Is robot-assisted radical prostatectomy safe in men with high-risk prostate cancer? assessment of perioperative outcomes, positive surgical margins, and use of additional cancer treatments

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 784-791

  Gandaglia, Giorgio ^a,b   Abdollah, Firas ^b   Hu, Jim ^c   Kim, Simon ^d   Briganti, Alberto ^b   Sammon, Jesse D ^e   Becker, Andreas ^a   Roghmann, Florian ^a   Graefen, Markus ^f   Montorsi, Francesco ^b   Perrotte, Paul ^g   Karakiewicz, Pierre I ^a,g   Trinh, Quoc Dien ^a,h   Sun, Maxine ^a  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^g UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^h BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER THERAPY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GENERALIZED ESTIMATING EQUATION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LUNG COMPLICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARAMETERS; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SAFETY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURGICAL MARGIN; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UROGENITAL TRACT DISEASE; VASCULAR DISEASE; WOUND COMPLICATION;

AGED; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84903719229     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0774     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1998;280: 969-74.
2. Punnen S, Cooperberg MR. The epidemiology of high-risk prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2013;23:331-336.
3. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2011;59: 572-583.
4. Thompson I, Thrasher JB, Aus G, et al. Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. J Urol 2007;177:2106-2131.
5. Bastian PJ, Boorjian SA, Bossi A, et al. High-risk prostate cancer: From definition to contemporary management. Eur Urol 2012;61:1096-1106.
6. Bastian PJ, Gonzalgo ML, Aronson WJ, et al. Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10. Cancer 2006;107:1265-1272.
7. Spahn M, Joniau S, Gontero P, et al. Outcome predictors of radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate-specific antigen greater than 20 ng/ml: A European multi-institutional study of 712 patients. Eur Urol 2010;58:1-7; discussion 10-11.
8. Ploussard G, Masson-Lecomte A, Beauval JB, et al. Radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer defined by preoperative criteria: Oncologic follow-up in national multicenter study in 813 patients and assessment of easy-to-use prognostic substratification. Urology 2011;78:607-613.
9. Ingels A, de la Taille A, Ploussard G. Radical prostatectomy as primary treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 2012;13:179-186.
10. Lowrance WT, Eastham JA, Savage C, et al. Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologists in the United States. J Urol 2012;187: 2087-2092.
11. Lee EK, Baack J, Duchene DA. Survey of practicing urologists: Robotic versus open radical prostatectomy. Can J Urol 2010;17:5094-5098.
12. Briganti A, Bianchi M, Sun M, et al. Impact of the introduction of a robotic training programme on prostate cancer stage migration at a single tertiary referral centre. BJU Int 2013;111:1222-1230.
13. Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2009;302:1557-1564.
14. Wong YN, Mitra N, Hudes G, et al. Survival associated with treatment vs observation of localized prostate cancer in elderly men. JAMA 2006; 296:2683-2693.
15. Klabunde CN, Potosky AL, Legler JM, Warren JL. Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:1258-1267.
16. D'Agostino RB, Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 1998;17:2265-2281.
17. Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart E. MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw 2011;42.
18. Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: Results from the nationwide inpa-tient sample. Eur Urol 2012;61:679-685.
19. Stephenson AJ, Kattan MW, Eastham JA, et al. Prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era. J Clin Oncol2009; 27:4300-4305.
20. Eggener SE, Scardino PT, Walsh PC, et al. Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2011;185:869-875.
21. Yuh B, Artibani W, Heidenreich A, et al. The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review. Eur Urol 2013 [epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.026.
22. Jung JH, Seo JW, Lim MS, et al. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection including internal iliac packet should be performed during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012;22:785-790.
23. Ham WS, Park SY, Rha KH, Kim WT, Choi YD. Robotic radical prostatectomy for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer is feasible: Results of a single-institution study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19:329-332.
24. Pierorazio PM, Mullins JK, Eifler JB, et al. Contemporaneous comparison of open vs minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int 2013;112:751-757.
25. Punnen S, Meng MV, Cooperberg MR, Greene KL, Cowan JE, Carroll PR. How does robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compare with open surgery in men with high-risk prostate cancer? BJU Int 2013;112:E314-E320.
26. Gandaglia G, Trinh QD, Hu JC, et al. The impact of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on the use and extent of pelvic lymph node dissection in the "post-dissemination" period. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014 [epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.12.016.
27. Feifer AH, Elkin EB, Lowrance WT, et al. Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2011; 117:3933-3942.
28. Nguyen PL, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al. Cost implications of the rapid adoption of newer technologies for treating prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1517-1524.
29. Trinh QD, Bjartell A, Freedland SJ, et al. A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2013;64:786-798.
30. Sammon JD, Karakiewicz PI, Sun M, et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: The differential effect of regionalization, procedure volume and operative approach. J Urol 2013;189:1289-1294.
31. Lawthers AG, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Peterson LE, Palmer RH, Iezzoni LI. Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid? Med Care 2000;38: 785-795.
32. Ploussard G, Briganti A, de la Taille A, et al. Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Efficacy, limitations, and complications-a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2014;65:7-16.