Differentiating innovation priorities among stakeholder in hospital care

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Lambooij, Mattijs S ^a   Hummel, Marjan J ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Hospital care; Implementation; Information technology; Innovation; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL STAFF; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; UNITED KINGDOM; GREAT BRITAIN; PSYCHOLOGY;

DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; PATIENT CARE;

EID: 84881498679     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-91     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Is technological change in medicine worth it? Cutler DM, McClellan M, Health Aff 2001 20 11 29
2. Medical care costs: how much welfare loss? Newhouse JP, J Econ Perspect 1992 6 3 21 10128078
3. OECD annual report 2008. OECD, Book OECD Annual Report 2008 Paris, France: The Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development, OECD, 2008
4. Theories on implementation of change in healthcare. Grol R, Wensing M, Hulscher M, Eccles M, The implementation of change in clinical practice Edinburgh: Elsevier, Eccles M, Wensing M, Grol R, 2005 15 57
5. Information technology and automation in hospitals: strategies and experience in a tertiary hospital in Spain. Alonso AH, González CGR, Sáez MS, EJHP Pract 2011 17 26 31
6. The productivity impact of the voice link between elderly and nurses: an assisted living facility pilot. Valkila N, Saari A, Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2011 52 44 e49 10.1016/j.archger.2010.05.008 20627429
7. Addressing the business of discharge: building a case for an electronic discharge summary. Mourad M, Cucina R, Ramanathan R, Vidyarthi AR, J Hosp Med 2011 6 37 42 10.1002/jhm.818 20872869
8. Electronic medical record systems in critical access hospitals: leadership perspectives on anticipated and realized benefits. Mills TR, Vavroch J, Bahensky JA, Ward MM, Perspect Health Inf Manag 2010 7 1c April 21063544
9. Faculty, resident, and clinic staff's evaluation of the effects of EHR implementation. Bloom MV, Huntington MK, Fam Med 2010 42 562 566 20830621
10. Organization-wide adoption of computerized provider order entry systems: a study based on diffusion of innovations theory. Rahimi B, Timpka T, Vimarlund V, Uppugunduri S, Svensson M, Med Inform Decis Mak 2009 9 52 10.1186/1472-6947-9-52
11. Rogers EM, Diffusion of innovations New York: Free Press 1962
12. The relationship between physician practice characteristics and physician adoption of electronic health records. Bramble JD, Galt KA, Siracuse MV, Abbott AA, Drincic A, Paschal KA, Fuji KT, Health Care Manage Rev 2010 35 55 64 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181c3f9ad 20010013
13. The impact of electronic medical record systems on outpatient workflows: a longitudinal evaluation of its workflow effects. Vishwanath A, Singh SR, Winkelstein P, Int J Med Inform 2010 79 778 791 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.09.006 20947415
14. Evaluation of features to support safety and quality in general practice clinical software. Sweidan M, Williamson M, Reeve JF, Harvey K, O'Neill JA, Schattner P, Snowdon T, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011 11 11 10.1186/1472-6947- 11-11 21324182
15. Clinician attitudes toward and use of electronic problem lists: a thematic analysis. Wright A, Maloney FL, Feblowitz JC, Wright A, Maloney FL, Feblowitz JC, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011 11 36 10.1186/1472-6947-11-36 21612639
16. Understanding managerial behaviour during initial steps of a clinical information system adoption. Rodríguez C, Pozzebon M, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011 11 42 10.1186/1472-6947-11-42 21682885
17. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Milbank Q 2004 82 581 629 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x 15595944
18. Has information technology finally been adopted in Flemish intensive care units? Colpaert K, Vanbelleghem S, Danneels C, Benoit D, Steurbaut K, Van Hoecke S, De Turck F, Decruyenaere J, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2010 10 62 10.1186/1472-6947-10-62 20958955
19. The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, Blumenthal D, Health Aff 2011 30 3 464 471 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0178
20. Grounding a new information technology implementation framework in behavioral science: a systematic analysis of the literature on IT use. Kukafkaa R, Johnson SB, Linfante A, Allegrante JP, J Biomed Inform 2003 36 218 227 10.1016/j.jbi.2003.09.002 14615230
21. Why innovation in health care is so hard. Herzlinger RE, Book Why innovation in health care is so hard vol. Product 4303 Boston USA: Harvard Business Review 2006
22. Limits to the diffusion of innovation. A literature review and integrative model. MacVaugh J, Schiavone F, Eur J Innov Manag 2010 13 197 221 10.1108/14601061011040258
23. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Garcia R, Catalone R, J Prod Innov Manag 2002 19 110 132 10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00132-1
24. Success and failure of innovation: a literature review. Gvd P, Van Beers C, Kleinknecht A, Int J Innov Manag 2003 7 1 30 10.1142/S1363919603000714
25. The nonspread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals. Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M, Hawkins C, Acad Manage J 2005 48 117 134 10.5465/AMJ.2005.15993150
26. Redesigning work processes in health care: lessons from the National Health Service. Ham C, Kipping R, Mcleod H, Milbank Q 2003 81 415 439 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-3-00062 12941002
27. Freeman RE, Strategic Management: A stakeholder Approach Boston, MA: Pitman 1984
28. Medical technology and professional dominance theory. Greer AL, Soc Sci Med 1984 18 809 817 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90148-5 6729509
29. The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: a literature review. Liberatore MJ, Nydick RL, Eur J Oper Res 2008 189 1 194 207 189:194-207 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.001
30. A systematic review of the analytic hierarchy process in health care decision making. Hummel JM, IJzerman MJ, Value Health 2009 12 7 227
31. Assessment of the added value of the twente photoacoustic mammoscope in breast cancer diagnosis. Hilgerink MP, Hummel JM, Manohar S, Med Devices (Auckl) 2011 2011 107 115
32. Using the analytic hierarchy process to elicit patient preferences: prioritizing multiple outcome measures of antidepressant drug treatment. Hummel JM, Volz F, van Manen JG, Danner M, et al. The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Res 2012 5 225 237
33. Saaty TL, Analytic hierarchy process. Planning, prioroty setting, resource allocation New York: McGraw-Hill 1980