A simulation model of a three echelon supply chain system with multiple suppliers subject to supply and transportation disruptions

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 2036-2040

  Hishamuddiin, Hawa ^a   Sarker, Ruhul ^b   Essam, Daryl ^b  

^a UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Disruption; Multiple suppliers; Recovery; Simulation; Supply chain

Indexed keywords

INVENTORY CONTROL; RECOVERY; CHAINS;

DISRUPTION; MULTIPLE SUPPLIERS; PERFORMANCE MEASURE; SIMULATION; SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION; SUPPLY CHAIN SYSTEMS; THREE-STAGE SUPPLY CHAIN; TRANSPORTATION DISRUPTIONS; AND RECOVERY; MULTIPLE SUPPLIER; RECOVERY COSTS; SIMULATION MODEL; SUPPLY DISRUPTION; TOTAL RECOVERY;

SUPPLY CHAINS;

EID: 84946017665     PISSN: None     EISSN: 24058963     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.388     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Chen, J., Zhao, X., Zhou, Y., (2012). A periodic-review inventory system with a capacitated backup supplier for mitigating supply disruptions. European Journal of Operational Research. 219, 312-323.
2. Deleris, L.A., Erhun, F., (2005). Risk management in supply networks using monte-carlo simulation. In: Simulation Conference, 2005 Proceedings of the Winter, 4-7 Dec. 2005. 7 pp.
3. Hishamuddin, H., Sarker, R.A., Essam, D., (2013a). Optimal Inventory Policies for Multi-Echelon Supply Chain Systems with Disruption. PhD Thesis, UNSW Canberra.
4. Hishamuddin, H., Sarker, R.A., Essam, D., (2013b). A recovery model for a two-echelon serial supply chain with consideration of transportation disruption. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 64, 552-561.
5. Hishamuddin, H., Sarker, R. And Essam, D. (2014). A recovery mechanism for a two echelon supply chain system under supply disruption. Economic Modelling, Elsevier, 38, 555-563.
6. Keskin, B.B., Melouk, S.H., Meyer, I.L., (2010). A simulation-optimization approach for integrated sourcing and inventory decisions. Computers & Operations Research. 37, 1648-1661.
7. Li, X., Chen, Y., (2010). Impacts of supply disruptions and customer differentiation on a partial-backordering inventory system. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 18, 547-557.
8. Schmitt, A.J., Singh, M. (2009). Quantifying supply chain disruption risk using monte carlo and discrete-event simulation. In: M. D. Rossetti, R. R. H., B. Johansson, A. Dunkin, R. G. Ingalls, Eds., ed. Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference.
9. Schmitt, A.J., Snyder, L.V., Shen, Z.-J.M. (2010a). Centralization versus decentralization: Risk pooling, risk diversification, and supply uncertainty in a one-warehouse multiple-retailer system. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University, unpublished.
10. Schmitt, A.J., Snyder, L.V., Shen, Z.-J.M., (2010b). Inventory systems with stochastic demand and supply: Properties and approximations. European Journal of Operational Research. 206, 313-328.
11. Snyder, L.V., (2014). A tight approximation for a continuous-review inventory model with supplier disruptions. International Journal of Production Economics. 155, 91-108.
12. Snyder, L.V., Scaparra, M.P., Daskin, M.S., Church, R.L., (2006). Planning for disruptions in supply chain networks. Tutorials in Operations Research.
13. Snyder, L.V., Shen, Z.-J.M., (2006). Supply and demand uncertainty in multi-echelon supply chains. Bethlehem: Lehigh University, unpublished.
14. Tang, O., Nurmaya Musa, S., (2011). Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics. 133, 25-34.
15. Tomlin, B., (2006). On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Science. 52, 639-657.
16. Wilson, M.C., (2007). The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 43, 295-320.
17. Wu, T., Blackhurst, J., O'grady, P., (2007). Methodology for supply chain disruption analysis. International Journal of Production Research. 45, 1665-1682.