Money, coercion, and undue inducement: Attitudes about payments to research participants

IRB Ethics and Human Research

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-8

  Largent, Emily A ^a   Grady, Christine ^b   Miller, Franklin C ^b   Wertheimer, Alan ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; FEMALE; GIFT GIVING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERNET; MALE; MOTIVATION; PERSONNEL; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SEX DIFFERENCE;

COERCION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FEMALE; GIFT GIVING; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MOTIVATION; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 84858203312     PISSN: 01937758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Grady C. Payment of clinical research subjects. Journal of Clinical Investigation 2005;115(7):1681-1687; (Pubitemid 40979703)
2. Grady C, Dickert N, Jawetz T, et al. An analysis of U.S. practices of paying research participants. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2005;26(3):365-375. (Pubitemid 40725999)
3. Dickert N, Emanuel E, Grady C. Paying research subjects: An analysis of current policies. Annals of Internal Medicine 2002;136(5):368-373; (Pubitemid 34183995)
4. Ripley E, Macrina F, Markowitz M. Paying clinical research participants: One institution's research ethics committees' perspective. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2006;1(4):37-44.
5. Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Klitzman R. Voluntariness of consent to research: A preliminary empirical investigation. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 2009;31(6):10-14;
6. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1979;
7. Emanuel E. Undue Inducement: Nonsense on stilts. American Journal of Bioethics 2005;5(5):9-13;
8. Wertheimer A. Coercion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987;
9. Wertheimer A, Miller FG. Payment for research participation: A coercive offer? Journal of Medical Ethics 2008;34:389-392.
10. Code of Federal Regulations. Protection of Human Subjects. 45 CFR 46.
11. See ref. 3, The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research 1979.
12. Public Responsibility in Medicine & C Research. Mission, Values, and Vision. July 2011. http://www.primr.org/AboutUs.aspx?id=4463.
13. Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: Wiley and Sons, 2000.
14. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis 2nd ed. New York: Wiley and Sons, 2002;
15. Conover WJ. Practical Nonparametric Statistics 3rd ed. New York: Wiley and Sons, 1999.
16. Grady C, Dickert N, Jawetz T, et al. An analysis of U.S. practices of paying research participants. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2005;26(3):3e5-375;
17. Halpern SD, Karlawish J.H.T., Casarett D, et al. Empirical assessment of whether moderate payments are undue or unjust inducements for participation in clinical trials. Archives of Internal Medicine 2004;164:801-803; (Pubitemid 38478704)
18. Ripley E, Macrina F, Markowitz M, et al. Why do we pay? A national survey of investigators and IRB chairpersons. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2010;5(3):43-56.
19. Bentley JP, Thacker PG. The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision-making process. Journal of Medical Ethics 2004;30:293-298; (Pubitemid 38868081)
20. Slomka J, McCurdy S, Ratliff EA, et al. Perceptions of financial payment for research participation among African-American drug users in HIV studies. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2007;22:1403-1409. (Pubitemid 47476700)