Stochastic mediation contrasts in epidemiologic research: Interpregnancy interval and the educational disparity in preterm delivery

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 180, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 436-445

  Naimi, Ashley I ^a   Moodie, Erica E M ^a   Auger, Nathalie ^b,c   Kaufman, Jay S ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b INSTITUT NATIONAL DE SANTÉ PUBLIQUE DU QUÉBEC   (Canada)

^c CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Controlled direct effect; Interpregnancy interval; Maternal education; Mediation analysis; Perinatal epidemiology; Pregnancy; Preterm delivery; Social epidemiology

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION REFORM; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH RISK; PREGNANCY; RESEARCH WORK; STOCHASTICITY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTRIBUTABLE RISK; CANADA; COLLEGE; EDUCATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GESTATIONAL AGE; HIGH SCHOOL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; MATERNAL ATTITUDE; PATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE LABOR; SOCIAL ISOLATION; STOCHASTIC MODEL; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; PREMATURE BIRTH; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

CANADA; QUEBEC [CANADA];

ADULT; BIRTH INTERVALS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREGNANCY; PREMATURE BIRTH; QUEBEC; RISK FACTORS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 84907302555     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwu138     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Callaghan WM, MacDorman MF, Rasmussen SA, et al. The contribution of preterm birth to infant mortality rates in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4): 1566-1573.
2. Moster D, Lie RT, Markestad T. Long-Term medical and social consequences of preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(3): 262-273.
3. Auger N, Hansen AV, Mortensen L. Contribution of maternal age to preterm birth rates in Denmark and Quebec, 1981-2008. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(10): e33-e38.
4. Joseph KS, Liston RM, Dodds L, et al. Socioeconomic status and perinatal outcomes in a setting with universal access to essential health care services. CMAJ. 2007;177(6): 583-590.
5. Kramer MS, Seguin L, Lydon J, et al. Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000;14(3): 194-210.
6. Luo ZC,Wilkins R, Kramer MS, et al. Effect of neighbourhood income and maternal education on birth outcomes: a population-based study. CMAJ. 2006;174(10): 1415-1420.
7. Morgen CS, Bjork C, Andersen PK, et al. Socioeconomic position and the risk of preterm birth-A study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(5): 1109-1120.
8. Parker JD, Schoendorf KC, Kiely JL. Associations between measures of socioeconomic status and low birth weight, small for gestational age, and premature delivery in the United States. Ann Epidemiol. 1994;4(4): 271-278.
9. Savitz DA, Kaufman JS, Dole N, et al. Poverty, education, race, and pregnancy outcome. Ethn Dis. 2004;14(3): 322-329.
10. Grjibovski AM, Bygren LO, Yngve A, et al. Large social disparities in spontaneous preterm birth rates in transitional Russia. Public Health. 2005;119(2): 77-86.
11. Auger N, Roncarolo F, Harper S. Increasing educational inequality in preterm birth in Quebec, Canada, 1981-2006. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65(12): 1091-1096.
12. Reagan PB, Salsberry PJ. Race and ethnic differences in determinants of preterm birth in the USA: broadening the social context. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(10): 2217-2228.
13. Petersen CB, Mortensen LH, Morgen CS, et al. Socio-economic inequality in preterm birth: a comparative study of the Nordic countries from 1981 to 2000. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009;23(1): 66-75.
14. Harper S, Strumpf EC. Social epidemiology: questionable answers and answerable questions. Epidemiology. 2012;23(6): 795-798.
15. Kawachi I. Editorial: isn't all epidemiology social? Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6): 841-842.
16. Galea S, Link BG. Six paths for the future of social epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6): 843-849.
17. Oakes JM. Invited commentary: paths and pathologies of social epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6): 850-851.
18. Muntaner C. Invited commentary: on the future of social epidemiology-A case for scientific realism. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6): 852-857.
19. Glymour MM, Osypuk TL, Rehkopf DH. Invited commentary: off-roading with social epidemiology-exploration, causation, translation. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6): 858-863.
20. Galea S, Link BG. Galea and Link respond to "Pathologies of social epidemiology," "Social epidemiology and scientific realism," and "Off-roading with social epidemiology." Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6): 864.
21. Kaufman JS, Cooper RS. Seeking causal explanations in social epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150(2): 113-120.
22. Greenland S. Epidemiologic measures and policy formulation: lessons from potential outcomes. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2005;2: 5.
23. Link BG, Phelan J. Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. J Health Soc Behav. 1995;35(Extra Issue): 80-94.
24. Phelan JC, Link BG, Tehranifar P. Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities: theory, evidence, and policy implications. J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51(suppl 1): S28-S40.
25. Kaufman JS, MacLehose RF, Torrone EA, et al. A flexible Bayesian hierarchical model of preterm birth risk among US Hispanic subgroups in relation to maternal nativity and education. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1): 51.
26. Howard EJ, Harville E, Kissinger P, et al. The association between short interpregnancy interval and preterm birth in Louisiana: a comparison of methods. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(5): 933-939.
27. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-Analysis. JAMA. 2006;295(15): 1809-1823.
28. Thiel de Bocanegra H, Chang R, Menz M, et al. Postpartum contraception in publicly-funded programs and interpregnancy intervals. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(2): 296-303.
29. Naimi AI, Moodie EEM, Auger N, et al. Semiparametric adjusted exposure response curves. Epidemiology. In press
30. Kaharuza FM, Sabroe S, Basso O. Choice and chance: determinants of short interpregnancy intervals in Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(6): 532-538.
31. Blumenshine P, Egerter S, Barclay CJ, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(3): 263-272.
32. Hogue CJ, Menon R, Dunlop AL, et al. Racial disparities in preterm birth rates and short inter-pregnancy interval: an overview. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(12): 1317-1324.
33. Goetgeluk S, Vansteelandt S, Goetghebeur E. Estimation of controlled direct effects. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2008;70(5): 1049-1066.
34. Vansteelandt S. Estimation of direct and indirect effects. In: Berzuini C, Dawid P, Bernardinelli L, eds. Causality: Statistical Perspectives and Applications. West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2012: 126-150.
35. Robins J, Hernán M. Estimation of the causal effects of time-varying exposures. In: Fitzmaurice G, Davidian M, Verbeke G, et al., eds. Advances in Longitudinal Data Analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall, Inc.; 2009: 553-599.
36. Robins J. Estimation of the time-dependent accelerated failure time model in the presence of confounding factors. Biometrika. 1992;79(2): 321-334.
37. VanderWeele TJ, Vansteelandt S. Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and composition. Stat Interface. 2009;2(4): 457-468.
38. Pampalon R, Hamel D, Gamache P, et al. A deprivation index for health planning in Canada. Chronic Dis Can. 2009;29(4): 178-191.
39. Pearl J. Direct and indirect effects. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 2001: 411-420.
40. Cole SR, Platt RW, Schisterman EF, et al. Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(2): 417-420.
41. Huber PJ. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1967: 221-233.
42. White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica. 1980;48(4): 817-838.
43. Efron B, Tibshirani R. Introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1993.
44. Taubman SL, Robins JM, Mittleman MA, et al. Alternative approaches to estimating the effects of hypothetical interventions. In: JSM Proceedings, Health Policy Statistics Section. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association; 2008.
45. National Center for Health Statistics, US Department of Health and Human Services. FP-5. Reduce the proportion of pregnancies conceived within 18 months of a previous birth. In: 2020 Topics and Objectives-Family Planning. (http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist. aspx?topicId=13#452). Bethesda, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2013. (Accessed July 15, 2014).
46. Howards PP, Schisterman EF, Heagerty PJ. Potential confounding by exposure history and prior outcomes: an example from perinatal epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2007; 18(5): 544-551.
47. Lash TL, Fink AK. Semi-Automated sensitivity analysis to assess systematic errors in observational data. Epidemiology. 2003;14(4): 451-458.
48. VanderWeele TJ. Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 2009;20(1): 18-26.
49. Gruber S, van der Laan MJ. tmle: an R package for targeted maximum likelihood estimation. J Stat Softw. 2012;51(13).
50. Daniel RM, De Stavola BL, Cousens SN. gformula: estimating causal effects in the presence of time-varying confounding or mediation using the g-computation formula. Stata J. 2011; 11(4): 479-517.
51. Muñoz ID, van der Laan M. Population intervention causal effects based on stochastic interventions. Biometrics. 2012; 68(2): 541-549.
52. Westreich D. From exposures to population interventions: pregnancy and response to HIV therapy. Am J Epidemiol. 2014; 179(7): 797-806.
53. Robins J, Hernán M, Siebert U. Effects of multiple interventions. In: Ezzati M, Murray CJL, Lopez AD, et al., eds. Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004: 2191-2230.
54. Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18: 341-378.
55. VanderWeele TJ, Hernán MA. Causal effects and natural laws: towards a conceptualization of causal counterfactuals for non-manipulable exposures with application to the effects of race and sex. In: Berzuini C, Dawid P, Bernardinelli L, eds. Causality: Statistical Perspectives and Applications. Hoboken, NJ: John-Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2012: 101-112.
56. VanderWeele TJ. Concerning the consistency assumption in causal inference. Epidemiology. 2009;20(6): 880-883.
57. Galea S. An argument for a consequentialist epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(8): 1185-1191.