Set-Based Concurrent Engineering for early phases in platform development

Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 564-576

  Levandowski, Christoffer ^a   Raudberget, Dag ^a   Johannesson, Hans ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Concept development; Product platforms; Set Based Concurrent Engineering; Systems engineering

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE INDUSTRY; BANDWIDTH; CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; FIGHTER AIRCRAFT; PRODUCT DESIGN; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT; DESIGN PROBLEMS; DESIGN SOLUTIONS; DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY; PLATFORM DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCT PLATFORMS; SET BASED CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; SET-DOWN; TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT; TRADE-OFF CURVES;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84946013818     PISSN: 2352751X     EISSN: 23527528     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-440-4-564     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Liker, J.K., Sobek, D.K., Ward, A.C. and Cristiano, J.J. Involving suppliers in product development in the United States and Japan: evidence for set-based concurrent engineering. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 1996, 43(2), 165-178.
2. Levandowski, C., Michaelis, M.T. and Johannesson, H. Set-Based Development Using an Integrated Product and Manufacturing System Platform. Concurrent Engineering - Research and Applications, 2014, (accepted)(
3. Robertson, D. and Ulrich, K. Planning for Product Platforms, 1998 Vol.39).
4. Meyer, M.H. and Lehnerd, A.P. The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership, 1997 (Free Press, New York, New York, USA).
5. Sobek, D.K., Ward, A.C. and Liker, J.K. Toyota's principles of set-based concurrent engineering. Sloan Manage Rev, 1999, 40(2), 67-83.
6. Pedersen, R.: Product Platform Modelling - Contributions to the discipline of visual product platform modelling. Department of Management Engineering. Technical University of Demark, Lyngby, Denmark (2009)
7. Shahin, T.M.M., Andrews, P.T.J. and Sivaloganathan, S. A Design Reuse System. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B - Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 1999, 213(6), 621-627.
8. Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. Product Design and Development, 2012 (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York).
9. Wortmann, H. and Alblas, A. Product platform life cycles: a multiple case study. International Journal of Technology Management, 2009, 48(2), 188-201.
10. Pedersen, R.: Product Platform Modelling - Contributions to the discipline of visual product platform modelling. DTU Management, Vol. Ph.D. Thesis. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark (2009)
11. Levandowski, C.E., Corin-Stig, D., Bergsjo, D., Forslund, A., Hogman, U., Soderberg, R. and Johannesson, H. An integrated approach to technology platform and product platform development. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 2013, 21(1), 65-83.
12. Inoue, M., Nahm, Y.E., Okawa, S. and Ishikawa, H. Design Support System by Combination of 3DCAD and CAE with Preference Set-based Design Method. The Journal of Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 2010, 18(1), 41-53.
13. Michaelis, M.T., Levandowski, C. and Johannesson, H.: Set-Based Concurrent Engineering for Preserving Design Bandwidth in Product and Manufacturing System Platforms. Proceedings of ASME IMECE, San Diego, California, USA (2013) Paper No. 63624
14. Levandowski, C., Forslund, A., Soderberg, R. and Johannesson, H.: Using PLM and Trade-Off Curves to Support Set-Based Convergence of Product Platforms. 19th International Conference on Engineering Design - ICED 2013, Seoul, Korea (2013)
15. Shahan, D. and Seepersad, C.C. Implications of Alternative Multilevel Design Methods for Design Process Management. Concurrent Engineering, 2010, 18(1), 5-18.
16. Berglund, F. and Claesson, A.: Utilising the Concept of a Design's Bandwidth to Achieve Product Platform Effectiveness. Proceedings of ICED 2005, Melbourne, Australia (2005) Paper No. 377.346
17. Wahl, A. and Johannesson, H.: Managing Design Change in Configurable Component Based Platforms. Proceedings of the 8th Biannual Conference NordDesign 2010, Vol. Vol. 2, Gothenburg, Sweden (2010) 413-423
18. Simpson, T.W. Product platform design and customization: Status and promise. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 2004, 18(1), 3-20.
19. Gonzalez-Zugasti, J.P. and Otto, K.N.: Modular platform-based product family design. Proceedings of ASME DETC. Citeseer, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (2000) Paper No. 14238
20. Du, G., Jiao, R.J. and Chen, M. Joint optimization of product family configuration and scaling design by Stackelberg game. Eur J Oper Res, 2014, 232(2), 330-341.
21. Fujita, K., Sakaguchi, H. and Akagi, S. Product variety deployment and its optimization under modular architecture and module commonalization, in Proceedings of Proceedings of the 1999 ASME design engineering technical conferences, 1999, pp. 12-15
22. Claesson, A.: A Configurable Component Framework Supporting Platform-Based Product Development. Department of Product and Production Development, Vol. Doctor of Engineering. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden (2006)
23. Michaelis, M.T., Johannesson, H. and ElMaraghy, H.A. Function and Process Modeling for the Co-Development of Products and Manufacturing Systems. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2014, in print)
24. Schachinger, P. and Johannesson, H. Computer Modelling of Design Specifications. Journal of Engineering Design, 2000, 11(4), 333-353.
25. Raudberget, D.: Enabling Set-Based Concurrent Engineering in Traditional Product Development. Proceedings of ICED 2011, Copenhagen, Denmark (2011) Paper No. 68.61-145
26. Chin, K.-S., Chan, A. and Yang, J.-B. Development of a fuzzy FMEA based product design system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2008, 36(7-8), 633-649.