SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process

Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing

Volumn 46, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 501-507

  Ogrinc, Greg ^a,b,c   Davies, Louise ^a,d   Goodman, Daisy ^a   Batalden, Paul ^a   Davidoff, Frank ^c   Stevens, David ^c,e,f  

^a DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b White River Junction VA ^*  (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

^d VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e BMJ   (United Kingdom)

^f INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

CONSENSUS; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PUBLISHING; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84946907825     PISSN: 00220124     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/00220124-20151020-02     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Davidoff F, Batalden P. Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:319–25.
2. DeVinney B, ed. Expanding Research and Evaluation Designs to Improve the Science Base for Health Care and Public Health Quality Improvement Symposium. Washington DC: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Conference Summary, 15 Sep 2005.
3. Shojania KG, Grimshaw JM. Evidence-based quality improvement: the state of the science. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24:138-50.
4. Grol RP, Bosch MC, Hulscher ME, et al. Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q 2007;85:93–138.
5. Rubenstein LV, Hempel S, Farmer MM, et al. Finding order in heterogeneity: types of quality-improvement intervention publications. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:403–8.
6. Davidoff F, Batalden P, Stevens D, et al. Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17(Suppl 1):i3–9.
7. Batalden P, Leach D, Swing S, et al. General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21:103–11.
8. Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: Report of an Expert Panel. Washington DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative, 2011.
9. Teaching for Quality. 2013. https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/cei/te4q/ (accessed 21 Jun 2013).
10. Cronenwett L, Sherwood G, Barnsteiner J, et al. Quality and safety education for nurses. Nurs Outlook 2007;55:122–31.
11. Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, et al. The next GME accreditation system—rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1051–6.
12. Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, et al. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:228–38.
13. Bate P, Robert G, Fulop N, et al. Perspectives on context. London: The Health Foundation, 2014.
14. Kaplan HC, Provost LP, Froehle CM, et al. The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 2012;21:13–20.
15. Øvretveit J. Understanding the conditions for improvement: research to discover which context influences affect improvement success. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20(Suppl 1):i18–23.
16. Taylor SL, Dy S, Foy R, et al. What context features might be important determinants of the effectiveness of patient safety practice interventions? BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:611–17.
17. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014;348:1–12.
18. Portela MC, Pronovost PJ, Woodcock T, et al. How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:325–36.
19. Davies L, Batalden P, Davidoff F, et al. The SQUIRE guidelines: an evaluation from the field, 5 years post release. BMJ Qual Saf 2015. Published Online First: 18 Jun 2015. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004116
20. Howell V, Schwartz AE, O’Leary JD, et al. The effect of the SQUIRE (Standards of QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines on reporting standards in the quality improvement literature: a before-and-after study. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:400–6.
21. Stevens D. SQUIRE and the evolving science of healthcare improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:349–51.
22. Davies L, Donnelly K, Goodman D, et al. Findings from a novel approach to publication guideline revision: User road testing of a draft version of SQUIRE 2.0. BMJ Qual Saf 2015 (in press). doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004117
23. Day RA. The origins of the scien tific paper: the IMRaD format. J Am Med Writers Assoc 1989;4:16–18.
24. Huth E. Writing and publishing in medicine. 3rd edn. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1999.
25. Baily M, Bottrell M, Lynn J, et al. Special report: the ethics of using QI methods to improve health care quality and safety. Hastings Center Rep 2006;34:s1–40.