Distinguishing between the success and precision of recollection

Memory

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 114-127

  Harlow, Iain M ^a   Yonelinas, Andrew P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Episodic memory; Precision; Recollection

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EPISODIC MEMORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; RECALL; REPRODUCIBILITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, EPISODIC; MENTAL RECALL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84946489996     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: 14640686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2014.988162     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. M.Aly,, C.R.Ranganath,, & A.P.Yonelinas, (2013). Detecting changes in scenes: The hippocampus is critical for strength-based perception. Neuron, 78, 1127–1137. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.018
2. P.M.Bays,, R.F.G.Catalao,, & M.Husain,. (2009). The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. Journal of Vision, 9, 1–11. doi:10.1167/9.10.7
3. F.I.M.Craik,, R.Govoni,, M.Naveh-Benjamin,, & N.D.Anderson,. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159–180. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.159
4. L.T.DeCarlo,. (2003). An application of signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions to source discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 767–778. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.767
5. J.M.Gardiner,. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16, 309–313. doi:10.3758/BF03197041
6. I.M.Harlow,, & D.I.Donaldson,. (2013). Source accuracy data reveal the thresholded nature of human episodic memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 318–325. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0340-9
7. M.W.Howard,, B.Bessette-Symons,, Y.Zhang,, & W.J.Hoyer,. (2006). Aging selectively impairs recollection in recognition memory for pictures: Evidence from modeling and receiver operating characteristic curves. Psychology and Aging, 21(1), 96–106. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.96
8. L.L.Jacoby,. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F
9. A.Koriat,, M.Goldsmith,, & A.Pansky,. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481–537.
10. L.L.Light,, M.W.Prull,, D.J.La Voie,, & M.R.Healy,. (2000). Dual process theories of memory in old age. In T.J.Perfect & E.A.Maylor (Eds.), Models of cognitive aging (pp. 238–300). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. L.Mickes,, E.M.Johnson,, & J.T.Wixted,. (2010). Continuous recollection vs. unitized familiarity in associative recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 843–863. doi:10.1037/a0019755
12. S.V.Onyper,, Y.X.Zhang,, & M.W.Howard,. (2010). Some-or-none recollection: Evidence from item and source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 341–364. doi:10.1037/a0018926
13. C.M.Parks,, & A.P.Yonelinas,. (2009). Evidence for a memory threshold in second-choice recognition memory responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 11515–11519. doi:10.1073/pnas.0905505106
14. J.M.Scimeca,, I.M.McDonough,, & D.A.Gallo,. (2011). Quality trumps quantity at reducing memory errors: Implications for retrieval monitoring and mirror effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(4), 363–377.
15. E.Tulving,. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychologist, 26(1), 1–12. doi:10.1037/h0080017
16. S.D.Vann,, D.Tsivilis,, C.E.Denby,, J.R.Quamme,, A.P.Yonelinas,, J.P.Aggleton,, A.R.Mayes,. (2009). Impaired recollection but spared familiarity in patients with extended hippocampal system damage revealed by 3 convergent methods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 5442–5447. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812097106
17. A.P.Yonelinas,. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341–1354. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1341
18. A.P.Yonelinas,. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517. doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864
19. A.P.Yonelinas,. (2013). The hippocampus supports high-resolution binding in the service of perception, working memory and long-term memory. Behavioral Brain Research, 254, 34–44.
20. A.P.Yonelinas,, M.Aly,, W.-C.Wang,, & J.D.Koen,. (2010). Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions. Hippocampus, 20, 1178–1194.
21. A.P.Yonelinas,, & C.M.Parks,. (2007). Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 800–832. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.800
22. W.Zhang,, & S.J.Luck,. (2009). Sudden death and gradual decay in visual working memory. Psychological Science, 20, 423–428. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02322.x