Access to research inputs: open science versus the entrepreneurial university

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1050-1063

  Czarnitzki, Dirk ^a   Grimpe, Christoph ^b,c   Pellens, Maikel ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Copenhagen Business School ^*  (Denmark)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN ECONOMIC RESEARCH ZEW   (Germany)

Author keywords

Industry sponsorship; Open science; Research funding; Research inputs

Indexed keywords

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

ACCESS TO RESEARCH; ENTREPRENEURIAL UNIVERSITY; EXTERNAL FUNDING; INDUSTRY FUNDING; LIFE-SCIENCES; OPEN SCIENCE; PUBLIC DISCLOSURES; RESEARCH FUNDING;

FINANCE;

EID: 84946496932     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-015-9392-0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., & Stein, J. (2008). Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation. RAND Journal of Economics,39(3), 617–635.
2. Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2009). The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality, and direction of (public) research output. Journal of Industrial Economics,57(4), 637–676.
3. Azoulay, P., Furman, J. Krieger, J., Murray, F. (2012). Retractions. NBER Working Papers No. 18499, Cambridge (MA).
4. Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Anderson, M. S., Causino, N., & Seashore-Louis, K. (1997). Withholding research results in academic life science. Journal of the American Medical Association,277(15), 1224–1228.
5. Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Causino, N., & Seashore-Louis, K. (1996a). Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. The New England Journal of Medicine,335(23), 1734–1739.
6. Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Gokhale, M., Yucel, R., Clarridge, B., Hilgartner, S., & Holtzman, N. A. (2006). Data withholding in genetics and other life sciences: Prevalences and practices. Academic Medicine,81(2), 137–145.
7. Blumenthal, D., Causino, N., Campbell, E. G., & Seashore-Louis, K. (1996b). Relationships between academic institutions and industry in the life sciences—an industry survey. The New England Journal of Medicine,334(6), 368–373.
8. Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M., Seashore-Louis, K., Stoto, M. A., & Wise, D. (1986). University-industry research relationships in biotechnology: Implications for the university. Science Magazine,232(4756), 1361–1366.
9. Callaway, E. (2011). Fraud investigation rocks Danish university. Nature. Retrieved from www.nature.com/news/2011/110107/full/news.2011.703.html. doi:10.1038/news.2011.703.
10. Campbell, E. G., Clarridge, B. R., Gohale, M., Birenbaum, L., Hilgartner, S., Holtzman, N. A., & Blumenthal, D. (2002). Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. Journal of the American Medical Association,287(4), 473–480.
11. Campbell, E., Weissman, J., Causino, N., & Blumenthal, D. (2000). Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials. Research Policy,29, 303–312.
12. Cohen, W. M., Florida, R., Randazzese, L., & Walsh, J. P. (1998). Industry and the academy: Uneasy partners in the cause of technical advance. In R. G. Noll (Ed.), Challenges to research universities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
13. Czarnitzki, D., Grimpe, C., Toole, A.A. (2011). Delay and secrecy: Does industry sponsorship jeopardize disclosure of academic research? ZEW Discussion Paper No. 11-009, Mannheim.
14. Dasgupta, P., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy,23(5), 487–521.
15. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy,32(1), 109–121.
16. Gans, J.S., Murray, F. (2011). Funding scientific knowledge: Selection, disclosure, and the public-private portfolio. NBER Working Papers No. 16980, Cambridge (MA).
17. Grimpe, C. (2012). Extramural research grants and scientists’ funding strategies: Beggars cannot be choosers? Research Policy,41(8), 1448–1460.
18. Grimpe, C., & Hussinger, K. (2013). Formal and informal technology transfer from academia to industry: Complementarity effects and innovation performance. Industry and Innovation,20(8), 683–700.
19. Haeussler, C. (2011). Information-sharing in academia and the industry: A comparative study. Research Policy,40(1), 105–122.
20. Haeussler, C., Jiang, L., Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. (2014). Specific and general information sharing among competing academic researchers. Research Policy,43(3), 465–475.
21. Hong, W., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). For money or glory? Commercialization, competition and secrecy in the entrepreneurial university. Sociological Quarterly,50(1), 145–171.
22. Hwang, W. S., Roh, S. Il., Lee, B. C., Kang, S. K., Kwon, D. K., Kim, S., et al. (2005). Patient-specific embryonic stem cells derived from human SCNT blastocysts. Science,308(5729), 1777–1783. doi:10.1126/science.1112286.
23. OECD (2010). Main science and technology indicators 2010, Paris.
24. Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2007). University licensing. Oxford Review of Economic Policy,23(4), 620–639.
25. Toole, A. A., & Czarnitzki, D. (2010). Commercializing science: Is there a university ‘brain drain’ from academic entrepreneurship? Management Science,56(9), 1599–1614.
26. Walsh, J. P., Cohen, W. M., & Cho, C. (2007). Where excludability matters: material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research. Research Policy,36, 1184–1203.