Fortune is fickle: null-effects of disfluency on learning outcomes

Metacognition and Learning

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 57-70

  Rummer, Ralf ^a   Schweppe, Judith ^a   Schwede, Annett ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERFURT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Disfluency effect; Learning; Memory; Replicability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84946854797     PISSN: 15561623     EISSN: 15561631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-015-9151-5     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alter, A. L. (2013). The benefits of cognitive disfluency. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(6), 473–442.
2. Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle). Psychological Science, 19, 161–167.
3. Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235.
4. Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 569–576.
5. Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., & Epley, N. (2013). Disfluency prompts analytic thinking - but not always greater accuracy: response to Thompson et al. (2013). Cognition, 128, 252–255.
6. Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444.
7. Carpenter, S. K., Wilford, M. M., Kornell, N., & Mullaney, K. M. (2013). Appearances can be deceiving: instructor fluency increases perceptions of learning without increasing actual learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1350–1356.
8. Cotton, D., Joseph, E., Lede, M., & Ronan, D. (2014). The effect of font structure on memory and reading. Time Poster presented at the biannual evening of psychological science, University of Connecticut.
9. Craik, F., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104(3), 268–294.
10. Diemand-Yauman, C., Oppenheimer, D. M., & Vaughan, E. B. (2011). Fortune favors the bold (and the italicized): effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition, 118, 114–118.
11. Dunlosky, J., Serra, M., & Baker, J. M. C. (2007). Metamemory applied. In F. T. Durso, R. S. Nickerson, S. T. Dumais, S. Lewandowsky, & T. J. Perfect (Eds.), Handbook of applied cognition (2nd ed., pp. 137–59). New York: Wiley.
12. Eckart, H., Predatsch, Ch., Rauscher, V., Gregory, S., Nikolaev, B. & Rummer, R. (2015). Hard to read fonts do not improve memory (not even with very simple learning materials). Unpublished Manuscript, University of Erfurt.
13. Eitel, A., Kühl, T., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2014). Disfluency meets cognitive load in multimedia learning: does harder-to-read mean better-to-understand? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 488–501.
14. French, M. M. J., Blood, A., Bright, N. D., Futak, D., Grohmann, M. J., Hasthorpe, A., Heritage, J., Poland, R. L., Reece, S., & Tabor, J. (2013). Changing fonts in education: how the benefits vary with ability and dyslexia. The Journal of Educational Research, 106, 301–304.
15. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Hunt, R. R., & Worthen, J. B. (Eds.). (2006). Distinctiveness and memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Jenkins, W. O., & Postman, L. (1948). Isolation and spread of effect in serial learning. American Journal of Psychology, 61, 214–221.
18. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Allen Lane and Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
19. Kühl, T., Eitel, A., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2014). A call for an unbiased search for moderators in disfluency research: reply to Oppenheimer and Alter (2014). Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 805–806.
20. Lee, M. H. (2013). Effects of disfluent kanji fonts on reading retention with e-book. Paper presented at the 2013 I.E. 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT; pp. 481– 482). Beijing, China: IEEE.
21. Meyer, A., Frederick, S., Burnham, T. C., Guevara Pinto, J. D., Boyer, T. W., Ball, L. J., Pennycook, G., Ackerman, R., Thompson, V. A., & Schuldt, J. P. (2015). Disfluent fonts don’t help people solve math problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(2), e16–e30.
22. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). New York: Academic.
23. Norman, D., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation. New York: Plenum Press.
24. Oppenheimer, D. M., & Alter, A. L. (2014). The search for moderators in disfluency research. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(4), 502–504.
25. Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy - psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162, 8–13.
26. Sungkhasettee, V. W., Friedman, M. C., & Castel, A. D. (2011). Memory and metamemory for inverted words: illusions of competency and desirable difficulties. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 973–978.
27. Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12(3), 185–233.
28. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.
29. Thompson, V. A., Turner, J. A. P., Pennycook, G., Ball, L. J., Brack, H., Ophir, Y., & Ackerman, R. (2013). The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking. Cognition, 128, 237–251.
30. Weltman, D., & Eakin, M. (2014). Incorporating unusual fonts and planned mistakes in study materials to increase business student focus and retention. INFORMS Transactions on Education, 15, 156–165.
31. Yue, C. L., Castel, A. D., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). When disfluency is—and is not—a desirable difficulty: the influence of typeface clarity on metacognitive judgments and memory. Memory & Cognition, 41, 229–241.