Evaluation of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy according to preoperative risk groups

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 57.e1-57.e7

  Suardi, Nazareno ^a   Dell׳Oglio, Paolo ^a,b   Gallina, Andrea ^a   Gandaglia, Giorgio ^a   Buffi, Nicolò ^c   Moschini, Marco ^a   Fossati, Nicola ^a   Lughezzani, Giovanni ^c   Karakiewicz, Pierre I ^b   Freschi, Massimo ^a   Lucianò, Roberta ^a   Shariat, Shahrokh F ^d   Guazzoni, Giorgio ^c   Gaboardi, Franco ^a   Montorsi, Francesco ^a   Briganti, Alberto ^a  

^a SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c HUMANITAS CLINICAL AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Italy)

^d MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Positive surgical margins; Prostate cancer; Robot assisted radical prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLEASON SCORE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INTERMEDIATE RISK PATIENT; LOW RISK PATIENT; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPEN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE VOLUME; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR INVASION; TUMOR VOLUME; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTOR; ROBOTICS;

HUMANS; MALE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTORS; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84945565044     PISSN: 10781439     EISSN: 18732496     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.08.019     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. [1] Boorjian, S.A., Karnes, R.J., Crispen, P.L., Carlson, R.E., Rangel, L.J., Bergstralh, E.J., et al. The impact of positive surgical margins on mortality following radical prostatectomy during the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol 183 (2010), 1003–1009.
2. [2] Mauermann, J., Fradet, V., Lacombe, L., Dujardin, T., Tiguert, R., Tetu, B., et al. The impact of solitary and multiple positive surgical margins on hard clinical end points in 1712 adjuvant treatment-naive pT2-4 N0 radical prostatectomy patients. Eur Urol 64 (2013), 19–25.
3. [3] Wright, J.L., Dalkin, B.L., True, L.D., Ellis, W.J., Stanford, J.L., Lange, P.H., et al. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy predict prostate cancer specific mortality. J Urol 183 (2010), 2213–2218.
4. [4] Pfitzenmaier, J., Pahernik, S., Tremmel, T., Haferkamp, A., Buse, S., Hohenfellner, M., Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?. BJU Int 102 (2008), 1413–1418.
5. [5] Karakiewicz, P.I., Eastham, J.A., Graefen, M., Cagiannos, I., Stricker, P.D., Klein, E., et al. Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients. Urology 66 (2005), 1245–1250.
6. [6] Suardi, N., Gallina, A., Lista, G., Gandaglia, G., Abdollah, F., Capitanio, U., et al. Impact of adjuvant radiation therapy on urinary continence recovery after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 65 (2014), 546–551.
7. [7] Montorsi, F., Gandaglia, G., Briganti, A., Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: where do we stand?. BJU Int, 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.12981.
8. [8] Gandaglia, G., Abdollah, F., Hu, J., Kim, S., Briganti, A., Sammon, J.D., et al. Is robot-assisted radical prostatectomy safe in men with high-risk prostate cancer? Assessment of perioperative outcomes, positive surgical margins, and use of additional cancer treatments. J Endourol 28 (2014), 784–791.
9. [9] Ficarra, V., Novara, G., Rosen, R.C., Artibani, W., Carroll, P.R., Costello, A., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62 (2012), 405–417.
10. [10] Ficarra, V., Novara, G., Ahlering, T.E., Costello, A., Eastham, J.A., Graefen, M., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62 (2012), 418–430.
11. [11] Ficarra, V., Novara, G., Fracalanza, S., D'Elia, C., Secco, S., Iafrate, M., et al. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int 104 (2009), 534–539.
12. [12] Laurila, T.A., Huang, W., Jarrard, D.F., Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients. Urol Oncol 27 (2009), 529–533.
13. [13] Barocas, D.A., Salem, S., Kordan, Y., Herrell, S.D., Chang, S.S., Clark, P.E., et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. J Urol 183 (2010), 990–996.
14. [14] Di Pierro, G.B., Baumeister, P., Stucki, P., Beatrice, J., Danuser, H., Mattei, A., A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur Urol 59 (2011), 1–6.
15. [15] Williams, S.B., Chen, M.H., D׳Amico, A.V., Weinberg, A.C., Kacker, R., Hirsch, M.S., et al. Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s). Urology 76 (2010), 1097–1101.
16. [16] Sooriakumaran, P., Srivastava, A., Shariat, S.F., Stricker, P.D., Ahlering, T., Eden, C.G., et al. A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients. Eur Urol 66 (2014), 450–456.
17. [17] Hu, J.C., Gandaglia, G., Karakiewicz, P.I., Nguyen, P.L., Trinh, Q.D., Shih, Y.C., et al. Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy cancer control. Eur Urol 66 (2014), 666–672.
18. [18] Heidenreich, A., Bellmunt, J., Bolla, M., Joniau, S., Mason, M., Matveev, V., et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 59 (2011), 61–71.
19. [19] Stamey, T.A., Villers, A.A., McNeal, J.E., Link, P.C., Freiha, F.S., Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: importance of the apical dissection. J Urol 143 (1990), 1166–1172 [discussion 72-3].
20. [20] Hong, Y.M., Hu, J.C., Paciorek, A.T., Knight, S.J., Carroll, P.R., Impact of radical prostatectomy positive surgical margins on fear of cancer recurrence: results from CaPSURE. Urol Oncol 28 (2010), 268–273.
21. [21] Novara, G., Ficarra, V., Mocellin, S., Ahlering, T.E., Carroll, P.R., Graefen, M., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62 (2012), 382–404.
22. [22] Tewari, A., Sooriakumaran, P., Bloch, D.A., Seshadri-Kreaden, U., Hebert, A.E., Wiklund, P., Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62 (2012), 1–15.
23. [23] Eastham, J.A., Kattan, M.W., Riedel, E., Begg, C.B., Wheeler, T.M., Gerigk, C., et al. Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 170 (2003), 2292–2295.
24. [24] Yossepowitch, O., Briganti, A., Eastham, J.A., Epstein, J., Graefen, M., Montironi, R., et al. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update. Eur Urol 65 (2014), 303–313.