Set-based development using an integrated product and manufacturing system platform

Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 234-252

  Levandowski, Christoffer ^a   Michaelis, Marcel T ^a   Johannesson, Hans ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

functional modeling; manufacturing platform; platform lifecycle; product platform; Set based concurrent engineering

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE INDUSTRY; BANDWIDTH; COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING; CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; LIFE CYCLE; SUPPLY CHAINS;

CUSTOMIZED PRODUCTS; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; FUNCTIONAL MODEL; MANUFACTURING PLATFORMS; PLATFORM DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCT PLATFORMS; REQUIRED FUNCTIONALITIES; SET-BASED CONCURRENT ENGINEERINGS;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84907381772     PISSN: 1063293X     EISSN: 15312003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1063293X14537654     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ahmad N, Wynn DC, Clarkson PJ. Change impact on a product and its redesign process: a tool for knowledge capture and reuse. Research in Engineering Design. 2013 ; 24 (3). 219-244
2. AlGeddawy T, ElMaraghy HA. A co-evolution model for prediction and synthesis of new products and manufacturing systems. Journal of Mechanical Design. 2012a ; 134 (5). 12
3. AlGeddawy T, ElMaraghy HA. Reactive design methodology for product family platforms, modularity and parts integration. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology. 2012b ; 6 (1). 34-43
4. Andreasen MM. Designing on a "designer's workbench" (DWB). Proceedings of the 9th WDK workshop ; 1992 Rigi ; 1992..
5. Berglund F, Claesson A. Utilising the concept of a design's bandwidth to achieve product platform effectiveness. Proceedings of ICED 2005 ; 2005 Melbourne, VIC, Australia ; 2005..
6. Bruun HPL, Mortensen NH, Harlou U. Interface diagram: design tool for supporting the development of modularity in complex product systems. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 2014 ; 22 (1). 62-76
7. ClaessonA (2006) A configurable component framework supporting platform-based product development. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Product and Production Development, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg.
8. Du G, Jiao RJ, Chen M. Joint optimization of product family configuration and scaling design by Stackelberg game. European Journal of Operational Research. 2014 ; 232 (2). 330-341
9. ErixonG (1998) Modular function deployment - a method for product modularisation. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Manufacturing Systems, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
10. Gedell S, Johannesson H. Design rationale and system description aspects in product platform design: focusing reuse in the design lifecycle phase. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 2013 ; 21 (1). 39-53
11. Gedell S, Michaelis MT, Johannesson H. Integrated model for co-development of products and production systems - a systems theory approach. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 2011 ; 19 (2). 139-156
12. Gonzalez-Zugasti JP, Otto KN. Modular platform-based product family design. Proceedings of ASME DETC ; 2000 Baltimore, MD ; 2000..
13. Henia R, Hamann A, Jersak M, et al. System level performance analysis - the SymTA/S approach. IEE P: Comput Dig T. 2005 ; 152 (2). 148-166
14. Hitchins DK Advanced Systems - Thinking, Engineering, and Management. Norwood, MA: Artech House ; 2003 :
15. Hubka V, Eder WE Theory of Technical Systems - A Total Concept Theory for Engineering Design. Berlin: Springer ; 1988 :
16. Inoue M, Nahm YE, Okawa S, et al. Design support system by combination of 3D-CAD and CAE with preference set-based design method. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 2010 ; 18 (1). 41-53
17. Jiao RJ, Simpson T, Siddique Z. Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 2007 ; 18 (1). 5-29
18. Johannesson H, Claesson A. Systematic product platform design: a combined function means and parametric modeling approach. Journal of Engineering Design. 2005 ; 16 (1). 25-43
19. Kennedy M, Harmon K, Minnock E Ready, Set, Dominate - Implement Toyota's Set-Based Learning for Developing Products and Nobody Can Catch You. Richmond, VA: Oaklea Press ; 2008 :
20. Levandowski CE, Corin-Stig D, Bergsjö D, et al. An integrated approach to technology platform and product platform development. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 2013a ; 21 (1). 65-83
21. Levandowski C, Forslund A, Söderberg R, et al. Using PLM and trade-off curves to support set-based convergence of product platforms. Proceedings of the 19th international conference on engineering design - ICED 2013 ; 2013b Seoul, South Korea ; 2013b..
22. Lindquist A, Berglund F, Johannesson H. Supplier integration and communication strategies in collaborative platform development. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 2008 ; 16 (1). 23-35
23. Malmqvist J. Improved function-means trees by inclusion of design history information. Journal of Engineering Design. 1997 ; 8 (2). 107-117
24. Meyer MH, Lehnerd AP The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership. New York: Free Press ; 1997 :
25. Michaelis MT, Johannesson H, ElMaraghy HA. Function and process modeling for the co-development of products and manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. in press ;:
26. Michaelis MT, Levandowski C, Johannesson H. Set-based concurrent engineering for preserving design bandwidth in product and manufacturing system platforms. Proceedings of ASME IMECE ; 2013 San Diego, CA ; 2013..
27. Mortensen NH, Anderasen MM, Harlou U. Conceptual modelling of product families in configuration projects. 11th Symposium Design for X, Schnaittach ; 2000 ; 2000..
28. Muffatto M. Introducing a platform strategy in product development. International Journal of Production Economics. 1999 ; 60: 145-153
29. Nahm Y-E, Ishikawa H. Integrated product and process modeling for collaborative design environment. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 2004 ; 12 (1). 5-23
30. PedersenR (2009) Product platform modelling - contributions to the discipline of visual product platform modelling. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Demark, Lyngby.
31. Prasad B Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals, Volume 1: Integrated Product and Process Organization. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall ; 1996 :
32. Raudberget D. Enabling set-based concurrent engineering in traditional product development. Proceedings of ICED 2011 ; 2011 Copenhagen ; 2011..
33. Schachinger P, Johannesson HL. Computer modelling of design specifications. Journal of Engineering Design. 2000 ; 11 (4). 317-329
34. Shahan D, Seepersad CC. Implications of alternative multilevel design methods for design process management. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 2010 ; 18 (1). 5-18
35. Siddique Z, Repphun B. Estimating cost savings when implementing a product platform approach. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 2001 ; 9 (4). 285-294
36. Sobek DK, Ward AC, Liker JK. Toyota's principles of set-based concurrent engineering. Sloan Management Review. 1999 ; 40 (2). 67-83
37. Suh NP The Principles of Design. New York: Oxford University Press ; 1990
38. Thiele L, Chakraborty S, Gries M, et al Embedded Software. Henzinger T Kirsch C, ed. Springer: Berlin ; 2001: 416-434.
39. Thiele L, Chakraborty S, Gries M, et al. A framework for evaluating design tradeoffs in packet processing architectures. Proceedings of the 39th design automation conference 2002 ; 2002 New Orleans, LA ; 2002..
40. Ulrich K. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy. 1995 ; 24 (3). 419-440
41. Wahl A, Johannesson H. Managing design change in configurable component based platforms. Proceedings of the 8th biannual conference NordDesign 2010 ; 2010 Gothenburg ; 2010..
42. Wortmann H, Alblas A. Product platform life cycles: a multiple case study. International Journal of Technology Management. 2009 ; 48 (2). 188-201