Process verification of a hydrological model using a temporal parameter sensitivity analysis

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 4365-4376

  Pfannerstill, M ^a   Guse, B ^a   Reusser, D ^b   Fohrer, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; CLIMATE MODELS; DYNAMICS; HYDROLOGY; RUNOFF;

HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; HYDROLOGICAL PROCESS; PARAMETER SENSITIVITIES; PARAMETER SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; PROCESS VERIFICATIONS; SIMULATED PROCESS; TEMPORAL SENSITIVITY;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CATCHMENT; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; MODEL VALIDATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

EID: 84946564893     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-19-4365-2015     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R.: Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Mmodel development, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 1, 73-89, doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x, 1998.
2. BGR: Bundesanstalt fuer Geowisschenschaften und Rohstoffe - Bodenuebersichtskarte im Maßstab 1 : 200.000, Verbreitung der Bodengesellschaften, 1999.
3. Boyle, D. P., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods, Water. Resour. Res., 36, 3663-3674, doi:10.1029/2000wr900207, 2000.
4. Boyle, D. P., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Koren, V., Zhang, Z., and Smith, M.: Toward improved streamflow forecasts: Value of semidistributed modeling, Water. Resour. Res., 37, 2749-2759, doi:10.1029/2000WR000207, 2001.
5. Cibin, R., Sudheer, K. P., and Chaubey, I.: Sensitivity and identifiability of stream flow generation parameters of the SWAT model, Hydrol. Process., 24, 1133-1148, doi:10.1002/hyp.7568, 2010.
6. Clark, M. P., McMillan, H. K., Collins, D. B. G., Kavetski, D., and Woods, R. A.: Hydrological field data from a modellers perspective: Part 2: process-based evaluation of model hypotheses, Hydrol. Process., 25, 523-543, doi:10.1002/hyp.7902, 2011.
7. Cloke, H., Pappenberger, F., and Renaud, J.-P.: Multi-method global sensitivity analysis (MMGSA) for modelling floodplain hydrological processes, Hydrol. Process., 22, 1660-1674, doi:10.1002/hyp.6734, 2008.
8. Cukier, R. I., Fortuin, C. M., Shuler, K. E., Petschek, A. G., and Schaibly, J. H.: Study of sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. 1. Theory, J. Chem. Phys., 59, 3873-3878, doi:10.1063/1.1680571, 1973.
9. Cukier, R. I., Schaibly, J. H., and Shuler, K. E.: Study of sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. 3. Analysis of approximations, J. Chem. Phys., 63, 1140-1149, doi:10.1063/1.431440, 1975.
10. Cukier, R. I., Levine, H. B., and Shuler, K. E.: Non-linear sensitivity analysis of multi-parameter model systems, J. Comput. Phys., 26, 1-42, doi:10.1016/0021-9991(78)90097-9, 1978.
11. DWD: Weather and climate data from the German Weather Service (DWD) of the station Flensburg (1961-1990), Online climate data, 2012.
12. Euser, T., Winsemius, H. C., Hrachowitz, M., Fenicia, F., Uhlenbrook, S., and Savenije, H. H. G.: A framework to assess the realism of model structures using hydrological signatures, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1893-1912, doi:10.5194/hess-17-1893- 2013, 2013.
13. Fenicia, F., Savenije, H., and Winsemius, H.: Moving from model calibration towards process understanding, Phys. Chem. Earth, 33, 1057-1060, doi:10.1016/j.pce.2008.06.008, 2008.
14. Fohrer, N. and Schmalz, B.: Das UNESCO Oekohydrologie- Referenzprojekt Kielstau-Einzugsgebiet - Nachhaltiges Wasserressourcenmanagement und Ausbildung im laendlichen Raum, Hydrol. Wasserbewirts., 4, 160-168, doi:10.5675/HyWa-2012,4-1, 2012.
15. Fohrer, N., Schmalz, B., Tavares, F., and Golon, J.: Modelling the landscape water balance of mesoscale lowland catchments considering agricultural drainage systems, Hydrol. Wasserbewirts., 51, 164-169, 2007.
16. Fohrer, N., Dietrich, A., Kolychalow, O., and Ulrich, U.: Assessment of the Environmental Fate of the Herbicides Flufenacet and Metazachlor with the SWAT Model, J. Environ. Qual., 42, 1-11, doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0382, 2013.
17. Garambois, P. A., Roux, H., Larnier, K., Castaings, W., and Dartus, D.: Characterization of process-oriented hydrologic model behavior with temporal sensitivity analysis for flash floods in Mediterranean catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2305-2322, doi:10.5194/hess-17-2305-2013, 2013.
18. Gupta, H. V., Wagener, T., and Liu, Y.: Reconciling theory with observations: Elements of a diagnostic approach to model evalution, Hydrol. Process., 22, 3802-3813, doi:10.1002/hyp.6989, 2008.
19. Gupta, H. V., Clark, M. P., Vrugt, J. A., Abramowitz, G., and Ye, M.: Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy, Water Resour. Res., 48, W08301, doi:10.1029/2011WR011044, 2014.
20. Guse, B., Reusser, D. E., and Fohrer, N.: How to improve the representation of hydrological processes in SWAT for a lowland catchment - Temporal analysis of parameter sensitivity and model performance, Hydrol. Process., 28, 2651-2670, doi:10.1002/hyp.9777, 2014.
21. Guse, B., Pfannerstill, M., and Fohrer, N.: Dynamic modelling of land use change impacts on nitrate loads in rivers, Environ. Process., 1-18, doi:10.1007/s40710-015-0099-x, 2015.
22. Haas, M., Guse, B., Pfannerstill, M., and Fohrer, N.: Detection of dominant nitrate processes in ecohydrological modelling with temporal parameter sensitivity analysis, Ecol. Model., 314, 62-71, doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.07.009, 2015.
23. Herbst, M., Gupta, H. V., and Casper, M. C.: Mapping model behaviour using Self-Organizing Maps, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 395-409, doi:10.5194/hess-13-395-2009, 2009.
24. Herman, J. D., Reed, P. M., and Wagener, T.: Time-varying sensitivity analysis clarifies the effects of watershed model formulation on model behavior, Water Resour. Res., 49, 1400-1414, doi:10.1002/wrcr.20124, 2013.
25. Hrachowitz, M., Fovet, O., Ruiz, L., Euser, T., Gharari, S., Nijzink, R., Freer, J., Savenije, H., and Gascuel-Odoux, C.: Process consistency in models: The importance of system signatures, expert knowledge, and process complexity,Water Resour. Res., 50, 7445-7469, doi:10.1002/2014wr015484, 2014.
26. Kiesel, J., Schmalz, B., and Fohrer, N.: SEPAL - a simple GISbased tool to estimate sediment pathways in lowland catchments, Adv. Geosci., 21, 25-32, doi:10.5194/adgeo-21-25-2009, 2009.
27. Kiesel, J., Fohrer, N., Schmalz, B., and White, M. J.: Incorporating landscape depressions and tile drainages of a northern German lowland catchment into a semi-distributed model, Hydrol. Process., 24, 1472-1486, doi:10.1002/hyp.7607, 2010.
28. Kirchner, J. W.: Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 42, W03S04, doi:10.1029/2005WR004362, 2006.
29. LVermA: Landesvermessungsamt Schleswig-Holstein - Digitales Gelandemodell fuer SchleswigHolstein. Quelle: TK25. Gitterweite 25m×25m und TK50 Gitterweite 50m×50m sowie ATKIS-DGM2-1m×1m Gitterweite und DGM 5m×5m Gitterweite abgeleitet aus LiDAR-Daten 1995.
30. Martinez, G. and Gupta, H.: Hydrologic consistency as a basis for assessing complexity of monthly water balance models for the continental United States: Hydrologic consistency and model complexity, Water Resour. Res., 47, W12540, doi:10.1029/2011WR011229, 2011.
31. Massmann, C., Wagener, T., and Holzmann, H.: A new approach to visualizing time-varying sensitivity indices for environmental model diagnostics across evaluation time-scales, Environ. Model. Softw., 51, 190-194, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.033, 2014.
32. Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., and Williams, J. R.: SWAT Theoretical Documentation Version 2009, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, 2011.
33. Nossent, J., Elsen, P., and Bauwens, W.: Sobol sensitivity analyses of a complex environmental model, Environ. Model. Softw., 26, 1515-1525, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.010, 2011.
34. Oesterle, H.: Reconstruction of daily global radiation for past years for use in agricultural models, Phys. Chem. Earth. Part B, 26, 253-256, doi:10.1016/S1464-1909(00)00248-3, 2001.
35. Pfannerstill, M., Guse, B., and Fohrer, N.: A multi-storage groundwater concept for the SWAT model to emphasize nonlinear groundwater dynamics in lowland catchments, Hydrol. Process., 28, 5599-5621, doi:10.1002/hyp.10062, 2014a.
36. Pfannerstill, M., Guse, B., and Fohrer, N.: Smart low flow signature metrics for an improved overall performance evaluation of hydrological models, J. Hydrol., 510, 447-458, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.044, 2014b.
37. Razavi, S. and Gupta, H. V.: What do we mean by sensitivity analysis? The need for comprehensive characterization of "global" sensitivity in Earth and Environmental systems models, Water Resour. Res., 51, 3070-3092, doi:10.1002/2014WR016527, 2015.
38. R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013.
39. Reusser, D.: Implementation of the Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST), R-package, 0.61, 2012.
40. Reusser, D. E. and Zehe, E.: Inferring model structural deficits by analyzing temporal dynamics of model performance and parameter sensitivity, Water Resour. Res., 47, W07550, doi:10.1029/2010WR009946, 2011.
41. Reusser, D. E., Blume, T., Schaefli, B., and Zehe, E.: Analysing the temporal dynamics of model performance for hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 999-1018, doi:10.5194/hess-13- 999-2009, 2009.
42. Reusser, D. E., Buytaert, W., and Zehe, E.: Temporal dynamics of model parameter sensitivity for computationally expensive models with FAST (Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test), Water Resour. Res., 47, W07551, doi:10.1029/2010WR009947, 2011.
43. Saltelli, A. and Bolado, R.: An alternative way to compute Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST), Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 26, 445-460, doi:10.1016/S0167-9473(97)00043-1, 1998.
44. Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Tarantola, S., and Campolongo, F.: Sensitivity analysis practices: Strategies for modelbased inference, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 91, 1109-1125, doi:10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.014, 2006.
45. Schmalz, B., Springer, P., and Fohrer, N.: Interactions between nearsurface groundwater and surface water in a drained riparian wetland, in: Proceedings of International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics XXIV General Assemble A New Focus on Integrated Analysis of Groundwater/Surface Water Systems, Perugia, Italy, 11-13 July 2007, 21-29, IAHS Press, 2008.
46. Sieber, A. and Uhlenbrook, S.: Sensitivity analyses of a distributed catchment model to verify the model structure, J. Hydrol., 310, 216-235, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.01.004, 2005.
47. Sudheer, K. P., Lakshmi, G., and Chaubey, I.: Application of a pseudo simulator to evaluate the sensitivity of parameters in complex watershed models, Environ. Model. Softw., 26, 135-143, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.07.007, 2011.
48. van Griensven, A., Meixner, T., Grundwald, S., Bishop, T., Diluzio, M., and Srinivasan, R.: A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models, J. Hydrol., 324, 10-23, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.008, 2006.
49. van Werkhoven, K., Wagener, T., Reed, P., and Tang, Y.: Sensitivity-guided reduction of parametric dimensionality for multi-objective calibration of watershed models, Adv. Water Resour., 32, 1154-1169, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.03.002, 2009.
50. Wagener, T., Boyle, D. P., Lees, M. J., Wheater, H. S., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: A framework for development and application of hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 13-26, doi:10.5194/hess-5-13-2001, 2001.
51. Wagener, T., McIntyre, N., Lees, M., Wheater, H., and Gupta, H.: Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling: Dynamic identifiability analysis, Hydrol. Process., 17, 455-476, doi:10.1002/hyp.1135, 2003.
52. Wagener, T., Reed, P., van Werkhoven, K., Tang, Y., and Zhang, Z.: Advances in the identification and evaluation of complex environmental systems models, J. Hydroinform., 11, 266, doi:10.2166/hydro.2009.040, 2009.
53. Yilmaz, K. K., Gupta, H. V., and Wagener, T.: A process-based diagnostic approach to model evaluation: Application to the NWS distributed hydrologic model, Water Resour. Res., 44, W09417, doi:10.1029/2007WR006716, 2008.