Inventory systems with stochastic demand and supply: Properties and approximations

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 206, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 313-328

  Schmitt, Amanda J ^a   Snyder, Lawrence V ^b   Shen, Zuo Jun Max ^c  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology ^*  (United States)

^b Lehigh University   (United States)

^c DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Inventory; Risk management; Supply chain management; Supply disruptions

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATE SOLUTION; BASE STOCK POLICY; CLOSED FORM; DISCRETE EVENTS; FRACTILES; INVENTORY; INVENTORY HOLDING; INVENTORY SYSTEMS; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; SHORTAGE COST; SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY; STOCHASTIC DEMAND; SUPPLY DISRUPTION;

COMPETITION; OPTIMIZATION; RISK MANAGEMENT; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; SUPPLY CHAINS;

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

EID: 77950368643     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.02.029     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Axsäter S. Inventory Control. first ed. (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA
2. Babich, V., 2008. Independence of capacity ordering and financial subsidies to risky suppliers. Working paper, Dept. of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
3. Babich V., Burnetas A.N., and Ritchken P.H. Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 9 2 (2007) 123-146
4. Berk E., and Arreola-Risa A. Note on "Future supply uncertainty in EOQ models". Naval Research Logistics 41 (1994) 129-132
5. Chopra S., and Meindl P. Supply Chain Management. second ed. (2004), Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
6. Chopra S., Reinhardt G., and Mohan U. The importance of decoupling recurrent and disruption risks in a supply chain. Naval Research Logistics 54 5 (2007) 544-555
7. Dada M., Petruzzi N., and Schwarz L. A newsvendor's procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 9 1 (2007) 9-32
8. Golany B., Kaplan E.H., Marmur A., and Rothblum U.G. Nature plays with dice - Terrorists do not: Allocating resources to counter strategic versus probabilistic risks. European Journal of Operational Research 192 (2009) 198-208
9. Güllü R., Önol E., and Erki̇p N. Analysis of a deterministic demand production/inventory system under nonstationary supply uncertainty. IIE Transactions 29 (1997) 703-709
10. Gupta D. The (Q, r) inventory system with an unreliable supplier. INFOR 34 2 (1996) 59-76
11. Parlar M. Continuous-review inventory problem with random supply interruptions. European Journal of Operational Research 99 (1997) 366-385
12. Parlar M., and Berkin D. Future supply uncertainty in EOQ models. Naval Research Logistics 38 (1991) 107-121
13. Parlar M., and Perry D. Analysis of a (q, r, t) inventory policy with deterministic and random yields when future supply is uncertain. European Journal of Operational Research 84 (1995) 431-443
14. Parlar M., and Perry D. Inventory models of future supply uncertainty with single and multiple suppliers. Naval Research Logistics 43 (1996) 191-210
15. Qi L., Shen Z.J.M., and Snyder L.V. A continuous-review inventory model with disruptions at both supplier and retailer. Production and Operations Management 18 5 (2009) 516-532
16. Scherer W.T., Pomroy T.A., and Fuller D.N. The triangular density to approximate the normal density: Decision rules-of-thumb. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 82 (2003) 331-341
17. Schmitt, A.J., Singh, M., 2009. A quantitative analysis of disruption risk in a multi-echelon supply chain. Working paper, MIT Center for Transportation and Logistics, Cambridge, MA, 2009.
18. Schmitt, A.J., Snyder. L.V., 2009. Infinite-horizon models for inventory control under yield uncertainty and disruptions. Working paper, P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 2009.
19. Silver E.A. Establishing the order quantity when the amount received is uncertain. INFOR 14 1 (1976) 32-39
20. Snyder, L.V., 2008. A tight approximation for a continuous-review inventory model with supplier disruptions. Working paper, P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
21. Snyder, L.V., Shen, Z.J.M., 2006. Supply and demand uncertainty in multi-echelon supply chains. Working paper, P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
22. Snyder, L.V., Tomlin, B., 2008. Inventory management with advanced warning of disruptions. Working paper, P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
23. Song J.-S., and Zipkin P.H. Inventory control with information about supply conditions. Management Science 42 10 (1996) 1409-1419
24. Tomlin B. On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Science 52 5 (2006) 639-657
25. Wagner S.M., Bode C., and Koziol P. Supplier default dependencies: Empirical evidence from the automotive industry. European Journal of Operational Research 199 1 (2009) 150-161
26. Yang Z., Aydin G., Babich V., and Bell D.R. Supply disruptions, asymmetric information and a backup production option. Management Science 55 2 (2009) 192-209
27. Yano C.A., and Lee H.L. Lot sizing with random yields: A review. Operations Research 43 2 (1995) 311-334
28. Zipkin P.H. Foundations of Inventory Management. first ed. (2000), McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston, MA