Automatic Prediction of Protein 3D Structures by Probabilistic Multi-template Homology Modeling

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2015, Pages

  Meier, Armin ^a,b   Söding, Johannes ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEURISTIC METHODS; OPEN SYSTEMS; PROBABILITY; PROTEINS;

3D STRUCTURE; AUTOMATIC PREDICTION; HOMOLOGY MODELING; MODELING QUALITY; MULTIPLE TEMPLATES; PROBABILISTICS; PROTEIN 3-D STRUCTURE; QUERY PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENTS; TEMPLATE MODELS;

OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; MULTI TEMPLATE HOMOLOGY MODELING; PROBABILITY; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SOFTWARE; STATISTICAL MODEL; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84946015803     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004343     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Mariani V, Kiefer F, Schmidt T, Haas J, Schwede T, (2011) Assessment of template based protein structure predictions in CASP9. Proteins 79 Suppl 1: 37–58. 22002823
2. Kinch L, Yong Shi S, Cong Q, Cheng H, Liao Y, et al. (2011) CASP9 assessment of free modeling target predictions. Proteins 79 Suppl 10: 59–73. doi: 10.1002/prot.23181 21997521
3. Huang Yea, (2013) Assessment of template-based protein structure predictions in CASP10. Proteins 2: 43–56.
4. Yan R, Xu D, Yang J, Walker S, Zhang Y, (2013) A comparative assessment and analysis of 20 representative sequence alignment methods for protein structure prediction. Scientific reports 3: 2619. doi: 10.1038/srep02619 24018415
5. Kryshtafovych Aea, (2014) CASP10 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments. Proteins 82: 164–174. doi: 10.1002/prot.24448
6. Söding J, Remmert M, (2011) Protein sequence comparison and fold recognition: progress and good-practice benchmarking. Current opinion in structural biology 21: 404–11. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.03.005 21458982
7. Wallner B, Elofsson A, (2005) All are not equal: A benchmark of different homology modeling programs. Protein Science 15: 1315–1327. doi: 10.1110/ps.041253405
8. Dalton JaR, Jackson RM, (2007) An evaluation of automated homology modelling methods at low target template sequence similarity. Bioinformatics 23: 1901–8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm262 17510171
9. Levitt M, (1996) Accurate modeling of protein conformation by automatic segment matching. J Mol Biol 226: 507–533. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90964-L
10. Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch M, (2003) Swiss-model: an automated protein homology-modeling server. Nuc Acid Res 31: 3381–85. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg520
11. Petrey D, Xiang Z, Tang CL, Xie L, Gimpelev M, et al. (2003) Using multiple structure alignments, fast model building, and energetic analysis in fold recognition and homology modeling. Proteins 53 Suppl 6: 430–435. doi: 10.1002/prot.10550 14579332
12. Sali A, Blundell T, (1993) Comparative Protein Modelling by Satisfaction of Spatial Restraints. J Mol Biol 234: 779–815. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626 8254673
13. Joo K, Lee J, Seo JH, Lee K, Kim BG, et al. (2009) All-atom chain-building by optimizing MODELLER energy function using conformational space annealing. Proteins 75: 1010–23. doi: 10.1002/prot.22312 19089941
14. Fiser A, Do RK, Sali A, (2000) Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein science: a publication of the Protein Society 9: 1753–73. doi: 10.1110/ps.9.9.1753
15. Remmert M, Biegert A, Hauser A, Söding J, (2012) HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment. Nature methods 9: 173–5. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1818
16. Bishop C, (1994) Mixture Density Networks. Technical report, Aston University.
17. Durbin R, Eddy S, Krogh A, Mitchison G, (1998) Biological sequence analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press.
18. Altschul S, Carroll R, DJ L, (1989) Weights for data related by a tree. J Mol Biol 207: 647–653. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90234-9 2760928
19. Sokal R, Michener C, (1958) A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 38: 1409–38.
20. Zhang Y, Skolnick J, (2005) TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic acids research 33: 2302–9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki524 15849316
21. Xu J, (2005) Fold recognition by predicted alignment accuracy. IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics / IEEE, ACM 2: 157–65. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2005.24 17044180
22. Hildebrand A, Remmert M, Biegert A, Söding J, (2009) Fast and accurate automatic structure prediction with HHpred. Proteins 77 Suppl 9: 128–32. doi: 10.1002/prot.22499 19626712
23. Peng J, Xu J, (2011) RaptorX: exploiting structure information for protein alignment by statistical inference. Proteins 79 Suppl 1: 161–71. doi: 10.1002/prot.23175 21987485
24. Cheng J, (2008) A multi-template combination algorithm for protein comparative modeling. BMC structural biology 8: 18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6807-8-18 18366648
25. Fernandez-Fuentes N, Rai BK, Madrid-Aliste CJ, Fajardo JE, Fiser A, (2007) Comparative protein structure modeling by combining multiple templates and optimizing sequence-to-structure alignments. Bioinformatics 23: 2558–65. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm377 17823132
26. Wang Z, Eickholt J, Cheng J, (2010) MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics 26: 882–8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq058 20150411
27. Zhang Y, (2008) I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC bioinformatics 9: 40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-40 18215316
28. Zhang Y, Skolnick J, (2004) SPICKER: A Clustering Approach to Identify Near-Native. J Comput Chem 25: 865–871. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20011 15011258
29. Read RJ, Chavali G, (2007) Assessment of CASP7 predictions in the high accuracy template-based modeling category. Proteins 69: 27–37. doi: 10.1002/prot.21662 17894351
30. Larsson P, Wallner B, Lindahl E, Elofsson A, (2008) Using multiple templates to improve quality of homology models in automated homology modeling. Protein Science: 990–1002. doi: 10.1110/ps.073344908 18441233
31. Casp9 abstract book: the embo conference (2010). URL http://predictioncenter.org/casp9/doc/Abstracts.pdf.
32. Casp10 abstract book: the embo conference (2012). URL http://predictioncenter.org/casp10/doc/CASP10_Abstracts.pdf.
33. Russel D, Lasker K, Webb B, Velazquez-Muriel J, Tjioe E, et al. (2012) Putting the pieces together: Integrative modeling platform software for strucutre determination of macromolecular assemblies. PLoS Biol 10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001244 22272186