Design support system by combination of 3D-CAD and CAE with preference set-based design method

Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 41-53

  Inoue, Masato ^a   Nahm, Yoon Eui ^b   Okawa, Soshi ^a   Ishikawa, Haruo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRO COMMUNICATIONS   (Japan)

^b Hanbat National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

3D CAD; CAE.; Early phase of design; Flexible and robust design; Preference; Set based design

Indexed keywords

3D-CAD; CAD MODELS; CAD SYSTEM; CAE ANALYSIS; CAE.; COMPUTER BASED SIMULATION; CONVENTIONAL OPTIMIZATION; CRITICAL EFFECTS; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; DESIGN METHOD; DESIGN PRODUCTS; DESIGN SOLUTIONS; DESIGN SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DESIGN WORK; ITERATIVE PROCESS; MULTI OBJECTIVE; MULTIPLE SOURCE; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS; ROBUST DESIGNS; SYSTEM-BASED;

CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;

EID: 77950494472     PISSN: 1063293X     EISSN: 15312003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1063293X09360833     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Motro, A. and P. Smets. (1997). Imperfect Information: Imprecision-Uncertainty, Uncertainty Management in Information Systems, From Needs to Solutions, pp. 225-254 Massachusetts, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Antonsson, E.K. and K.N. Otto. (1995). Imprecision in Engineering Design, Transaction of the ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 117 (B). 25-32.
3. Agarwal, H., Renaud, J.E., Preston, E.L. and Padmanabham, D. (2004). Uncertainty Quantification Using Evidence Theory in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 85 (1-3). 281-294.
4. Kara, S., Kayis, B. and Kaebernick, H. (1999). Modelling Concurrent Engineering Projects Under Uncertainty, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 7 (3). 269-274. (Pubitemid 30533984)
5. Chu, X.Z., Gao, L., Li, W.D., Qiu, H.B. and Shao, X.Y. (2009). An Uncertainty Analysis Approach to Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 17 (2). 121-128.
6. Wang, G.G. and Shan, S. (2007). Review of Metamodeling Techniques in Support of Engineering Design Optimization, Transaction of the ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 129 (4). 370-380. (Pubitemid 46736217)
7. Lu, S.C.Y., Bukkapatnam, S.T.S., Ge, P. and Wang, N. (1999). Backward Mapping Methodology for Design Synthesis, In: DETCĝ€™99: ASME 1999 Design Engineering Technical Conference, Las Vegas, NV.
8. Simpson, T.W., Peplinski, J., Koch, P.N. and Allen, J.K. (2001). Metamodels for Computer-based Engineering Design: Survey and Recommendations, Engineering with Computers, 17 (2). 129-150. (Pubitemid 32659225)
9. Chen, W., Allen, J.K. and Mistree, F. (1997). A Robust Concept Exploration Method for Enhancing Productivity in Concurrent System Design, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 5 (3). 203-217. (Pubitemid 127679914)
10. Sam-Haroud, D. and Faltings, B. (1996). Consistency Techniques for Continuous Constraints, Constraints, 1 (1-2). 85-118. (Pubitemid 126709716)
11. Devanathan, S. and Ramani, K. (2009). Creating Polytope Representation of Design Spaces for Visual Exploration Using Consistency Technique, In: DETCĝ€™09: ASME 2009 Design Engineering Technical Conference, San Diego, CA.
12. Yannou, B., Simpson, T.W. and Barton, R.R. (2003). Towards a Conceptual Design Explorer Using Metamodeling Approaches and Constraint Programming, In: DETCĝ€™03: ASME 2003 Design Engineering Technical Conference, Chicago, IL.
13. Parmee, I.C. and Abraham, J.A.R. (2004). Supprting Implict Leaning Via The Visualisation of COGA Multi-objective Data, In: Proceedings of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Portland, pp. 395-402.
14. Shan, S. and Wang, G.G. (2005). An Efficient Pareto Set Identification Approach for Multi-objective Optimization on Black-box Functions, Transaction of the ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 127 (5). 866-874. (Pubitemid 41250109)
15. Ward, A.C., Liker, J.K., Cristiano, J.J. and Sobek II, D.K. (1995). The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decision Can Make Better Cars Faster, Sloan Management Review, 32 (3). 43-61.
16. Sobek II, D.K., Ward, A.C. and Liker, J.K. (1999). Toyotaĝ€ ™s Principles of Set-based Concurrent Engineering, Sloan Management Review, 40 (2). 67-83.
17. Nahm, Y.-E. and Ishikawa, H. (2005). Representing and Aggregating Engineering Quantities for Set-based Concurrent Engineering, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 13 (2). 123-133.
18. Nahm, Y.-E. and Ishikawa, H. (2006). Novel Space-Based Design Methodology for Preliminary Engineering Design, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28: 1056-1070.
19. Nahm, Y.-E. and Ishikawa, H. (2006). A New 3D-CAD System for Set-Based Parametric Design, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 29: 137-150. (Pubitemid 43814083)
20. Nahm, Y.-E. and Ishikawa, H. (2007). A Flexible and Robust Approach for Preliminary Engineering Design Based on Designerĝ€™s Preference, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 15 (1). 53-62. (Pubitemid 46381273)
21. Finch, W.W. and Ward, A.C. (1996). Quantified Relations: A Class of Predicate Logic Design Constraint among Sets of Manufacturing, Operating and Other Variations, In: DETCĝ€™96: ASME 1996 Design Engineering Technical Conference, Irvine, CA.
22. Finch, W.W. and Ward, A.C. (1997). A Set-based System for Eliminating Infeasible Design in Engineering Dominated by Uncertainty, In: DETCĝ€™97: ASME 1997 Design Engineering Technical Conference, Sacramento, CA.
23. Scott, M.J. and Antonsson, E.K. (1998). Aggregation Functions for Engineering Design Tradeoffs, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 99 (3). 253-264.