A test of the network models of political priming

Media Psychology

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 186-206

  Dillman Carpentier, Francesca R ^a,c   Roskos Ewoldsen, David R ^b   Roskos Ewoldsen, Beverly B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^c University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46049098970     PISSN: 15213269     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15213260801994220     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Bizer, G. Y., & Petty, R. E. (2005). How we conceptualize our attitudes matters: The effects of valence framing on the resistance of political attitudes. Political Psychology, 26, 553-568.
3. Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
6. Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Memory, 8, 240-247.
7. D'Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2002). Selective exposure and dissonance after decisions. Psychological Reports, 91.
8. Domke, D., Shah, D. V., & Wackman, D. B. (1998). Media priming effects: Accessibility, association, and activation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10, 51-74.
9. Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. F. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238.
10. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: The Guilford Press.
11. Higgins, E. T., Bargh, J. A., & Lombardi, W. (1985). Nature of priming effects on categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 59-69.
12. Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S. & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.
13. Holbrook, R. A., & Hill, T. G. (2005). Agenda-setting and priming in prime time television: Crime dramas as political cues. Political Communication, 22, 277-295.
14. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
15. Iyengar, S., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., & Krosnick, J. A. (1984). The evening news and presidential evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 778-787.
16. Iyengar, S., Peters, M. D., & Kinder, D. R. (1982). Experimental demonstrations of the "not_so_minimal" consequences of television news programs. American Political Science Review, 76, 848-858.
17. Iyengar, S., & Ottati, V. (1994). Cognitive perspective in political psychology. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition, Volume 2: Applications, 2nd ed. (pp. 143-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. (1993). News coverage of the Gulf crisis and public opinion: A study of agenda-setting, priming, and framing. Communication Research, 20, 365-383.
19. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Kanouse, D. E., & Hanson, L. R., Jr. (1971). Negativity in evaluations. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. K. Kelly, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 47-62). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
21. Klapper, J. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. New York: Free Press.
22. Kleinbaum, D. G., & Kupper, L. L. (1978). Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Boston, MA: Duxbury.
23. Krosnick, J. A., & Brannon, L. A. (1993). The impact of the Gulf War on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: multidimensional effects of political involvement. American Political Science Review, 87, 963-975.
24. Krosnick, J. A., & Kinder, D. R. (1990). Alterning the foundations of support for the president through priming. American Political Science Review, 84, 497-512.
25. Lau, R. R. (1985). Two explanations for negativity effects in political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 119-138.
26. McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
27. Miller, J. M. (2007). Examining the mediators of agenda setting: A new experimental paradigm reveals the role of emotions. Political Psychology, 28, 689-717.
28. Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 295-309.
29. Neeley, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 225-254.
30. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1997). Priming and media impact on the evaluations of president's performance. Communication Research, 24, 3-30.
31. Peeters, G. (1991). Evaluative inference in social cognition: The roles of direct versus indirect evaluation and positive-negative asymmetry. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 131-146.
32. Price, L. J. (1996). Understanding the negativity effect: The role of processing focus. Business and Economics, 7(1), 53-62.
33. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (Vol. 13, pp. 173-212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
34. Quillian, M. (1968). Semantic memory. In M. Minsky (Ed.), Semantic information processing (pp. 227-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, R. T. (1997). The retrieval of situation-specific information. In M. A. Conway (Ed.), Cognitive models of memory (pp. 173-213). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (1997). Attitude accessibility and persuasion: Review and a transactivemodel. In B. Burleson's (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 20 (pp.185-225). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Bichsel, J., Hill, J., & Hoffman, K. (2002). The influence of accessibility of source likeability on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 137-143.
38. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992a). The accessibility of source likeability as a determinant of persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 19-25.
39. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992b). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object's attraction of visual attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 198-211.
40. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). The role of belief accessibility in attitude formation. Southern Communication Journal, 62, 107-116.
41. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Klinger, M., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2007). Media priming. In R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media theories and processes: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 53-80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B, & Dillman Carpentier, F. (2002). Media priming: A synthesis. In J. B. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects in theory and research 2nd ed. (pp. 97-120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Yu, H. J., & Rhodes, N. (2004). Fear appeal messages affect accessibility of attitudes toward the threat and adaptive behaviors. Communication Monographs, 71, 49-69.
44. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Models of media effects. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9-20.
45. Sheafer, T. (2007). How to evaluate it: The role of story-evaluative tone in agenda setting and priming. Journal of Communication, 51, 21-39.
46. Shrum, L. J. (1999). The relationship of television viewing with attitude strength and extremity: Implications for the cultivation effect. Media Psychology, 1, 3-26.
47. Shrum, L. J., & O'Guinn, T. C. (1993). Processes and effects in the construction of social reality. Communication Research, 20, 436-471.
48. Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review, 81, 214-241.
49. Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
50. Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1980). Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 841-856.
51. Valentino, N. A. (1999). Crime news and the priming of racial attitudes during evaluations of the president. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 293-320.
52. Valentino, N. A. (2001). Group priming in American elections. In R. P. Hart & D. Shaw (Eds.), Communication and U.S. elections: New agendas (pp. 145-165). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
53. Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., & White, I. K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 75-90.
54. Willnat, L., & Zhu, J.-H. (1996). Newspaper coverage and public opinion in Hong Kong: A time-series analysis of media priming. Political Communication, 13, 231-246.
55. Wood, W., Rhodes, N., & Biek, M. (1995). Working knowledge and attitude strength: An information-processing analysis. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 283-313). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Wyer, R. S., & Radvansky, G. A. (1999). The comprehension and validation of social information. Psychological Review, 106, 89-118.
57. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.