Integrating Mental Practice with Task-specific Training and Behavioral Supports in Poststroke Rehabilitation. Evidence, Components, and Augmentative Opportunities

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 715-727

  Peters, Heather T ^a   Page, Stephen J ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Mental practice; Motor imagery; Rehabilitation; Stroke; The PRACTICE principles

Indexed keywords

ARM DISEASE; BEHAVIORAL SUPPORT; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; HUMAN; LEARNING; MENTAL PRACTICE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PRACTICE PRINCIPLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REPETITIVE TASK SPECIFIC PRACTICE; REVIEW; SELF CONCEPT; SKILL RETENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TREATMENT PLANNING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MENTAL FUNCTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; STROKE; UPPER LIMB;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; MENTAL PROCESSES; MOTOR SKILLS; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84946471515     PISSN: 10479651     EISSN: 15581381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2015.06.004     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Krishnamurthi R.V., Feignin V.L., Forouzanfar M.H., et al. Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet Glob Health 2013, 1:e259-e281.
2. Lozano R., Naghavi M., Foreman K., et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012, 380:2095-2128.
3. Murray C.J., Vos T., Lozano R., et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012, 380:2197-2223.
4. Feigin V.L., Forouzanfar M.H., Mensah G.A., et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2014, 383:245-254.
5. Wolf S.L., Winstein C.J., Miller J.P., et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006, 296:2095-2104.
6. Page S.J., Levine P., Leonard A. Mental practice in chronic stroke: results of a randomized, placebo controlled trial. Stroke 2007, 38:1293-1297.
7. Page S.J., Boe S., Levine P. What are the "ingredients" of modified constraint-induced therapy? An evidence based review, recipe, and recommendations. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2013, 31:299-309.
8. Nudo R.J. Plasticity. NeuroRx 2006, 3:420-427.
9. Dunning K., Berberich A., Albers B., et al. A four-week, task-specific neuroprosthesis program for a person with no active wrist or finger movement because of chronic stroke. Phys Ther 2008, 88:397-405.
10. Hill-Hermann V., Strasser A., Albers B., et al. Task-specific, patient-driven neuroprosthesis training in chronic stroke: results of a 3-week clinical study. Am J Occup Ther 2008, 62:466-472.
11. Page S.J., Maslyn S., Hermann V.H., et al. Activity-based electrical stimulation training in a stroke patient with minimal movement in the paretic upper extremity. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009, 23:595-599.
12. Page S.J., Levin L., Hermann V., et al. Longer versus shorter daily durations of electrical stimulation during task specific practice in moderately impaired stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012, 2:200-206.
13. Page S.J., Peters H. Mental practice: applying motor PRACTICE and neuroplasticity principles to increase upper extremity function. Stroke 2014, 45:3454-3460.
14. Page S.J. Imagery improves upper extremity motor function in chronic stroke patients: a pilot study. Occ Ther J Res 2000, 20:200-215.
15. Hewitt T.E., Ford K., Levine P., et al. Reaching kinematics to measure motor changes after mental practice in stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007, 14:23-29.
16. Page S.J., Levine P., Leonard A.C. Effects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 86:399-402.
17. Page S.J., Szaflarski J.P., Eliassen J., et al. Cortical plasticity following motor skill learning during mental practice in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009, 23:382-388.
18. Sharp K.G., Gramer R., Butler L., et al. Effect of overground training augmented by mental practice on gait velocity in chronic, incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014, 95:615-621.
19. Page S.J., Harnish S.M. Thinking about better speech: mental practice for stroke-induced motor speech impairments. Aphasiology 2012, 26:127-142.
20. Grooms D, Page SJ, Onate J. Cortical control of jump landing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed individuals. Abstract submitted to 7th World Congress of Biomechanics. Boston, July 6, 2014.
21. Liu K.P., Chan C.C., Wong R.S., et al. A randomized controlled trial of mental imagery augment generalization of learning in acute poststroke patients. Stroke 2009, 40:2222-2225.
22. Muller K., Butefisch C.M., Seitz R.J., et al. Mental practice improves hand function after chronic stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007, 25:501-511.
23. Riccio I., Iolascon G., Barillari M.R., et al. Mental practice is effective in upper limb recovery after stroke: a randomized single-blind cross-over study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2010, 46:19-25.
24. Lee M.M., Cho H.Y., Song C.H. The mirror therapy program enhances upper-limb motor recovery and motor function in acute stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012, 91:689-696.
25. Decety J. Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate?. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1996, 3:87-93.
26. Decety J. The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behav Brain Res 1996, 77:45-52.
27. Decety J., Ingvar D.H. Brain structures participating in mental simulation of motor behavior: a neuropsychological interpretation. Acta Psychol 1990, 73:13-34.
28. Weiss T., Hansen E., Beyer L., et al. Activation processes during mental practice in stroke patients. Int J Psychophysiol 1994, 17:91-100.
29. Ito M. Movement and thought: identical control mechanisms by the cerebellum. Trends Neurosci 1993, 16:453-454.
30. Malouin F., Richards C.L., Durand A., et al. Added value of mental practice combined with a small amount of physical practice on the relearning of rising and sitting post-stroke: a pilot study. J Neurol Phys Ther 2009, 33:195-202.
31. Braun S.M., Beurskens A.J., Kleynen M., et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare subacute 'treatment as usual' with and without mental practice among persons with stroke in Dutch nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2012, 13:e1-e7.
32. Hosseini S.A., Fallahpour M., Sayadi M., et al. The impact of mental practice on stroke patients' postural balance. J Neurol Sci 2012, 15:263-267.
33. Schuster C., Butler J., Andrews B., et al. Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: results of a randomised controlled pilot trial. Trials 2012, 13:11.
34. Page S.J., Levine P., Sisto S.A., et al. Mental practice combined with physical practice for upper-limb motor deficit in subacute stroke. Phys Ther 2001, 81:1455-1462.
35. Page S.J., Dunning K., Hermann V. Longer versus shorter mental practice sessions for affected upper extremity movement after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2011, 25:627-637.
36. Dijkerman H.C., Letswaart M., Johnston M., et al. Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients? A pilot study. Clin Rehabil 2004, 18:538-549.
37. Liu K.P., Chan C.C., Lee T.M., et al. Mental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004, 85:1403-1408.
38. Bovend'Eert T.J., Dawes H., Sackley C., et al. An integrated motor imagery program to improve functional task performance in neurorehabilitation: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010, 91:939-946.
39. Letswaart M., Johnston M., Dijkerman H.C., et al. Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Brain 2011, 134:1373-1386.
40. Page S.J., Levine P., Khoury J.C. Modified constraint-induced therapy combined with mental practice: thinking through better motor outcomes. Stroke 2009, 40:551-554.
41. Law M., Baptiste S., McColl M., et al. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 1990, 57:82-87.
42. Kleim J.A., Jones T.A. Principles of experience-dependent neuroplasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008, 51:S225-S239.
43. Bobath B. Adult hemiplegia evaluation and treatment 1990, Butterworth, London.
44. Radomski M.V., Trombley C.A. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction 2007, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.
45. Dobkin B. Strategies in rehabilitation. Lancet 2004, 3:528-536.
46. Schmitt R and Lee T. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2011.
47. Murphy S.M. Imagery interventions in sport. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994, 26:486-494.
48. Paivio A. Cognitive and motivational functions of imagery in human performance. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1985, 10:22S-28S.
49. Kehdr E.M., Abdel-Fadeil M.R., Farghali A., et al. Role of 1 and 3 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function recovery after acute ischaemic stroke. Eur J Neurol 2009, 16:1323-1330.
50. Liepert J., Zittel S., Weiller C. Improvement of dexterity by single session low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex in acute stroke: a double-blind placebo controlled crossover trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007, 25:461-465.
51. Takeuchi N., Chuma T., Matsuo Y., et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke 2005, 36:2681-2686.
52. Kim Y.H., You S.H., Ko M.H., et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke 2006, 37:1471-1476.
53. Facchini S., Muellbacher W., Battaglia F., et al. Focal enhancement of motor cortex excitability during motor imagery: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Acta Neurol Scand 2002, 105:146-151.
54. Izumi S.I., Findley T.W., Ikai T., et al. Facilitatory effect of thinking about movement on motor-evoked potentials to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995, 74:262-268.
55. Cicinelli P., Marconi B., Zaccagnini M., et al. Imagery-induced cortical excitability changes in stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cereb Cortex 2006, 16:247-253.
56. Quartarone A., Morgante F., Bagnato S., et al. Long lasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor imagery. Neuroreport 2004, 15:1287-1291.
57. Foerster A., Rocha S., Wiesiolek C., et al. Site-specific effects of mental practice combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning. Eur J Neurosci 2012, 37:786-789.