Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Where do we stand?

BJU International

Volumn 116, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 845-846

  Montorsi, Francesco ^a   Gandaglia, Giorgio ^a   Briganti, Alberto ^a  

^a SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; CANCER SPECIFIC MORTALITY FREE SURVIVAL; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; LEARNING CURVE; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; METASTASIS FREE SURVIVAL; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NOTE; OPEN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SAFETY; SURVIVAL; SURVIVAL RATE; TRANSFUSION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HUMANS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84946493064     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12981     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Gandaglia G, Sammon JD, Chang SL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in the postdissemination era. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 1419-1426
2. Diaz M, Peabody JO, Kapoor V, et al. Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2014 [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.025
3. Sukumar S, Rogers CG, Trinh QD, et al. Oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: long-term follow-up in 4803 patients. BJU Int 2014; 114: 824-831
4. Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 382-404
5. Briganti A, Bianchi M, Sun M, et al. Impact of the introduction of a robotic training programme on prostate cancer stage migration at a single tertiary referral centre. BJU Int 2013; 111: 1222-1230
6. Punnen S, Meng MV, Cooperberg MR, Greene KL, Cowan JE, Carroll PR,. How does robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compare with open surgery in men with high-risk prostate cancer? BJU Int 2013; 112: E314-320
7. Gandaglia G, Trinh QD, Hu JC, et al. The impact of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on the use and extent of pelvic lymph node dissection in the 'post-dissemination' period. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40: 1080-1086
8. Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 124-137
9. Abdollah F, Gandaglia G, Suardi N, et al. More extensive pelvic lymph node dissection improves survival in patients with node-positive prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2014 [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.011
10. Abboudi H, Khan MS, Guru KA, et al. Learning curves for urological procedures: a systematic review. BJU Int 2014; 114: 617-629