Implementation of out-of-office blood pressure monitoring in The Netherlands: From clinical guidelines to patients' adoption of innovation

Medicine (United States)

Volumn 94, Issue 43, 2015, Pages

  Carrera, Pricivel M ^a   Lambooij, Mattijs S ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NETHERLANDS; OUT OF OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; SELF CONCEPT; SPHYGMOMANOMETER; THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HYPERTENSION; PSYCHOLOGY; SELF CARE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, AMBULATORY; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; SELF CARE; SELF EFFICACY;

EID: 84946600526     PISSN: 00257974     EISSN: 15365964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001813     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Arrieta A, Woods JR, Qiao N, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of home blood pressure monitoring in hypertension diagnosis and treatment: an insurer perspective. Hypertension. 2014;64:891-896.
2. McManus RJ, Mant J, Haque MS, et al. Effect of self-monitoring and medication self-titration on systolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: the TASMIN-SR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;312:799-808.
3. Bosworth HB, Powers BJ, Oddone EZ. Patient self-management support: novel strategies in hypertension and heart disease. Cardiol Clin. 2010;28:655-663.
4. Bray EP, Holder R, Mant J, et al. Does self-monitoring reduce blood pressure? Meta-analysis with meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Ann Med. 2010;42:371-386.
5. O'Brien E. Ambulatory blood pressure measurement: the case for implementation in primary care. Hypertension. 2008;51:1435-1441.
6. Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, et al. European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for home blood pressure monitoring. J Hum Hypertens. 2010;24:779-785.
7. Parati G, Stergiou G, O'Brien E, et al. European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2014;32:1359-1366.
8. Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, et al. European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. J Hypertens. 2008;26:1505-1526.
9. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Hypertension: clinical management of primary hypertension in adults (update). (clinical guideline 127). 2011.
10. National Heart Foundation of Australia (National Blood Pressure and Vascular Disease Advisory Committee). Guide to management of hypertension 2008. Updated December 2010.
11. Shimamoto K, Ando K, Fujita T, et al. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2014). Hypertens Res. 2014;37:253-392.
12. Birkett NJ. The effect of alternative criteria for hypertension on estimates of prevalence and control. J Hypertens. 1997;15:237-244.
13. Warren RE, Marshall T, Padfield PL, et al. Variability of office, 24-hour ambulatory, and self-monitored blood pressure measurements. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60:675-680.
14. Parati G, Omboni S, Bilo G. Why is out-of-office blood pressure measurement needed? Hypertension. 2009;54:181-187.
15. Hodgkinson J, Mant J, Martin U, et al. Relative effectiveness of clinic and home blood pressure monitoring compared with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in diagnosis of hypertension: systematic review. BMJ. 2011;342:d3621.
16. Dutch College of General Practitioners. Guidelines for cardiovascular risk management summary [Dutch]. https://www.nhg.org/standaarden/samenvatting/cardiovasculair-risicomanagement. Accessed 3 November 2014.
17. Dutch College of General Practitioners. Cardiovascular Risk Management, Second Revision [Dutch]. Huisarts Wet. 2012;55:1-39.
18. Jones MI, Greenfield SM, Bray EP, et al. Patients' experiences of self-monitoring blood pressure and self-titration of medication: the TASMINH2 trial qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62:e135-e142.
19. Jones MI, Greenfield SM, Bray EP, et al. Patient self-monitoring of blood pressure and self-titration of medication in primary care: the TASMINH2 trial qualitative study of health professionals' experiences. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63:e378-e385.
20. Howes F, Hansen E, Nelson M. Management of hypertension in general practice-a qualitative needs assessment of Australian GPs. Aust Fam Physician. 2012;41:317-323.
21. Lugtenberg M, Zegers-Van Schaick JM, Westert GP, Burgers JS. Why don't physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners. Implement Sci. 2009;4:54. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-54.
22. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989;13:319-340.
23. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179-211.
24. Thompson RL, Higgins CA, Howell J. Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly. 1991;15:125-143.
25. Ajzen I. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J Applied Social Psychol. 2002;32:665-683.
26. Bender DE, Ewbank D. The focus group as a tool for health research: issues in design and analysis. Health Transit Rev. 1994;4:63-80.
27. Laken MA, Dawson R, Engelman O, et al. Comparative effectiveness research in the "real" world: lessons learned in a study of treatment-resistant hypertension. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2013;7:95-101.
28. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus Groups. Participants in a focus group. A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2009:63-84.
29. Sim J. Collecting and analysing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group. J Adv Nurs. 1998;28:345-352.
30. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277-1288.
31. Logan AG, Dunai A, McIsaac WJ, et al. Attitudes of primary care physicians and their patients about home blood pressure monitoring in Ontario. J Hypertens. 2008;26:446-452.
32. Shum K, Alperin P, Shalnova S, et al. Simulating the impact of improved cardiovascular risk interventions on clinical and economic outcomes in Russia. PLoS One. 2014;9:e103280.
33. Mar. J, Rodriguez-Artalejo F. Which is more important for the efficiency of hypertension treatment: hypertension stage, type of drug or therapeutic compliance? J Hypertens. 2001;19:149-155.
34. Lomas J. Diffusion and dissemination implementation: who should do what? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;703:226-235.
35. Zwolsman S, Te Pas E, Hooft L, et al. Barriers to GPs' use of evidence-based medicine: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62:e511-e521.
36. Swennen MH, Van Der Heijden GJ, Boeije HR, et al. Doctors' perceptions and use of evidence-based medicine: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Acad Med. 2013;88:1384-1396.
37. Bridges J, Loukanova S, Carrera P. Empowerment and health care. In: Heggenhougen K, Quah S, eds. International Encyclopedia of Public Health. San Diego: Academic Press; 2008:17-28.
38. Carrera PM, Dalton AR. Do-it-yourself healthcare: the current landscape, prospects and consequences. Maturitas. 2014;77:37-40.
39. Newman S, Cooke D. Conclusions. In: Newman S, Steed E, Mulligan K, eds. Chronic Physical Illness: Self-Management and Behavioral Interventions. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Open University Press; 2008.
40. Struik MH, Koster F, Schuit AJ, et al. The preferences of users of electronic medical records in hospitals: quantifying the relative importance of barriers and facilitators of an innovation. Implement Sci. 2014;9:69. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-69.
41. Van Engen-Verheul MM, De Keizer NF, Van Der Veer SN, et al. Evaluating the effect of a web-based quality improvement system with feedback and outreach visits on guideline concordance in the field of cardiac rehabilitation: rationale and study protocol. Implement Sci. 2014;9:780. doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0131-y.
42. Carlsen B, Glenton C, Pope C. Thou shalt versus thou shalt not: a meta-synthesis of GPs' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57:971-978.
43. Tuttas CA. Lessons learned using Web conference technology for online focus group interviews. Qual Health Res. 2015;25:122-133.
44. Niessen MA, Van Der Hoeven NV, Van Den Born BJ, et al. Home blood pressure measurement as a screening tool for hypertension in a web-based worksite health promotion programme. Eur J Public Health. 2014;24:776-781.
45. Pickering TG, Miller NH, Ogedegbe G, et al. Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008;23:299-323.
46. Lambooij MS, Hummel MJ. Differentiating innovation priorities among stakeholder in hospital care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:91.