Perceptions of research risk and undue influence: Implications for ethics of research conducted with cocaine users

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 156, Issue , 2015, Pages 304-310

  Strickland, Justin C ^a   Stoops, William W ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical; Drugs; Ethics; Mechanical Turk; Substance use

Indexed keywords

COCAINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH BELIEF; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH ETHICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SCREENING TEST; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; COMORBIDITY; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; LOGIC; MOTIVATION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGY; REIMBURSEMENT; RESEARCH SUBJECT; RISK; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; COERCION; COMORBIDITY; CULTURE; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGIC; MALE; MOTIVATION; REIMBURSEMENT MECHANISMS; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84946398599     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: 18790046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.09.029     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adler M.W. Human subject issues in drug abuse research. College on problems of drug dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995, 37:167-175.
2. Anderson E.E., DuBois J.M. The need for evidence-based research ethics: a review of the substance abuse literature. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007, 86:95-105.
3. Beveridge T.J.R., Gill K.E., Hanlon C.A., Porrino L.J. Parallel studies of cocaine-related neural and cognitive impairment in humans and monkeys. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2008, 363:3257-3266.
4. Byrne M.M., Croft J.R., French M.T., Dugosh K.L., Festinger D.S. Development and preliminary results of the Financial Incentive Coercion Assessment questionnaire. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2012, 43:86-93.
5. Chung A., Lyoo I.K., Kim S.J., Hwang J., Bae S.C., Sung Y.H., Sim M.E., Song I.C., Kim J., Chang K.H., Renshaw P.F. Decreased frontal white-matter integrity in abstinent methamphetamine abusers. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2007, 10:765-775.
6. Crump M.J., McDonnell J.V., Gureckis T.M. Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e57410.
7. Elman I., Krause S., Breiter H.C., Gollub R.L., Heintges J., Baumgartner W.A., Rosen B.R., Gastfriend D.R. The validity of self-reported drug use in non-treatment seeking individuals with cocaine dependence: correlation with biochemical assays. Am. J. Addict. 2000, 9:216-221.
8. Emanuel E.J., Wendler D., Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical?. JAMA 2000, 283:2701-2711.
9. Festinger D.S., Dugosh K.L. Paying substance abusers in research studies: where does the money go?. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2012, 38:43-48.
10. Festinger D.S., Marlowe D.B., Croft J.R., Dugosh K.L., Mastro N.K., Lee P.A., Dematteo D.S., Patapis N.S. Do research payments precipitate drug use or coerce participation?. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005, 78:275-281.
11. Festinger D.S., Marlowe D.B., Dugosh K.L., Croft J.R., Arabia P.L. Higher magnitude cash payments improve research follow-up rates without increasing drug use or perceived coercion. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008, 96:128-135.
12. Fischman M.W., Johanson C.E. Ethical and practical issues involved in behavioral pharmacology research that administers drugs of abuse to human volunteers. Behav. Pharmacol. 1998, 9:479-498.
13. Fox S., Rainie L. The Web at 25 in the U.S. PewResearch Internet Project 2014, Retrieved from 〈http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/27/the-web-at-25-in-the-u-s/〉.
14. Fry C.L., Hall W., Ritter A., Jenkinson R. The ethics of paying drug users who participate in research: a review and practical. J. Empir. Res. Hum. Res. Ethics 2006, 4:21-36.
15. Hart C.L., Marvin C.B., Silver R., Smith E.E. Is cognitive functioning impaired in methamphetamine users?. A critical review. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012, 37:586-608.
16. Horton J.J., Chilton L.B. The labor economics of paid crowdsourcing. Proceedings from EC '10: the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce 2010, 209-218. ACM (Association for Computing Machinery), New York, NY. 10.1145/1807342.1807376.
17. Johnson P.S., Herrmann E.S., Johnson M.W. Opportunity costs of reward delays and the discounting of hypothetical money and cigarettes. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2015, 103:87-107.
18. Johnson P.S., Johnson M.W. Investigation of "bath salts" use patterns within an online sample of users in the United States. J. Psychoactive Drugs 2014, 46:369-378.
19. Kim S.J., Lyoo I.K., Hwang J., Chung A., Hoon Sung Y., Kim J., Kwon D.H., Chang K.H., Renshaw P.F. Prefrontal grey-matter changes in short-term and long-term abstinent methamphetamine abusers. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006, 9:221-228.
20. Koffarnus M.N., Bickel W.K. A 5-trial adjusting delay discounting task: accurate discount rates in less than one minute. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2014, 22:222-228.
21. Kokkevi A., Richardson C., Palermou B., Leventakou V. Reliability of drug dependents' self-reports. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997, 45:55-61.
22. Kurlander J.E., Simon-Dack S.L., Gorelick D.A. Spending of remuneration by subjects in non-treatment drug abuse research studies. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 2006, 32:527-540.
23. Largent E.A., Grady C., Miller F.G., Wertheimer A. Money, coercion, and undue inducement: attitudes about payments to research participants. IRB 2012, 34:1-8.
24. McClure E.A., Acquavita S.P., Harding E., Stitzer M.L. Utilization of communication technology by patients enrolled in substance abuse treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013, 129:145-150.
25. McCrady B.S., Bux D.A. Ethical issues in informed consent with substance abusers. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1999, 67:186-193.
26. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research 1979, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
27. Phillips T.B. A living wage for research subjects. J. Law Med. Ethics 2011, 39:243-253.
28. Potvin S., Stavro K., Rizkallah E., Pelletier J. Cocaine and cognition: a systematic quantitative review. J. Addict. Med. 2014, 8:368-376.
29. Roberts L.W., Warner T.D., Hammond K.G., Dunn L.B. Assessments by patients with schizophrenia and psychiatrists of relative risk of research procedures. Psychiatr. Serv. 2006, 57:1629-1635.
30. Shapiro D.N., Chandler J., Mueller P.A. Using Mechanical Turk to study clinical populations. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 2013, 1:213-220.
31. Simons D.J., Chabris C.F. Common (mis)beliefs about memory: a replication and comparison of telephone and Mechanical Turk survey methods. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e51876.
32. Slomka J., McCurdy S., Ratliff E.A., Timpson S., Williams M.L. Perceptions of financial payment for research participation among African-American drug users in HIV studies. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2007, 22:1403-1409.
33. Slomka J., Ratliff E.A., McCurdy S., Timpson S., Williams M.L. Perceptions of risk in research participation among underserved minority drug users. Subst. Use Misuse 2008, 43:1640-1652.
34. Strickland J.C., Wagner F.P., Stoops W.W., Rush C.R. Profile of Internet access in active cocaine users. Am. J. Addict. 2015, 24:582-585.
35. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration The NSDUH Report: Substance Use and Mental Health Estimates from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Overview of Findings 2014, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Rockville, MD.
36. United States Department of Justice The Economic Impact of Illicit Drug Use on American Society 2011, National Drug Intelligence Center, Washington, DC.
37. Vandrey R., Dunn K.E., Fry J.A., Girling E.R. A survey study to characterize use of Spice products (synthetic cannabinoids). Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012, 120:238-241.
38. Walker J. Informed choice and the concept of risk. RCM Midwives 2005, 8:40-41.
39. Wertheimer A., Miller F.G. Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?. J. Med. Ethics 2008, 34:389-392.