Learning out loud: Increasing voluntary voice comments in online classes

Online Learning: Common Misconceptions, Benefits and Challenges

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 99-114

  Pacansky Brock, Michelle ^a  

^a Mt San Jacinto College   (United States)

Author keywords

Audio; Community; Social presence; Video; VoiceThread

Indexed keywords

EID: 84946127633     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Allen, E., & Seaman, A. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the U.S. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org /publications/survey/changing_course_2012.
2. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
3. Aragon, S. R. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuuing Education, (100), 57-68.
4. Besser, H., & Donahue, S. (1996). Introduction and overview: Perspectives on . distance independent education. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(11), 801-804.
5. Borup, J., West, R. E., & Graham, C. R. (2012). Improving online social presence through synchronous video. Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 195-203.
6. Brook, C., & Oliver, R. (2003). Online learning communitities: investigating a design framework. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(2), 139-160.
7. Brown, B. (2012, Mar). Brené Brown: Listening to shame. [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/brene_brown_listening_to_shame.html
8. Cleveland-Innes, M., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2012,). Women of social presence research. Featured session presented at the Sloan-C/MERLOT 5th Annual International Symposium for Emerging Technologies in Online Learning. Retrieved from http:// sloanconsortium.org/conference/2012/et4online/women-social-presence-research.
9. Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 4-36.
10. Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2013). Social media update. Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2013, Dec 30). Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Social- Media-Update.aspx
11. Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). Tweeting the night away: Using Twitter to enhance social presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 129-135.
12. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-205.
13. Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future direction. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172.
14. Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 11(3), 8-26.
15. Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26.
16. Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students' sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3-25.
17. IBM. (2010). Global CEO study: Creativity selected as most crucial factor for future success. Retrieved from http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/31670.wss
18. Jensen, C., Farnham, S. D., Drucker, S. M., & Kollock, P. (2000). The effect of communication modality on cooperation in online environments. Proceedings of CHI 2000 (pp. 470-477). The Hague, The Netherlands.
19. Jiang, M., & Ting, E. (2000). A study of factors influencing students' perceived learning in a web-based course environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6, 317-338.
20. Junco, R., Elavsky, C. M., & Heiberger, G. (2012). Putting Twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement, and success. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 273-287.
21. Kannalley, C. (2013, May 2). Those reports about Facebook losing a ton of users are bogus. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/02/facebooklosing- users_n_3201424.html.
22. Kaupp, R. (2012). Online Penalty: The impact of online instruction on the Latino-white achievement gap. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 12(2), 1-9.
23. Kehrwald, B. (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environment. Distance Education, 29(1), 89-106.
24. Kerka, S. (1996). Distance learning, the internet, and the world wide web. ERIC Digest. Retrieved from http://www.ericdigests.org/1997-1/distance.html
25. Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). Social presence. In P. Rogers, G. Berg, J. Boettcher, C. Howard, L. Justice, & K. Schenk (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance and online learning (2nd ed., pp. 1900-1906). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
26. Lowenthal, P. R. (2010). The evolution and influence of social presence theory on online learning. In S. Dasgupta (Ed.), Social computing: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 113-128). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
27. Madden, J., Lenhart, A., Cortesi, S., Gasser, U., Duggan, M. Smith, A., & Beaton, M. (2013). Teens, social media, and privacy. Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2013, May 21). Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Teens-Social-Media-And- Privacy.aspx
28. Nass, C., & Brave, S. (2005). Wired for sound: How voice activates and advances the humancomputer relationship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Oomen-Early, J. Bold, M. Wiginton, K. L., Gallien, T. L., & Anderson, N. (2008). Using asynchronous audio communicaiton (AAC) in the online classroom: A comparative study. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 267-276.
30. Pacansky-Brock, M. (2010). VoiceThread: Enhanced community, increased social presence and improved visual learning. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/ effective_practices/voicethread-enhanced-community-increased-social-presence-andimproved- visual-lea.
31. Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Picciano, A. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21- 40.
34. Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2001). An examination of social presence in online learning: Students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
35. Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88.
36. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 51-71.
37. Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1), 1-16.
38. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.
39. Smith, A. (2011). Americans and text messsaging. Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2011, September 9). Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Cell-Phone- Texting-2011/Main-Report/How-Americans-Use-Text-Messaging.aspx
40. Smith, A. (2013). Smartphone ownership. Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2013, Jun 5). Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Smartphone-Ownership-2013 /Findings.aspx
41. Stokes, P. J. (2006). Hidden in plain sight: Adult learners forge a new tradition in higher education. U.S. Department of Education, Commission on the Future of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture /reports.html
42. Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: The community of inquiry framework. In C. R. Payne (Ed.), Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks (pp. 43-57). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
43. Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication & Information, 2(1), 23-49.
44. Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., & Maher, G. (2000). Building knowledge building communities: Consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 389-413.
45. Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115-136.
46. Tu, C. H. (2000). On-line learning migration: From social learning theory to social presence theory in CMC environment. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23(1), 27- 37.
47. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.
48. Walther, J. B., Anderson, J. F., & Park, D. W. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computermediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Communication Research, 21(4), 460-487.
49. Weiner, J., & Mehrabian, A. (1968). Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
50. Zickuhr, K., & Smith, A. (2013). Home broadband 2013. (2013, Aug 26). Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Broadband.aspx