ProCon - PROteomics CONversion tool

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 129, Issue , 2015, Pages 56-62

  Mayer, Gerhard ^a   Stephan, Christian ^a,b   Meyer, Helmut E ^a,c   Kohl, Michael ^a   Marcus, Katrin ^a   Eisenacher, Martin ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b KAIROS GMBH   (Germany)

^c LEIBNIZ INSTITUT FÜR ANALYTISCHE WISSENSCHAFTEN ISAS E V   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conversion tool; MzIdentML; PRIDE; ProCon; ProteomeXchange; Proteomics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DATA REPOSITORY; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA BASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; SCIENTIST; SEARCH ENGINE; ALGORITHM; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED VOCABULARY; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

PROTEOME;

ALGORITHMS; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE DESIGN; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 84945497412     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.06.015     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Deutsch E.W. File formats commonly used in mass spectrometry proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11:1612-1621.
2. Gonzalez-Galarza F.F., Qi D., Fan J., Bessant C., Jones A.R. A tutorial for software development in quantitative proteomics using PSI standard formats. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1844, 2014:88-97.
3. Perez-Riverol Y., Alpi E., Wang R., Hermjakob H., Vizcaíno J.A. Making proteomics data accessible and reusable: current state of proteomics databases and repositories. Proteomics 2015, 15:930-950.
4. Riffle M., Eng J.K. Proteomics data repositories. Proteomics 2009, 9:4653-4663.
5. Vizcaíno J.A., Coté R., Reisinger F., Barsnes H., Foster J.M., Rameseder J., et al. The Proteomics Identifications database: 2010 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:D736-D742.
6. Deutsch E.W., Lam H., Aebersold R. PeptideAtlas: a resource for target selection for emerging targeted proteomics workflows. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9:429-434.
7. Perez-Riverol Y., Hermjakob H., Kohlbacher O., Martens L., Creasy D., Cox J., et al. Computational proteomics pitfalls and challenges: HavanaBioinfo 2012 workshop report. J. Proteomics 2013, 87:134-138.
8. Orchard S. Data standardization and sharing-the work of the HUPO-PSI. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1844(1 Pt A):82-87.
9. Deutsch E.W., Albar J.P., Binz P.A., Eisenacher M., Jones A.R., Mayer G., et al. Development of data representation standards by the human proteome organization proteomics standards initiative. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2015, 22:495-506.
10. Mayer G., Jones A.R., Binz P.A., Deutsch E.W., Orchard S., Montecchi-Palazzi L., et al. Controlled vocabularies and ontologies in proteomics: overview, principles and practice. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1844:97-107. [Part A].
11. Mayer G., Montecchi-Palazzi L., Ovelleiro D., Jones A.R., Binz P.A., Deutsch E.W., et al. The HUPO proteomics standards initiative-mass spectrometry controlled vocabulary. Database (Oxford) 2013, 2013:1-13. (2013:bat009).
12. Ghali F., Krishna R., Lukasse P., Martinez-Bartolome S., Reisinger F., Hermjakob H., et al. Tools (Viewer, Library and Validator) that facilitate use of the peptide and protein identification standard format, termed mzIdentML. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2013, 12:3026-3035.
13. Jones A.R., Eisenacher M., Mayer G., Kohlbacher O., Siepen J., Hubbard S.J., et al. The mzIdentML data standard for mass spectrometry-based proteomics results. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11. (M111 014381).
14. Walzer M., Qi D., Mayer G., Uszkoreit J., Eisenacher M., Sachsenberg T., et al. The mzQuantML data standard for mass spectrometry-based quantitative studies in proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2014, 13.10:2765-2775.
15. Martens L., Chambers M., Sturm M., Kessner D., Levander F., Shofstahl J., et al. mzML-a community standard for mass spectrometry data. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10. (R110 000133).
16. Deutsch E.W., Chambers M., Neumann S., Levander F., Binz P.A., Shofstahl J., et al. TraML-a standard format for exchange of selected reaction monitoring transition lists. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11(R111):015040.
17. Coté R.G., Griss J., Dianes J.A., Wang R., Wright J.C., van den Toorn H.W., et al. The PRoteomics IDEntification (PRIDE) Converter 2 framework: an improved suite of tools to facilitate data submission to the PRIDE database and the ProteomeXchange consortium. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11:1682-1689.
18. Coté R.G., Reisinger F., Martens L. jmzML, an open-source Java API for mzML, the PSI standard for MS data. Proteomics 2010, 10:1332-1335.
19. Helsens K., Brusniak M.Y., Deutsch E., Moritz R.L., Martens L. jTraML: an open source Java API for TraML, the PSI standard for sharing SRM transitions. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10:5260-5263.
20. Reisinger F., Krishna R., Ghali F., Ríos D., Hermjakob H., Vizcaíno J.A., et al. jmzIdentML API: a Java interface to the mzIdentML standard for peptide and protein identification data. Proteomics 2012, 12:790-794.
21. Qi D., Krishna R., Jones A.R. The jmzQuantML programming interface and validator for the mzQuantML data standard. Proteomics 2014, 14:685-688.
22. Griss J., Reisinger F., Hermjakob H., Vizcaíno J.A. jmzReader: a Java parser library to process and visualize multiple text and XML-based mass spectrometry data formats. Proteomics 2012, 12:795-798.
23. Barsnes H., Vaudel M., Colaert N., Helsens K., Sickmann A., Berven F.S., et al. compomics-utilities: an open-source Java library for computational proteomics. BMC Bioinforma. 2011, 12:70.
24. Bald T., Barth J., Niehues A., Specht M., Hippler M., Fufezan C. pymzML-Python module for high-throughput bioinformatics on mass spectrometry data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:1052-1053.
25. Kessner D., Chambers M., Burke R., Agus D., Mallick P. ProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:2534-2536.
26. Vizcaíno J.A., Deutsch E.W., Wang R., Csordas A., Reisinger F., Ríos D., et al. ProteomeXchange provides globally coordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32:223-226.
27. Perez-Riverol Y., Wang R., Hermjakob H., Muller M., Vesada V., Vizcaíno J.A. Open source libraries and frameworks for mass spectrometry based proteomics: a developer's perspective. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1844, 2014:63-76.
28. Vaudel M., Burkhart J.M., Zahedi R.P., Oveland E., Berven F.S., Sickmann A., et al. PeptideShaker enables reanalysis of MS-derived proteomics data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33:22-24.
29. Wang R., Fabregat A., Ríos D., Ovelleiro D., Foster J.M., Coté R.G., et al. PRIDE Inspector: a tool to visualize and validate MS proteomics data. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30:135-137.
30. Eisenacher M., Martens L., Hardt T., Kohl M., Barsnes H., Helsens K., et al. Getting a grip on proteomics data - Proteomics Data Collection (ProDaC). Proteomics 2009, 9:3928-3933.
31. Warr W.A. Scientific workflow systems: Pipeline Pilot and KNIME. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2012, 26:801-804.
32. Eng J.K., Mccormack A.L., Yates J.R. An approach to correlate tandem mass-spectral data of peptides with amino-acid-sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 5:976-989.
33. Eng J.K., Jahan T.A., Hoopmann M.R. Comet: an open-source MS/MS sequence database search tool. Proteomics 2013, 13:22-24.
34. Bailey C.M., Sweet S.M., Cunningham D.L., Zeller M., Heath J.K., Cooper H.J. SLoMo: automated site localization of modifications from ETD/ECD mass spectra. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8:1965-1971.
35. Smith B., Ashburner M., Rosse C., Bard J., Bug W., Ceusters W., et al. The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25:1251-1255.
36. Thiele H., Glandorf J., Hufnagel P., Korting G., Bluggel M. Managing proteomics data: from generation and data warehousing to central data repository. J. Proteomics Bioinform. 2008, 01:485-507.
37. Thiele H., Glandorf J., Hufnagel P. Bioinformatics strategies in life sciences: from data processing and data warehousing to biological knowledge extraction. J. Integr. Bioinform. 2010, 7:141.
38. Perkins D.N., Pappin D.J.C., Creasy D.M., Cottrell J.S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20:3551-3567.
39. Colinge J., Masselot A., Cusin I., Mahe E., Niknejad A., Argoud-Puy G., et al. High-performance peptide identification by tandem mass spectrometry allows reliable automatic data processing in proteomics. Proteomics 2004, 4:1977-1984.
40. Eng J.K., Fischer B., Grossmann J., Maccoss M.J. A fast SEQUEST cross correlation algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7:4598-4602.
41. Chamrad D.C., Korting G., Stuhler K., Meyer H.E., Klose J., Bluggel M. Evaluation of algorithms for protein identification from sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 2004, 4:619-628.
42. Zhang W.Z., Chait B.T. Profound: an expert system for protein identification using mass spectrometric peptide mapping information. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72:2482-2489.
43. Clauser K.R., Baker P., Burlingame A.L. Role of accurate mass measurement (+/-10ppm) in protein identification strategies employing MS or MS/MS and database searching. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71:2871-2882.
44. Field H.I., Fenyo D., Beavis R.C. RADARS, a bioinformatics solution that automates proteome mass spectral analysis, optimises protein identification, and archives data in a relational database. Proteomics 2002, 2:36-47.
45. Phan I.Q., Pilbout S.F., Fleischmann W., Bairoch A. NEWT, a new taxonomy portal. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31:3822-3823.
46. Henriksson G., Englund A.K., Johansson G., Lundahl P. Calculation of the isoelectric points of native proteins with spreading of pKa values. Electrophoresis 1995, 16:1377-1380.
47. Colaert N., Barsnes H., Vaudel M., Helsens K., Timmerman E., Sickmann A., et al. Thermo-msf-parser: an open source Java library to parse and visualize Thermo Proteome Discoverer msf files. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10:3840-3843.
48. Elias J.E., Gygi S.P. Target-decoy search strategy for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 604:55-71.
49. Reidegeld K.A., Eisenacher M., Kohl M., Chamrad D., Korting G., Bluggel M., et al. An easy-to-use Decoy Database Builder software tool, implementing different decoy strategies for false discovery rate calculation in automated MS/MS protein identifications. Proteomics 2008, 8:1129-1137.
50. Aiyetan P., Zhang B., Chen L., Zhang Z., Zhang H. M2Lite: an Open-source, Light-weight, Pluggable and Fast Proteome Discoverer MSF to mzIdentML Tool. J. Bioinforma. 2014, 1:40-49.
51. Pruitt K.D., Brown G.R., Hiatt S.M., Thibaud-Nissen F., Astashyn A., Ermolaeva O., et al. RefSeq: an update on mammalian reference sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42:D756-D763.
52. Griss J., Jones A.R., Sachsenberg T., Walzer M., Gatto L., Hartler J., et al. The mzTab data exchange format: communicating mass-spectrometry-based proteomics and metabolomics experimental results to a wider audience. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2014, 13:2765-2775.
53. Lundgren D.H., Hwang S.I., Wu L., Han D.K. Role of spectral counting in quantitative proteomics. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2010, 7:39-53.
54. Zhu W., Smith J.W., Huang C.M. Mass spectrometry-based label-free quantitative proteomics. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2010, 2010:840518.
55. Bradshaw R.A., Burlingame A.L., Carr S., Aebersold R. Reporting protein identification data: the next generation of guidelines. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5:787-788.
56. Rodriguez H., Snyder M., Uhlen M., Andrews P., Beavis R., Borchers C., et al. Recommendations from the 2008 International Summit on Proteomics Data Release and Sharing Policy: the Amsterdam principles. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8:3689-3692.
57. Sabido E., Selevsek N., Aebersold R. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics for systems biology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23:591-597.
58. Yang Y., Adelstein S.J., Kassis A.I. Target discovery from data mining approaches. Drug Discov. Today 2012, 17:S16-S23. (Suppl.).