Home blood pressure measurement as a screening tool for hypertension in a web-based worksite health promotion programme

European Journal of Public Health

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 776-781

  Niessen, Maurice A J ^a   Van Der Hoeven, Niels V ^a,b   Van Den Born, Bert Jan H ^b   Van Kalken, Coen K ^a   Kraaijenhagen, Roderik A ^a  

^a NIPED   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; DEVICES; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF CARE; WORKPLACE;

AREA UNDER CURVE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF CARE; WORKPLACE;

EID: 84928479244     PISSN: 11011262     EISSN: 1464360X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt144     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-Analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002;360:1903-13.
2. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, et al. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet 2005;365:217-23.
3. Agyemang C, Bindraban N, Mairuhu G, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among Black Surinamese, South Asian Surinamese and White Dutch in Amsterdam, The Netherlands: the SUNSET study. J. Hypertens 2005;23:1971-77.
4. Costanzo S, Di CA, Zito F, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in healthy unrelated male-female pairs of European regions: the dietary habit profile in European communities with different risk of myocardial infarction-the impact of migration as a model of gene-environment interaction project. J. Hypertens 2008;26:2303-11.
5. Efstratopoulos AD, Voyaki SM, Baltas AA, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Hellas, Greece: the Hypertension Study in General Practice in Hellas (HYPERTENSHELL) national study. Am. J. Hypertens 2006;19: 53-60.
6. Egan BM, Zhao Y, Axon RN. US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988-2008. JAMA 2010;303:2043-50.
7. Falaschetti E, Chaudhury M, Mindell J, Poulter N. Continued improvement in hypertension management in England: results from the Health Survey for England 2006. Hypertension 2009;53:480-6.
8. Ebrahim S, Taylor F, Ward K, et al. Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease. Cochrane. Database. Syst. Rev 2011: CD001561.
9. Groeneveld IF, Proper KI, van der Beek AJ, et al. Lifestyle-focused interventions at the workplace to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease-A systematic review. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2010;36:202-15.
10. Foote A, Erfurt JC. Hypertension control at the work site. Comparison of screening and referral alone, referral and follow-up, and on-site treatment. N. Engl. J. Med 1983;308:809-13.
11. Mancia G, Bertinieri G, Grassi G, et al. Effects of blood-pressure measurement by the doctor on patient's blood pressure and heart rate. Lancet 1983;2: 695-98.
12. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J. Hypertens 2007;25:1105-87.
13. Daskalopoulou SS, Khan NA, Quinn RR, et al. The 2012 Canadian hypertension education program recommendations for the management of hypertension: blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, and therapy. Can. J. Cardiol 2012;28:270-87.
14. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Hypertension: the clinical management of primary hypertension in adults, CG127. NICE, 2011.
15. Little P, Barnett J, Barnsley L, et al. Comparison of acceptability of and preferences for different methods of measuring blood pressure in primary care. BMJ 2002;325: 258-59.
16. Stergiou GS, Bliziotis IA. Home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension: a systematic review. Am. J. Hypertens 2011;24:123-34.
17. Stergiou GS, Baibas NM, Gantzarou AP, et al. Reproducibility of home, ambulatory, and clinic blood pressure: implications for the design of trials for the assessment of antihypertensive drug efficacy. Am. J. Hypertens 2002;15(2 Pt. 1):101-4.
18. Hond ED, Celis H, Fagard R, et al. Self-measured versus ambulatory blood pressure in the diagnosis of hypertension. J. Hypertens 2003;21:717-22.
19. Bobrie G, Chatellier G, Genes N, et al. Cardiovascular prognosis of 'masked hypertension' detected by blood pressure self-measurement in elderly treated hypertensive patients. JAMA 2004;291:1342-49.
20. Fagard RH, Van Den Broeke C, De CP. Prognostic significance of blood pressure measured in the office, at home and during ambulatory monitoring in older patients in general practice. J. Hum. Hypertens 2005;19:801-7.
21. Ohkubo T, Imai Y, Tsuji I, et al. Home blood pressure measurement has a stronger predictive power for mortality than does screening blood pressure measurement: a population-based observation in Ohasama, Japan. J. Hypertens 1998;16:971-75.
22. Sega R, Facchetti R, Bombelli M, et al. Prognostic value of ambulatory and home blood pressures compared with office blood pressure in the general population: follow-up results from the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study. Circulation 2005;111:1777-83.
23. Niiranen TJ, Hanninen MR, Johansson J, et al. Home-measured blood pressure is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular risk than office blood pressure: the Finn-Home study. Hypertension 2010;55:1346-51.
24. Ward AM, Takahashi O, Stevens R, Heneghan C. Home measurement of blood pressure and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-Analysis of prospective studies. J. Hypertens 2012;30:449-56.
25. Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, et al. European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. J. Hypertens 2008;26:1505-26.
26. Conroy RM, Pyorala K, Fitzgerald AP, et al. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur. Heart J 2003;24:987-1003.
27. Zaetta V, Daniele L, Perkovic D, et al. Validation of the SAA-102 home blood pressure monitor according to the protocols of the European Society of Hypertension, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and the British Society of Hypertension. Blood Press Monit 2007;12:363-8.
28. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29-36.
29. van der Hoeven NV, van den Born BJ, Cammenga M, van Montfrans GA. Poor adherence to home blood pressure measurement schedule. J. Hypertens 2009;27: 275-9.
30. Benetos A, Thomas F, Bean KE, Guize L. Why cardiovascular mortality is higher in treated hypertensives versus subjects of the same age, in the general population. J. Hypertens 2003;21:1635-40.
31. Blokstra A, Vissink P, Venmans LMAJ, et al. Nederland de Maat Genomen. Monitoring van risicofactoren in de algemene bevolking. 2009-2010 (Measuring the Netherlands. A monitoring study of risk factors in the general population, 2009-2010). RIVM-rapport nr. 260152001/2011. Bilthoven, 2011.
32. Households (with at least one person aged 16-74) with internet access in Europe, 2011. Statistics Netherlands (CBS). http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/bedrijven/publicaties/digitale-economie/artikelen/2012-3636-wm.htmn (in Dutch). (13 September 2013, date last accessed).