Computer versus physician identification of gastrointestinal alarm features

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 84, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1111-1117

  Almario, Christopher V ^a,b,c   Chey, William D ^d   Iriana, Sentia ^a   Dailey, Francis ^a   Robbins, Karen ^a   Patel, Anish V ^a   Reid, Mark ^a,b   Whitman, Cynthia ^a   Fuller, Garth ^a   Bolus, Roger ^a   Dennis, Buddy ^c   Encarnacion, Rey ^c   Martinez, Bibiana ^a,b   Soares, Jennifer ^a,b   Modi, Rushaba ^a,b,c   Agarwal, Nikhil ^a,b,c   Lee, Aaron ^a   Kubomoto, Scott ^a   Sharma, Gobind ^a   Bolus, Sally ^a   Chang, Lin ^c   Spiegel, Brennan M R ^a,b   more..

^a CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b VA GREATER LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Alarm features; Checklists; Patient provider portal

Indexed keywords

ALARM SYSTEMS; ALGORITHMS; DIAGNOSIS;

ALARM FEATURES; AUTOMATED EVALUATION; CHECKLISTS; COMPUTER GENERATED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS; INTER QUARTILE RANGES; WILCOXON SIGNED RANK TEST;

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ALGORITHM; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DECREASED APPETITE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FEVER; GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOM; HEALTH CARE; HEMATEMESIS; HUMAN; INFORMATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MELENA; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM HEMORRHAGE; SELF REPORT; UNINTENTIONAL WEIGHT LOSS; WEIGHT REDUCTION; ANAMNESIS; CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES; MICHIGAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT;

ALGORITHMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES; HUMANS; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; MICHIGAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84946475608     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Blumenthal D. Launching HITECH. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362:382-385.
2. DesRoches C.M., Charles D., Furukawa M.F., et al. Adoption of electronic health records grows rapidly, but fewer than half of US hospitals had at least a basic system in 2012. Health Aff. (Millwood) 2013, 32:1478-1485.
3. Miller R.H., Sim I. Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff. (Millwood) 2004, 23:116-126.
4. Embi P.J., Yackel T.R., Logan J.R., et al. Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2004, 11:300-309.
5. Handler T., Holtmeier R., Metzger J., et al. HIMSS electronic health record definitional model version 1.0. The Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) Electronic Health Record Committee 2003.
6. Burke H.B., Hoang A., Becher D., et al. QNOTE: an instrument for measuring the quality of EHR clinical notes. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2014, 21:910-916.
7. Burke H.B., Sessums L.L., Hoang A., et al. Electronic health records improve clinical note quality. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2015, 22:199-205.
8. Roshanov P.S., Gerstein H.C., Hunt D.L., et al. Impact of a computerized system for evidence-based diabetes care on completeness of records: a before-after study. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2012, 12. 63.
9. Almario C.V., Chey W., Kaung A., et al. Computer-generated vs. physician-documented history of present illness (HPI): results of a blinded comparison. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 110:170-179.
10. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 2002;123:2105-7.
11. Bharucha A.E., Dorn S.D., Lembo A., et al. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on constipation. Gastroenterology 2013, 144:211-217.
12. Kahrilas P.J., Shaheen N.J., Vaezi M.F., et al. American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 2008, 135:1383-1391. e1-5.
13. Katz P.O., Gerson L.B., Vela M.F. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 108:308-328. quiz 329.
14. Rubio-Tapia A., Hill I.D., Kelly C.P., et al. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2013, 108:656-676. quiz 677.
15. Talley N.J., Vakil N. Guidelines for the management of dyspepsia. Am. J. Gastroenterol 2005, 100:2324-2337.
16. Patel P., Bercik P., Morgan D.G., et al. Prevalence of organic disease at colonoscopy in patients with symptoms compatible with irritable bowel syndrome: cross-sectional survey. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 50:816-823.
17. Spiegel B.M., Hays R.D., Bolus R., et al. Development of the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) gastrointestinal symptom scales. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 109:1804-1814.
18. Borchard A., Schwappach D.L., Barbir A., et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness, compliance, and critical factors for implementation of safety checklists in surgery. Ann. Surg. 2012, 256:925-933.
19. Thomassen O., Storesund A., Softeland E., et al. The effects of safety checklists in medicine: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2014, 58:5-18.
20. Gawande A. The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right 2009, Metropolitan Books, New York, NY.
21. Lucas G.M., Gratch J., King A., et al. It's only a computer: virtual humans increase willingness to disclose. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014, 37:94-100.
22. Ford A.C., Van Zanten S.V., Rodgers C.C., et al. Diagnostic utility of alarm features for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 2008, 57:1545-1553.
23. van Zanten S.V. Review alarm features in dyspepsia do not have high diagnostic accuracy for predicting upper gastrointestinal cancer. Evid. Based Med. 2007, 12:55.
24. Bowrey D.J., Griffin S.M., Wayman J., et al. Use of alarm symptoms to select dyspeptics for endoscopy causes patients with curable esophagogastric cancer to be overlooked. Surg. Endosc. 2006, 20:1725-1728.