Toward a Dose-Response Account of Media Priming

Communication Research

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1089-1115

  Arendt, Florian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

dose response; media priming; newspapers; stereotype

Indexed keywords

EID: 84946409181     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650213482970     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. J.Anderson (1976). Language, memory, and thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. C.AndersonB.Bushman (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51.
3. M.Appel (2011). A story about a stupid person can make you act stupid (or smart): Behavioral assimilation (and contrast) as narrative impact. Media Psychology, 14, 144-167.
4. F.Arendt (2010). Cultivation effects of a newspaper on reality estimates and explicit and implicit attitudes. Journal of Media Psychology, 22, 147-159.
5. F.Arendt (2012). A newspaper’s effect on the strength of the automatic associations in memory. Journal of Media Psychology, 24, 1-8.
6. F.Arendt (2013). News stereotypes, time, and fading priming effects. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(2), 347-362.
7. J.A.Bargh (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R.S.WyerT.K.Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition. Vol. 1: Basic processes (2nd ed., pp. 1-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. J.A.BarghR.N.BondW.LombardiM.Tota (1986). The additive nature of chronic and temporary sources of construct accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 869-878.
9. J.Brehm (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
10. S.BrehmJ.Brehm (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York, NY: Academic Press.
11. J.BryantM.B.Oliver (Eds.). (2009). Media effects. Advances in theory and research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
12. B.Bushman (1998). Priming effects of media violence on the accessibility of aggressive constructs in memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 537-545.
13. F.CarpentierD.Roskos-EwoldsenB.Roskos-Ewoldsen (2008). A test of the network models of political priming. Media Psychology, 11, 186-206.
14. A.CollinsE.Loftus (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
15. A.DechêneC.StahlJ.HansenM.Wänke (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 238-257.
16. P.Devine (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
17. T.L.Dixon (2006). Psychological reactions to crime news portrayals of Black criminals: Understanding the moderating roles of prior news viewing and stereotype endorsement. Communication Monographs, 73, 162-187.
18. T.Dixon (2007). Black criminals and white officers: The effects of racially misrepresenting law breakers and law defenders on television news. Media Psychology, 10, 270-291.
19. T.Dixon (2009). “He was a Black guy”: How news’ misrepresentation of crime creates fear of Blacks. In R.A.Lind (Ed.), Race/gender/media: Considering diversity across audiences, content, and producers (pp. 24-29). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
20. T.DixonK.Maddox (2005). Skin tone, crime news, and social reality judgments: Priming the stereotype of the dark and dangerous black criminal. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1555-1570.
21. J.DovidioJ.BrighamB.JohnsonS.Gaertner (1996). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination: Another look. In C.N.MacraeC.StangorM.Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 276-319). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22. W.P.Eveland (1997). Interactions and nonlinearity in mass communication: Connecting theory and methodology. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 400-416.
23. H.Fidler (2008). Österreichs Medienwelt von A bis Z [Austria’s mass media from A to Z]. Vienna, Austria: Falter Verlagsgesellschaft m.b.H.
24. S.GaertnerJ.Dovidio (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J.DovidioS.Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25. S.GandiniE.BotteriS.IodiceM.BoniolA.LowenfelsP.MaisonneuveP.Boyle (2008). Tobacco smoking and cancer: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Cancer, 122, 155-164.
26. B.GawronskiK.PetersP.BrochuF.Strack (2008). Understanding the relations between different forms of racial prejudice: A cognitive consistency perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 648-665.
27. S.C.GrantG.D.Logan (1993). The loss of repetition priming and automaticity over time as a function of degree of initial learning. Memory & Cognition, 21, 611-618.
28. C.HansenR.Hansen (1988). How rock music videos can change what is seen when boy meets girl: Priming stereotypic appraisal of social interactions. Sex Roles, 19, 287-316.
29. R.HastieB.Park (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268.
30. E.T.HigginsJ.A.BarghW.Lombardi (1985). Nature of priming effects on categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 59-69.
31. E.Hodgson (2004). A textbook of modern toxicology (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
32. M.HoggG.Vaughan (2005). Social psychology. Edinburgh Gate, UK: Pearson Education.
33. S.IyengarD.KinderM.PetersJ.Krosnick (1984). The evening news and presidential evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 778-787.
34. S.JeongH.ChoY.Hwang (2012). Media literacy interventions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 62, 454-472.
35. K.KawakamiJ.DovidioS.van Kamp (2007). The impact of counterstereotypic training and related correction processes and the application of stereotypes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 139-156.
36. A.LangD.Ewoldsen (2010). Beyond effects: Conceptualizing communication as dynamic, complex, nonlinear, and fundamental. In S.Allan (Ed.), Rethinking communication. Keywords in communication research (pp. 109-120). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
37. D.Mastro (2009). Effects of racial and ethnic stereotyping. In J.BryantM.B.Oliver (Eds.), Media effects. Advances in theory and research (pp. 325-341). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
38. W.McGuire (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental and social psychology (pp. 191-229). New York, NY: Academic Press.
39. T.McNamara (2005). Semantic priming. Perspectives from memory and word recognition. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
40. J.M.MillerJ.A.Krosnick (1996). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: A program of research on the priming hypothesis. In D.MutzP.Sniderman (Eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change (pp. 79-100). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
41. Paracelsus. (1574). Septem defensiones. Basel, Switzerland: Perna.
42. V.PriceD.Tewksbury (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G.A.BarnettF.J.Boster (Eds.), Progress in the communication sciences (pp. 173-212). New York, NY: Ablex.
43. M.Quillian (1967). Word concepts: A theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. Behavioral Science, 12, 410-430.
44. E.ReijmersdalP.NeijensE.Smit (2009). A new branch of advertising. Reviewing factors which influence reactions to product placements. Journal of Advertising Research, 49, 429-440.
45. K.Riddle (2010). Always on my mind: Exploring how frequent, recent, and vivid television portrayals are used in the formation of social reality judgments. Media Psychology, 13, 155-179.
46. D.R.Roskos-EwoldsenM.R.KlingerB.R.Roskos-Ewoldsen (2007). Media priming: A meta-analysis. In R.W.PreissB.M.GayleN.BurrellM.AllenJ.Bryant (Eds.), Mass media effects research (pp. 53-80). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. D.R.Roskos-EwoldsenB.Roskos-EwoldsenF.D.Carpentier (2009). Media priming. An updated synthesis. In J.BryantM.B.Oliver (Eds.), Media effects. Advances in theory and research (pp. 74-93). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
48. M.A.Shapiro (1991). Memory and decision processes in the construction of social reality. Communication Research, 18(1), 3-24.
49. L.J.Shrum (2009). Media consumption and perceptions of social reality: Effects and underlying processes. In J.BryantM.B.Oliver (Eds.), Media effects. Advances in theory and research (pp. 50-73). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
50. T.K.SrullR.S.Wyer (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
51. R.TaylorF.NajafiA.Dobson (2007). Meta-analysis of studies of passive smoking and lung cancer: Effects of study type and content. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36, 1048-1059.
52. A.TverskyD.Kahneman (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
53. N.Valentino (1999). Crime news and the priming of racial attitudes during evaluations of the president. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 293-320.
54. D.T.WegenerR.E.Petty (1995). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naïve theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36-51.
55. D.T.WegenerR.E.Petty (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naïve theories of bias in bias correction. In M.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141-208). New York, NY: Academic Press.