The Integrative Self: How Self-Reference Integrates Perception and Memory

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 719-728

  Sui, Jie ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Decision making; Memory; Perception; Self reference

Indexed keywords

BINS; BRAIN; DATA STORAGE EQUIPMENT; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

BRAIN AREAS; BRAIN REGIONS; DIFFERENT STAGES; SELF-REFERENCES;

DECISION MAKING;

ATTENTION; BRAIN REGION; DECISION MAKING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEMORY; MENTAL DISEASE; PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION; RESPONSE TIME; REVIEW; SELF CONCEPT; SELF REFERENCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL SULCUS; VENTROMEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; MENTAL FUNCTION; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIATION RESPONSE;

DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MEMORY; MENTAL PROCESSES; PERCEPTION; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 84946230125     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.015     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. Freud S. The Ego and the Id 1949, The Hogarth Press.
2. James W. The Principles of Psychology 1890, Henry Holt.
3. Dennett D.C. The self as a center of narrative gravity. Self and Consciousness: Multiple Perspectives 1992, 103-115. Erlbaum. F. Kessel (Ed.).
4. Hood B. The Self Illusion: Why There is No 'You' Inside Your Head 2012, Constable.
5. Cunningham S.J., et al. Yours or mine? Ownership and memory. Conscious Cogn. 2008, 17:312-318.
6. Rogers T.B., et al. Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1977, 35:677-688.
7. Conway M.A. Memory and the self. J. Mem. Lang. 2005, 53:594-628.
8. Lou H.C., et al. Parietal cortex and representation of the mental self. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:6827-6832.
9. Johnson S.C., et al. Neural correlates of self-reflection. Brain 2002, 125:1808-1814.
10. Cabeza R., St.Jacques P. Functional neuroimaging of autobiographical memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11:219-227.
11. Turk D.J., et al. Mine and me: exploring the neural basis of object ownership. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:3657-3668.
12. Turk D.J., et al. When 'it' becomes 'mine': attentional biases triggered by object ownership. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:3725-3733.
13. Symons C., Johnson B.T. The self-reference effect in memory: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 1997, 121:371-394.
14. Leshikar E.D., et al. Self-referencing enhances recollection in both young and older adults. Neuropsychol. Dev. Cogn. B: Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 2015, 22:388-412.
15. Cunningham S.J., et al. The self-reference effect on memory in early childhood. Child Dev. 2014, 85:808-823.
16. Sui J., Zhu Y. Five-year-olds can show the self-reference advantage. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 2005, 29:382-387.
17. Gutchess A.H., et al. Aging, self-referencing, and medial prefrontal cortex. Soc. Neurosci. 2007, 2:117-133.
18. Gutchess A.H., et al. Functional neuroimaging of self-referential encoding with age. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:211-219.
19. Gutchess A.H., et al. Age differences in self-referencing: evidence for common and distinct encoding stragies. Brain Res. 2015, 1612:118-127.
20. Slessor G., et al. Exploring the specificity of age-related differences in theory of mind tasks. Psychol. Aging 2007, 22:639-643.
21. Slessor G., et al. Age-related declines in basic social perception: evidence from tasks assessing eye-gaze processing. Psychol. Aging 2008, 23:812-822.
22. Provyn J.P., et al. Effects of age on contextually mediated associations in paired associate learning. Psychol. Aging 2007, 22:846-857.
23. Dennis N.A., et al. Effects of aging on true and false memory formation: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:3157-3166.
24. Daselaar S.M., et al. Effects of healthy aging on hippocampal and rhinal memory functions: an event-related fMRI study. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 16:1771-1782.
25. Turner G.R., Spreng R.N. Executive functions and neurocognitive aging: dissociable patterns of brain activity. Neurobiol. Aging 2012, 826:e1-e13.
26. Verhaeghen P., Cerella J. Aging, executive control, and attention: a review of meta-analyses. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2002, 26:849-857.
27. Sui J., Humphreys G.W. Self-referential processing is distinct from semantic elaboration: evidence from long-term memory effects in a patient with amnesia and semantic impairments. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:2663-2673.
28. Humphreys, G.W. and Riddoch, M.J. (2003) From vision to action, and action to vision: a convergent route approach to vision, action and attention. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol. 42: Visual Cognition (Irwin, D. and B. Ross, B. eds), pp. 225-264, Academic Press.
29. Craik F.I.M., Lockhart R.S. Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 1972, 11:671-684.
30. Keyes H., Brady N. Self-face recognition is characterized by 'bilateral gain' and by faster, more accurate performance which persists with faces are inverted. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2010, 63:840-847.
31. Keyes H. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2012, 65:760-772.
32. Sui J., et al. Attentional orientation induced by temporarily established self-referential cues. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2009, 62:844-849.
33. Sui J., et al. Perceptual effects of social salience: evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2012, 38:1105-1117.
34. Sui J., et al. Super-capacity and violations of race independence for self- but not for reward-associated stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2015, 41:441-452.
35. Miller J. Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cogn. Psychol. 1982, 14:247-279.
36. Raab D.H. Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1962, 24:574-590.
37. Townsend J.T., Eidels A. Workload capacity spaces: a unified methodology for response time measures of efficiency as workload is varied. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2011, 18:659-681.
38. Yankouskaya A., et al. Interactions between facial emotion and identity in face processing: Evidence based on redundancy gains. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2012, 74:1692-1711.
39. Mordkoff J.T., Danek R.H. Dividing attention between color and shape revisited: redundant targets coactivate only when parts of the same perceptual object. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2011, 73:103-112.
40. Wang H., et al. Expanding and retracting from the self: gains and costs in switching self-associations. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2015, Published online September 7, 2015. 10.1037/xhp0000125.
41. Liu M., et al. Dynamically orienting your own face facilitates the automatic attraction of attention. Cogn. Neurosci. 2015, Published online May 15, 2015. 10.1080/17588928.2015.1044428.
42. Haider M., et al. Attention, vigilance, and cortical evoked potentials in humans. Science 1964, 145:180-182.
43. Luck S.J., et al. Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:432-440.
44. Sutton S., et al. Evoked-potentials correlates of stimuli uncertainty. Science 1965, 150:1187-1188.
45. Liu M., et al. Does self-related information interfere with task performances? A cross-cultural investigation. Cult. Brain 2015, 3:112-121.
46. Sui J., et al. Coupling social attention to the self forms a network for personal significance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:7607-7612.
47. Northoff G., Bermpohl F. Cortical midline structures and the self. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:102-107.
48. Araujo H.F., et al. Cortical midline structures and autobiographical-self processes: an activation-likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:548.
49. Murray R.J., et al. Degrees of separation: a quantitative neuroimaging meta-analysis investigating self-specificity and shared neural activation between self- and other-reflection. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2012, 36:1043-1059.
50. Northoff G. Self and brain: what is self-related processing?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15:186-187.
51. van der Meer L., et al. Self-reflection and the brain: a theoretical review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies with implications for schizophrenia. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010, 34:935-946.
52. Northoff G., et al. Self-referential processing in our brain - a meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self. Neuroimage 2006, 31:440-457.
53. Qin P., Northoff G. How is our self related to midline regions and the default-mode network?. Neuroimage 2011, 57:1221-1233.
54. Apps M.A.J., Tsakiris M. The free-energy self: a predictive coding account of self-recognition. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2013, 41:85-97.
55. Suddendorf T., Butler D.L. The nature of visual self-recognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2013, 17:121-127.
56. Suddendorf T., Butler D.L. Are rich interpretations of visual self-recognition a bit too rich?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2014, 18:58-59.
57. Platek S.M., et al. Neural correlates of self-face recognition: an effect-location meta-analysis. Brain Res. 2008, 1232:173-184.
58. Martinelli P., et al. Neural substrates of the self-memory system: new insights from a meta-analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013, 34:1515-1529.
59. Schmitz T.W., Johnson S.C. Relevance to self: a brief review and framework of neural systems underlying appraisal. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2007, 31:585-596.
60. Samson D., et al. Left temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else's belief. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:499-500.
61. Penny W.D., et al. Comparing families of dynamic causal models. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6:e1000709.
62. Murray R.J., et al. Functional connectivity mapping of regions associated with self and other-processing. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2015, 36:1304-1324.
63. Ries M.L., et al. Medial prefrontal functional connectivity - relation to memory self-appraisal accuracy in older adults with and without memory disorders. Neuropsychologia 2011, 50:603-611.
64. Pujol J., et al. Functional connectivity alterations in brain networks relevant to self-awareness in chronic cannabis users. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2014, 51:68-78.
65. Northoff G., Hayes D.J. Is our self nothing but reward?. Biol. Psychiatry. 2011, 69:1019-1025.
66. Ma Y., Han S. Why respond faster to the self than others? An implicit positive association theory of self advantage during implicit face recognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2010, 36:619-633.
67. Sui J., et al. The salient self: The left intra-parietal sulcus responds to social as well as perceptual-salience after self-association. Cereb. Cortex 2013, 25:1060-1068.
68. Moradi Z., et al. In-group modulation of perceptual matching. Psychonom. Bull. Rev. 2015, Published online January 13, 2015. 10.3758/s13423-014-0798-8.
69. Sui J., Humphreys G.W. The interaction between self-bias and reward: Evidence for common and distinct processes. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2015, 68:1952-1964.
70. Gillihan S.J., Farah M.J. Is self special? A critical review of evidence from experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Psychol. Bull. 2005, 131:76-97.
71. Legrand D., Ruby P. What is self-specific? Theoretical investigation and critical review of neuroimaging results. Psychol. Rev. 2009, 116:252-282.
72. Aron A., Aron E.N. Self and self expansion in relationships. Knowledge Structures in Close Relationships: A Social Psychological Approach 1996, 325-344. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. G.J.O. Fletcher, J. Fitness (Eds.).
73. Aron A., et al. Self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships and beyond. Blackwell's Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 2): Interpersonal Processes 2001, 478-502. Blackwell. J.O. Fletcher, M.S. Clark (Eds.).
74. Humphreys G.W., Sui J. The salient self: social saliency effects based on self bias. J. Cogn. Psychol. 2015, 27:129-140.
75. Yang J.L., et al. The excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate stimulates DNA repair to increase neuronal resiliency. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2011, 132:405-411.
76. Sui J., et al. Dynamic cultural modulation of neural responses to one's own and friend's faces. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2013, 8:326-332.
77. Bar M., et al. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:449-454.