Minimal sample requirement for highly multiplexed protein quantification in cell lines and tissues by PCT-SWATH mass spectrometry

Proteomics

Volumn 15, Issue 21, 2015, Pages 3711-3721

  Shao, Shiying ^a,b   Guo, Tiannan ^b   Koh, Chiek Ching ^b   Gillessen, Silke ^c   Joerger, Markus ^c   Jochum, Wolfram ^c   Aebersold, Ruedi ^b,d  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c CANTONAL HOSPITAL ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biomedicine; Mass spectrometry; Pressure cycling technology; SWATH

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE; PROTEIN; PROTEOME;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN TISSUE; CELL LINE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEART; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY PARENCHYMA; LIVER; LYSIS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRESSURE CYCLING TECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SEQUENTIAL WINDOW ACQUISITION OF ALL THEORETICAL FRAGMENT MASS SPECTROMETRY; TECHNOLOGY; ANIMAL; ECONOMICS; MOUSE; PROCEDURES; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SAMPLE SIZE;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE; HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MICE; PEPTIDES; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 84945440951     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201500161     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Guo, T., Kouvonen, P., Koh, C. C., Gillet, L. C. et al., Rapid mass spectrometric conversion of tissue biopsy samples into permanent quantitative digital proteome maps. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 407-413.
2. Lopez-Ferrer, D., Petritis, K., Hixson, K. K., Heibeck, T. H. et al., Application of pressurized solvents for ultrafast trypsin hydrolysis in proteomics: proteomics on the fly. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 3276-3281.
3. Freeman, E., Ivanov, A. R., Proteomics under pressure: development of essential sample preparation techniques in proteomics using ultrahigh hydrostatic pressure. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 5536-5546.
4. Olszowy, P. P., Burns, A., Ciborowski, P. S., Pressure-assisted sample preparation for proteomic analysis. Anal. Biochem. 2013, 438, 67-72.
5. Powell, B. S., Lazarev, A. V., Carlson, G., Ivanov, A. R. et al., Pressure cycling technology in systems biology. Methods. Mol. Biol. 2012, 881, 27-62.
6. Lopez-Ferrer, D., Petritis, K., Robinson, E. W., Hixson, K. K. et al., Pressurized pepsin digestion in proteomics: an automatable alternative to trypsin for integrated top-down bottom-up proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10, M110 001479.
7. Gillet, L. C., Navarro, P., Tate, S., Rost, H. et al., Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11, O111 016717.
8. Rost, H. L., Rosenberger, G., Navarro, P., Gillet, L. et al., OpenSWATH enables automated, targeted analysis of data-independent acquisition MS data. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 219-223.
9. Smejkal, G. B., Robinson, M. H., Lawrence, N. P., Tao, F. et al., Increased protein yields from Escherichia coli using pressure-cycling technology. J. Biomol. Tech. 2006, 17, 173-175.
10. Capelo, J. L., Carreira, R., Diniz, M., Fernandes, L. et al., Overview on modern approaches to speed up protein identification workflows relying on enzymatic cleavage and mass spectrometry-based techniques. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2009, 650, 151-159.
11. Nagrath, S., Sequist, L. V., Maheswaran, S., Bell, D. W. et al., Isolation of rare circulating tumour cells in cancer patients by microchip technology. Nature 2007, 450, 1235-1239.
12. Plouffe, B. D., Kniazeva, T., Mayer, J. E., Jr. et al., Development of microfluidics as endothelial progenitor cell capture technology for cardiovascular tissue engineering and diagnostic medicine. FASEB J. 2009, 23, 3309-3314.
13. Basso, G., Veltroni, M., Valsecchi, M. G., Dworzak, M. N. et al., Risk of relapse of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia is predicted by flow cytometric measurement of residual disease on day 15 bone marrow. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 5168-5174.
14. Kotecha, N., Flores, N. J., Irish, J. M., Simonds, E. F. et al., Single-cell profiling identifies aberrant STAT5 activation in myeloid malignancies with specific clinical and biologic correlates. Cancer Cell 2008, 14, 335-343.
15. Shao, S., Guo, T., Aebersold, R., Mass spectrometry-based proteomic quest for diabetes biomarkers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014, 1854, 519-527.
16. Sajic, T., Liu, Y., Aebersold, R., Using data-independent, high resolution mass spectrometry in protein biomarker research: Perspectives and clinical applications. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2014, 9, 307-321.
17. Hughes, C. S., Foehr, S., Garfield, D. A., Furlong, E. E. et al., Ultrasensitive proteome analysis using paramagnetic bead technology. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2014, 10, 757.
18. Kulak, N. A., Pichler, G., Paron, I., Nagaraj, N. et al., Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells. Nat. Methods 2014, 11, 319-324.
19. Liu, Y., Chen, J., Sethi, A., Li, Q. K. et al., Glycoproteomic analysis of prostate cancer tissues by SWATH mass spectrometry discovers N-acylethanolamine acid amidase and protein tyrosine kinase 7 as signatures for tumor aggressiveness. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2014, 13, 1753-1768.
20. Schubert, O. T., Gillet, L. C., Collins, B. C., Navarro, P. et al., Building high-quality assay libraries for targeted analysis of SWATH MS data. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 426-441.
21. Deutsch, E. W., Mendoza, L., Shteynberg, D., Farrah, T. et al., A guided tour of the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1150-1159.
22. Bolstad, B. M., Irizarry, R. A., Astrand, M., Speed, T. P., A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 185-193.
23. Shi, Y., Ryu, D. D., Ballica, R., Rheological properties of mammalian cell culture suspensions: hybridoma and HeLa cell lines. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1993, 41, 745-754.
24. Dumont, F., Marechal, P. A., Gervais, P., Cell size and water permeability as determining factors for cell viability after freezing at different cooling rates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 268-272.
25. Hoa, N., Ge, L., Kuznetsov, Y., McPherson, A. et al., Glioma cells display complex cell surface topographies that resist the actions of cytolytic effector lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 4793-4803.
26. Wang, N., Xu, M., Wang, P., Li, L., Development of mass spectrometry-based shotgun method for proteome analysis of 500 to 5000 cancer cells. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 2262-2271.
27. Tian, R., Wang, S., Elisma, F., Li, L. et al., Rare cell proteomic reactor applied to stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)-based quantitative proteomics study of human embryonic stem cell differentiation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10, M110 000679.
28. Maurer, M., Muller, A. C., Wagner, C., Huber, M. L. et al., Combining filter-aided sample preparation and pseudoshotgun technology to profile the proteome of a low number of early passage human melanoma cells. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 1040-1048.
29. Li, S., Plouffe, B. D., Belov, A. M., Ray, S. et al. An integrated platform for isolation, processing, and mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling of rare cells in whole blood. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2015, 14, 1672-1683.
30. Yao, Y., Liu, R., Shin, M. S., Trentalange, M. et al., CyTOF supports efficient detection of immune cell subsets from small samples. J. Immunol. Methods 2014, 415, 1-5.
31. Bruggner, R. V., Bodenmiller, B., Dill, D. L., Tibshirani, R. J. et al., Automated identification of stratifying signatures in cellular subpopulations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E2770-E2777.