A multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare subacute 'treatment as usual' with and without mental practice among persons with stroke in dutch nursing homes

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 85.e1-85.e7

  Braun, Susy M ^a,b   Beurskens, Anna J ^a   Kleynen, Melanie ^a   Oudelaar, Bart ^a   Schols, Jos M ^b,c,d   Wade, Derick T ^d,e  

^a ZUYD UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c Vivre   (Netherlands)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e OXFORD CENTRE FOR ENABLEMENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Mental practice; Movement imagery; RCT; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRAIL ELDERLY; HUMAN; IMAGERY; KINESTHESIA; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL PRACTICE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NURSING HOME; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REHABILITATION CARE; STROKE;

EID: 84855170297     PISSN: 15258610     EISSN: 15389375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Kwakkel G., van Peppen R., Wagenaar R.C., et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: A meta-analysis. Stroke 2004, 35:2529-2539.
2. Jackson P.L., Lafleur M.F., Malouin F., et al. Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001, 82:1133-1141.
3. Bernhardt J., Chan J., Nicola I., Collier J.M. Little therapy, little physical activity: Rehabilitation within the first 14 days of organized stroke unit care. JRehabil Med 2007, 39:43-48.
4. Braun S.M., Beurskens A.J., Borm P.J., et al. The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006, 87:842-852.
5. Sharma N., Pomeroy V.M., Baron J.C. Motor imagery: A backdoor to the motor system after stroke?. Stroke 2006, 37:1941-1952.
6. Langhorne P., Coupar F., Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009, 8:741-754.
7. Schols J.M., Crebolder H.F., van Weel C. Nursing home and nursing home physician: The Dutch experience. JAm Med Dir Assoc 2004, 5:207-212.
8. Braun S.M., Beurskens A.J., van Kroonenburgh S.M., et al. Effects of mental practice embedded in daily therapy compared to therapy as usual in adult stroke patients in Dutch nursing homes: Design of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Neurol 2007, 7:34.
9. Altman D.G., Schulz K.F., Moher D., et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001, 134:663-694.
10. Tombaugh T.N., McIntyre N.J. The Mini-Mental State Examination: Acomprehensive review. JAm Geriatr Soc 1992, 40:922-935.
11. Revalidatie na een beroerte, richtlijnen en aanbevelingen voor zorgverleners [Rehabilitation after stroke, guidelines and recommendations]. Den Haag: Nederlandse Hartstichting 2001, Commissie CVA-revalidatie.
12. Braun S.M., van Hoastregt J.C., Beurskens A.J., et al. Feasibility of a mental practice intervention in stroke patients in nursing homes: A process evaluation. BMC Neurol 2010, (accepted).
13. Braun S.M., Kleynen M., Schols J.M., et al. Using mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: A framework. Clin Rehabil 2008, 22:579-591.
14. Milton J., Small S.L., Solodkin A. Imaging motor imagery: Methodological issues related to expertise. Methods 2008, 45:336-341.
15. Malouin F., Richards C.L., Doyon J., et al. Training mobility tasks after stroke with combined mental and physical practice: A feasibility study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2004, 18:66-75.
16. Gould D., Damarjian N., Greenleaf C. Imagery training for peak performance. Exploring Sport and Exercise Psychology 2002, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, P. 49-74. J. Raalte van, W.B. Brewer (Eds.).
17. Kalra L., Eade J. Role of stroke rehabilitation units in managing severe disability after stroke. Stroke 1995, 26:2031-2034.
18. Wewers M.E., Lowe N.K. Acritical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 1990, 13:227-236.
19. Donnelly C., Carswell A. Individualized outcome measures: A review of the literature. Can J Occup Ther 2002, 69:84-94.
20. Stratford P., Gill C., Westaway M., Binkley J. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: A report of patient specific measure. Physiother Can 1995, 47:258-263.
21. Garraway W.M., Akhtar A.J., Prescott R.J., Hockey L. Management of acute stroke in the elderly: Preliminary results of a controlled trial. Br Med J 1980, 280:1040-1043.
22. Oxford Grice K., Vogel K.A., Le V., et al. Adult norms for a commercially availableNine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 2003, 57:570-573.
23. Blum L., Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. Phys Ther 2008, 88:559-566.
24. Lennon S., Johnson L. The modified Rivermead Mobility Index: Validity and reliability. Disabil Rehabil 2000, 22:833-839.
25. Hankey G.J., Deleo D., Stewart-Wynne E.G. Stroke units: An Australian perspective. Aust N Z J Med 1997, 27:437-438.
26. Assmann S.F., Pocock S.J., Enos L.E., Kasten L.E. Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials. Lancet 2000, 355:1064-1069.
27. Kollen B., Kwakkel G., Lindeman E. Functional recovery after stroke: Areview of current developments in stroke rehabilitation research. Rev Recent Clin Trials 2006, 1:75-80.
28. Twisk J.W. Applied longitudinal data analysis for epidemiology 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29. Braun S.M., Schack T., Marcellis R.G., et al. Is it possible to use the Structural Dimension Analysis of Motor memory (SDA-M) to investigate representations of motor actions in stroke patients?. Clin Rehabil 2007, 21:822-832.
30. Kleynen M., Schoenmakers M., Braun S.M. Stel je voor, het werkt. Mentale training bij een chronische CVA patiënt: Een case report [Imagine it works:Mental practice in a patient after stroke in the chronic phase of recovery; A case report]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Fysiotherapie 2009, 119:48-54.
31. Page S.J. Imagery improves upper extremity motor functions in chronic stroke patients with hemiplegia: A pilot study. Occup Ther J Res 2000, 20:200-215.
32. Page S.J., Levine P., Leonard A.C. Effects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 86:399-402.
33. Page S.J., Levine P., Sisto S., Johnston M.V. Arandomized efficacy and feasibility study of imagery in acute stroke. Clin Rehabil 2001, 15:233-240.
34. Liu K.P., Chan C.C., Lee T.M., Hui-Chan C.W. Mental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004, 85:1403-1408.
35. Dijkerman H.C., Lietswaart M., Johnston M., MacWalter R.S. Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients? A pilot study. Clin Rehabil 2004, 18:538-549.
36. Craig P., Dieppe P., Macintyre S., et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008, 337:a1655.
37. Johnson-Frey S.H. Stimulation through simulation? Motor imagery and functional reorganization in hemiplegic stroke patients. Brain Cogn 2004, 55:328-331.
38. Martin K., Moritz S., Hall C. Imagery use in sports: A literature review and applied model. The Sports Psychologist 1999, 13:245-268.
39. Simmons L., Sharma N., Baron J.C., Pomeroy V.M. Motor imagery to enhance recovery after subcortical stroke: Who might benefit, daily dose, and potential effects. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008, 22:458-467.