Mortimer KM. Implementation of G-computation on a simulated data set: demonstration of a causal inference technique. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(7):731–8.
7. VanderWeele T, Tchetgen ET. Mediation analysis with time-varying exposures and mediators. Harvard Univ Biostat Work Pap Ser. 2014. Working Paper 168. http://biostats.bepress.com/harvardbiostat/paper168.
8. VanderWeele TJ. A three-way decomposition of a total effect into direct, indirect, and interactive effects. Epidemiology. 2013;24(2):224–32.
9. VanderWeele TJ. A unification of mediation and interaction: a 4-way decomposition. Epidemiology. 2014;25(5):749–61.
10. Vansteelandt S. Estimation of direct and indirect effects. In: Berzuini C, Dawid P, Bernardinelli L, editors. Causality: statistical perspectives and applications. Chichester: Wiley; 2012. p. 126–50.
11. Robins JM, Greenland S. Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 1992;3(2):143–55.
12. Pearl J. Direct and indirect effects. In: Proceedings of the seventeenth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann; 2001. p. 411–20. http://ftp.cs.ucla.edu/pub/stat_ser/R273-U.pdf.
13. Naimi AI, Moodie EEM, Auger N, Kaufman JS. Stochastic mediation contrasts in epidemiologic research: interpregnancy interval and the educational disparity in preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180(4):436–45.
14. Rubin DB. Discussion of “Randomization analysis of experimental data in the Fisher randomization test” by Basu. J Am Stat Assoc. 1980;75(371):591–3.
15. Rubin DB. Neyman (1923) and causal inference in experiments and observational studies. Stat Sci. 1990;5:472–80.
16. Robins JM, Hernán MA, Brumback B. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2000;11:550–60.
17. Hernán MA, Robins JM. Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:578–86.
18. Vanderweele TJ, Vansteelandt S, Robins JM. Effect decomposition in the presence of an exposure-induced mediator–outcome confounder. Epidemiology. 2014;25:300–6.
19. Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D, Yamamoto T. Unpacking the black box of causality: learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2011;105:765–89.
20. VanderWeele TJ. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 2010;21:540–51.
21. Richardson TS, Robins JM. Single world intervention graphs (SWIGs): a unification of the counterfactual and graphical approaches to causality. 2013. https://www.csss.washington.edu/Papers/wp128.pdf.
22. Naimi AI, Kaufman JS, MacLehose RF. Mediation misgivings: ambiguous clinical and public health interpretations of natural direct and indirect effects. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(5):1656–61.
23. Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ. Vanderweele TJ. Identification of natural direct effects when a confounder of the mediator is directly affected by exposure. Epidemiology. 2014;25(2):282–91.
24. Daniel RM, De Stavola BL, Cousens SN, Vansteelandt S. Causal mediation analysis with multiple mediators. Biometrics. 2015;71:1–14.
25. Daniel RM, Cousens SN, De Stavola BL, Kenward MG, Sterne JAC. Methods for dealing with time-dependent confounding. Stat Med. 2013;32:1584–618.
26. Keil AP, Edwards JK, Richardson DB, Naimi AI, Cole SR. The parametric G-formula for time-to-event data: intuition and a worked example. Epidemiology. 2014;25:889–97.
27. Young JG, Cain LE, Robins JM, O’Reilly EJ, Hernán MA. Comparative effectiveness of dynamic treatment regimes: an application of the parametric g-formula. Stat Biosci. 2011;3:119–43.
28. Westreich D, Cole SR, Young JG, Palella F, Tien PC, Kingsley L, et al. The parametric g-formula to estimate the effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on incident AIDS or death. Stat Med. 2012;31:2000–9.
29. Ahern J, Hubbard A, Galea S. Estimating the effects of potential public health interventions on population disease burden: a step-by-step illustration of causal inference methods. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169:1140–7.
30. Taubman SL, Robins JM, Mittleman MA, Hernán MA. Intervening on risk factors for coronary heart disease: an application of the parametric g-formula. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38:1599–611.
31. Cole SR, Richardson DB, Chu H, Naimi AI. Analysis of occupational asbestos exposure and lung cancer mortality using the g formula. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177:989–96.
32. Danaei G, Pan A, Hu FB, Hernán MA. Hypothetical midlife interventions in women and risk of type 2 diabetes. Epidemiology. 2013;24:122–8.
33. Garcia-Aymerich J, Varraso R, Danaei G, Camargo CA, Hernán MA. Incidence of adult-onset asthma after hypothetical interventions on body mass index and physical activity: an application of the parametric g-formula. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179:20–6.
34. Pearl J. Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika. 1995;82(4):669–88.
35. World Health Organization. World Health Survey: guide to administration and question by question specifications. Geneva. 2002. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/whsshortversionguide.pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2015.
36. Simpson EH. The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1951;13:238–41.
37. Vansteelandt S, Bekaert M, Lange T. Imputation strategies for the estimation of natural direct and indirect effects. Epidemiol Method. 2012;1(1):131–58.
38. Tchetgen EJT, Shpitser I. Semiparametric theory for causal mediation analysis: efficiency bounds, multiple robustness and sensitivity analysis. Ann Stat. 2012;40(3):1816–45.
39. Tchetgen Tchetgen E, Shpitser I. Semiparametric estimation of models for natural direct and indirect effects. Harvard Univ Biostat Work Pap Ser. 2011.
40. Van der Laan MJ, Petersen ML. Direct effect models. Int J Biostat. 2008;4(1):1–27.
41. VanderWeele TJ. Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 2009;20(1):18–26.
42. Imai K, Keele L, Yamamoto T. Identification, inference and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Stat Sci. 2010;25(1):51–71.
43. Albert JM. Distribution-free mediation analysis for nonlinear models with confounding. Epidemiology. 2012;23(6):879–88.
44. Zhang YT, Laraia BA, Mujahid MS, et al. Does food vendor density mediate the association between neighborhood deprivation and BMI? Epidemiology. 2015;26(3):344–52.
45. Jackson JW, VanderWeele TJ, Viswanathan A, Blacker D, Schneeweiss S. The explanatory role of stroke as a mediator of the mortality risk difference between older adults who initiate first- versus second-generation antipsychotic drugs. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180(8):847–52.
46. Hernán MA. Invited commentary: agent-based models for causal inference—reweighting data and theory in epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(2):103–5.
47. Pearl J. The causal mediation formula—a guide to the assessment of pathways and mechanisms. Prev Sci. 2012;13(4):426–36.
48. Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D, Yamamoto T. Unpacking the black box: learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2011;105(4):765–89.