Validation of statistical shape modelling to predict hip osteoarthritis in females: Data from two prospective cohort studies (Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee and Chingford)

Rheumatology (United Kingdom)

Volumn 54, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 2033-2041

  Agricola, Rintje ^a,b   Leyland, Kirsten M ^b,c   Bierma Zeinstra, Sita M A ^a   Thomas, Geraint E ^c   Emans, Pieter J ^d   Spector, Timothy D ^e   Weinans, Harrie ^f,g   Waarsing, Jan H ^a   Arden, Nigel K ^b,c  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^g DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

active shape modelling; epidemiology; hip shape; morphology; osteoarthritis; radiography; statistical shape modelling; total hip replacement; validation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GREATER TROCHANTER; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORPHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VALIDATION STUDY;

EID: 84946742495     PISSN: 14620324     EISSN: 14620332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev232     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Org 2003;81:646-56.
2. Reginster JY. The prevalence and burden of arthritis. Rheumatology 2002;41(Supp 1):3-6.
3. Nho SJ, Kymes SM, Callaghan JJ, Felson DT. The burden of hip osteoarthritis in the United States: epidemiologic and economic considerations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013;21(Suppl 1):S1-6.
4. Agricola R, Heijboer MP, Bierma-Zeinstra SM et al. Cam impingement causes osteoarthritis of the hip: a nationwide prospective cohort study (CHECK). Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:918-23.
5. Nicholls AS, Kiran A, Pollard TC et al. The association between hip morphology parameters and nineteen-year risk of end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip: a nested casecontrol study. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:3392-400.
6. Agricola R, Reijman M, Bierma-Zeinstra SM et al. Total hip replacement but not clinical osteoarthritis can be predicted by the shape of the hip: a prospective cohort study (CHECK). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013;21:559-64.
7. Gregory JS, Waarsing JH, Day J et al. Early identification of radiographic osteoarthritis of the hip using an active shape model to quantify changes in bone morphometric features: can hip shape tell us anything about the progression of osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:3634-43.
8. Agricola R, Heijboer MP, Roze RH et al. Pincer deformity does not lead to osteoarthritis of the hip whereas acetabular dysplasia does: acetabular coverage and development of osteoarthritis in a nationwide prospective cohort study (CHECK). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013;21:1514-21.
9. Reijman M, Hazes JM, Pols HA, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Acetabular dysplasia predicts incident osteoarthritis of the hip: the Rotterdam study. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:787-93.
10. Lane NE, Lin P, Christiansen L et al. Association of mild acetabular dysplasia with an increased risk of incident hip osteoarthritis in elderly white women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:400-4.
11. Agricola R, Waarsing JH, Thomas GE et al. Cam impingement: defining the presence of a cam deformity by the alpha angle; data from the CHECK cohort and Chingford cohort. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014;22:218-25.
12. Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH et al. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:556-60.
13. Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint, with special reference to the complications of osteoarthritis. Acta Chirurgica Scand 1939;83(Suppl 58):5-135.
14. Agricola R, Bessems JH, Ginai AZ et al. The development of cam-type deformity in adolescent and young male soccer players. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:1099-106.
15. Siebenrock KA, Ferner F, Noble PC et al. The cam-type deformity of the proximal femur arises in childhood in response to vigorous sporting activity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:3229-40.
16. Barr RJ, Gregory JS, Reid DM et al. Predicting OA progression to total hip replacement: can we do better than risk factors alone using active shape modelling as an imaging biomarker? Rheumatology 2012;51:562-70.
17. Lynch JA, Parimi N, Chaganti RK, Nevitt MC, Lane NE. The association of proximal femoral shape and incident radiographic hip OA in elderly women. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009;17:1313-8.
18. Nelson AE, Liu F, Lynch JA et al. Association of incident symptomatic hip osteoarthritis with differences in hip shape by active shape modeling: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. Arthritis Care Res 2014;66:74-81.
19. Waarsing JH, Rozendaal RM, Verhaar JA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Weinans H. A statistical model of shape and density of the proximal femur in relation to radiological and clinical OA of the hip. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010;18:787-94.
20. Waarsing JH, Kloppenburg M, Slagboom PE et al. Osteoarthritis susceptibility genes influence the association between hip morphology and osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:1349-54.
21. Baker-Lepain JC, Lynch JA, Parimi N et al. Variant alleles of the Wnt antagonist FRZB are determinants of hip shape and modify the relationship between hip shape and osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:1457-65.
22. Sarkalkan N, Weinans H, Zadpoor AA. Statistical shape and appearance models of bones. Bone 2013;60:129-40.
23. Wesseling J, Dekker J, van den Berg WB et al. CHECK (Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee): similarities and differences with the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1413-9.
24. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494-502.
25. Schiphof D, Boers M, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Differences in descriptions of Kellgren and Lawrence grades of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:1034-6.
26. Cootes TF TC, Cooper DH, Graham J. Active shape models-their training and application. Comput Vis Image Und 1995;61:38-59.
27. Castano-Betancourt MC, Van Meurs JB, Bierma-Zeinstra S et al. The contribution of hip geometry to the prediction of hip osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013;21:1530-6.
28. Agricola R, Waarsing JH, Arden NK et al. Cam impingement of the hip: a risk factor for hip osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2013;9:630-4.
29. Agricola R, Heijboer MP, Ginai AZ et al. A cam deformity is gradually acquired during skeletal maturation in adolescent and young male soccer players: a prospective study with minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J SportsMed 2014;42:798-806.
30. Dougados M, Gueguen A, Nguyen M et al. Requirement for total hip arthroplasty: an outcome measure of hip osteoarthritis? J Rheumatol 1999;26:855-61.
31. Lindner C, Thiagarajah S, Wilkinson JM, Wallis GA, Cootes TF. Development of a fully automatic shape model matching (FASMM) system to derive statistical shape models from radiographs: application to the accurate capture and global representation of proximal femur shape. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013;21:1537-44.