A fuzzy extended analytic network process-based approach for global supplier selection

Applied Intelligence

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 760-772

  Zhang, Xiaoge ^a,b   Deng, Yong ^a,b   Chan, Felix T S ^c   Mahadevan, Sankaran ^b  

^a SOUTHWEST UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Analytic network process; Fuzzy set theory; Supplier selection

Indexed keywords

DECISION THEORY; FUZZY SETS; SET THEORY; SUPPLY CHAINS;

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; EXPERT JUDGEMENT; GLOBAL SUPPLIERS; NOVEL METHODOLOGY; REAL-WORLD; SUPPLIER SELECTION; UNCERTAIN INFORMATIONS;

FUZZY SET THEORY;

EID: 84946491254     PISSN: 0924669X     EISSN: 15737497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-015-0664-z     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Boran FE, Genċ S, Kurt M, Akay DA (2009) multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with topsis method. Expert Syst Appl 36(8):11,363–11,368
2. Cattaneo ME (2011) Belief functions combination without the assumption of independence of the information sources. Int J Approx Reason 52(3):299–315
3. Chai J, Liu JN, Xu ZA (2012) new rule-based sir approach to supplier selection under intuitionistic fuzzy environments. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems 20(03):451–471
4. Chamodrakas I, Martakos DA (2012) utility-based fuzzy topsis method for energy efficient network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. Appl Soft Comput 12(7): 1929–1938
5. Chan F, Kumar N (2007) Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended ahp-based approach. Omega 35(4):417–431
6. Chan F, Kumar N, Tiwari M, Lau H, Choy K (2008) Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-ahp approach. Int J Prod Res 46(14):3825–3857
7. Chang D (1992) Extent analysis decision, synthetic. Optimization Techniques and Applications 1(5):352
8. Chen N, Xu Z, Xia M (2013) Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowl Based Syst 37:528–540
9. Chiou H, Tzeng G, Cheng D (2005) Evaluating sustainable fishing development strategies using fuzzy mcdm approach. Omega 33(3):223–234
10. Chou S, Chang YA (2008) Decision support system for supplier selection based on a strategy-aligned fuzzy smart approach. Expert Syst Appl 34(4):2241–2253
11. Deng X, Hu Y, Deng Y, Mahadevan S (2014a) Environmental impact assessment based on d numbers. Expert Syst Appl 41(2):635–643
12. Deng X, Hu Y, Deng Y, Mahadevan S (2014b) Supplier selection using ahp methodology extended by d numbers. Expert Syst Appl 41(1):156–167
13. Deng Y, Chan F, Wu Y, Wang D A (2011) New linguistic mcdm method based on multiple-criterion data fusion. Expert Syst Appl 38(6):6985–6993
14. Denœux T (2008) Conjunctive and disjunctive combination of belief functions induced by nondistinct bodies of evidence. Artif Intell 172(2):234–264
15. Gencer C, Gürpinar D (2007) Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm. Appl Math Model 31(11):2475–2486
16. Hafeez K, Zhang Y, Malak N (2002) Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 76(1):39–51
17. Handfield R, Walton SV, Sroufe R, Melnyk SA (2002) Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 141(1):70–87
18. Hu Z, Du X, Kolekar NS, Banerjee A (2014) Robust design with imprecise random variables and its application in hydrokinetic turbine optimization. Eng Optim 46(3):393–419
19. Kang B, Deng Y, Sadiq R, Mahadevan S (2012) Evidential cognitive maps. Knowl Based Syst 35:77–86
20. Kang H, Lee A (2010) Inventory replenishment model using fuzzy multiple objective programming: A case study of a high-tech company in taiwan. Appl Soft Comput 10(4):1108–1118
21. Keramati A, Salehi M (2012) Website success comparison in the context of e-recruitment: An analytic network process (anp) approach. Appl Soft Comput 13(1):173–180
22. Krohling RA, de Souza T (2012) Combining prospect theory and fuzzy numbers to multi-criteria decision making. Expert Systems with Applications 39(13):11, 487–11, 493
23. Kuo M, Liang G (2011) Combining vikor with gra techniques to evaluate service quality of airports under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 38(3):1304–1312
24. Kuo M, Liang G (2012) A soft computing method of performance evaluation with mcdm based on interval-valued fuzzy numbers. Appl Soft Comput 12(1):476–485
25. Kuo MS (2011) A novel interval-valued fuzzy mcdm method for improving airlines?? service quality in chinese cross-strait airlines. Transportation Research Part E. Logistics and Transportation Review 47(6):1177–1193
26. Kuo R, Lin Y (2012) Supplier selection using analytic network process and data envelopment analysis. Int J Prod Res 50(11):2852–2863
27. Larrodé E, Moreno-Jiménez J, Muerza M (2012) An ahp-multicriteria suitability evaluation of technological diversification in the automotive industry. Int J Prod Res 50(17):4889–4907
28. Levy JK, Hall J (2005) Advances in flood risk management under uncertainty. Stoch Env Res Risk A 19(6):375–377
29. Li D (2010) Linear programming method for madm with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Expert Syst Appl 37(8):5939–5945
30. Li D, Wang Y, Liu S (2009) Shan F Fractional programming methodology for multi-attribute group decision-making using ifs. Appl Soft Comput 9(1):219–225
31. Miodragović R, Tanasijević M, Mileusnić Z, Jovanċić P (2012) Effectiveness assessment of agricultural machinery based on fuzzy sets theory. Expert Syst Appl 39(10): 8940–8946
32. Pang J, Liang J (2012) Evaluation of the results of multi-attribute group decision-making with linguistic information. Omega 40(3):294–301
33. Pei Z, Zheng L (2012) A novel approach to multi-attribute decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Expert Syst Appl 39(3):2560–2566
34. Saaty T (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 48 (1):9–26
35. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resources allocation. McGraw-Hill International Book Co. (New York and London), London, McGraw-Hill
36. Saaty TL (1996) Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process
37. Sandeep M, Kumanan S, Vinodh S (2011) Supplier selection using combined ahp and gra for a pump manufacturing industry. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management 10 (1):40–52
38. Shyur HJ (2006) Cots evaluation using modified topsis and anp. Appl Math Comput 177(1):251–259
39. Su X, Mahadevan S, Xu P, Deng Y (2014) Handling of dependence in dempster–shafer theory
40. Tseng M (2011) Green supply chain management with linguistic preferences and incomplete information. Appl Soft Comput 11(8):4894–4903
41. Ustun O et al (2008) An integrated multi-objective decision-making process for multi-period lot-sizing with supplier selection. Omega 36(4):509–521
42. Wei D, Deng X, Zhang X, Deng Y, Mahadevan S (2013) Identifying influential nodes in weighted networks based on evidence theory. Physica A. Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 392(10):2564–2575
43. Wei G (2010) Gra method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Knowl Based Syst 23(3):243–247
44. Wu C, Barnes D, Rosenberg D, Luo X (2009) An analytic network process-mixed integer multi-objective programming model for partner selection in agile supply chains. Prod Plan Control 20(3):254–275
45. Yang JL, Chiu HN, Tzeng GH, Yeh RH (2008) Vendor selection by integrated fuzzy mcdm techniques with independent and interdependent relationships. Inf Sci 178(21):4166–4183
46. Zadeh L (1965a) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353
47. Zadeh LA (1965b) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353
48. Zarghami M, Szidarovszky F (2009) Revising the owa operator for multi criteria decision making problems under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 198(1):259–265
49. Deng Y (2015) Generalized evidence theory. Appl Intell. doi:10.1007/s10489-015-0661-2