Flipping Out! A Case Study on How to Flip the Principles of Economics Classroom

International Advances in Economic Research

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 379-390

  Vazquez, Jose J ^a   Chiang, Eric P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Active learning; Cognitive science; Economic education; Flipped classroom; Visuals

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945495481     PISSN: 10830898     EISSN: 1573966X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11294-015-9549-5     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bosshardt, W.D, & Chiang, E.P. (2015). Lecture capture learning: do students perform better compared to face-to-face classes? Southern Economic Journal, forthcoming.
2. Chen, Z., Stelzer, T., & Gladding, G. (2010). Using multimedia modules to better prepare students for introductory physics lecture. Physics Education Research, 6, 010108.
3. Endestad, T., Magnussen, S., & Helstrup, T. (2003). Memory for pictures and words following literal and metaphorical decisions. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 23(2–3), 209–216.
4. Figlio, D., Rush, M., & Yin, L. (2013). Is it live or is it Internet? Experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(4), 763–84.
5. Goffe, W., & Kauper, D. (2014). A survey of principles instructors: Why lecture prevails. The Journal of Economic Education, 45(4), 360–375.
6. Joyce, T. J., Crockett, S., Jaeger, D. A., Altindag, O., & O’Connell, S. D. (2015). Does classroom time matter? Economics of Education Review, 46, 64–77.
7. Marrs, K., & Novak, G. (2004). Just-in-time teaching in biology: creating an active learner classroom using the internet. Cell Biology Education, 3, 49–61.
8. McBride, D., & Dosher, B. (2002). A comparison of conscious and automatic memory processes for picture and word stimuli: a process dissociation analysis. Consciousness and Cognition, 11(3), 423–460.
9. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Paivio, A. (2006). Mind and Its Evolution: A Dual Coding Theoretical Approach. New York: Psychology Press.
11. Pelli, D., Farell, B., & Moore, D. (2003). The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition. Nature, 423, 752–756.
12. Standing, L., Conezio, J., & Haber, R. (1970). Perception and memory for pictures: single-trial learning of 2,500 visual stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 19, 73–74.
13. Stelzer, T., Gladding, G., Mestre, J., & Brookes, D. (2009). Comparing the efficacy of multimedia modules with traditional textbooks for learning introductory physics content. American Journal of Physics, 77, 184.
14. Stenberg, G. (2006). Conceptual and perceptual factors in the picture superiority effect. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18(6), 813–847.
15. Vazquez, J., & Chiang, E.P. (2015). Preparing students for class: A clinical trial testing the efficacy between multimedia pre-lectures and textbooks. Working paper.