Diagnostic accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for detecting major depression in pregnant and postnatal women: Protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 10, 2015, Pages

  Thombs, Brett D ^a,b   Benedetti, Andrea ^a,c   Kloda, Lorie A ^a   Levis, Brooke ^a,b   Riehm, Kira E ^b   Azar, Marleine ^a,b   Cuijpers, Pim ^d   Gilbody, Simon ^e   Ioannidis, John P A ^f   McMillan, Dean ^e   Patten, Scott B ^g   Shrier, Ian ^a,b   Steele, Russell J ^a,b   Ziegelstein, Roy C ^h   Tonelli, Marcello ⁱ   Mitchell, Nicholas ^j   Comeau, Liane ^k   Schinazi, Joy ^l   Vigod, Simone ^m  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^d VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

^f Stanford Medicine Children s Health   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^h JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^j UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^k INSTITUT NATIONAL DE SANTÉ PUBLIQUE DU QUÉBEC   (Canada)

^l Public Health Department of Laval   (Canada)

^m UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EDINBURGH POSTNATAL DEPRESSION SCALE; HUMAN; MAJOR DEPRESSION; META ANALYSIS; PATIENT SELECTION; PERINATAL PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREGNANT WOMAN; PUERPERIUM; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; DEPRESSION, POSTPARTUM; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, MAJOR; FEMALE; LITERATURE; MASS SCREENING; MENTAL HEALTH; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); METHODOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; SELF REPORT; STANDARDS;

DEPRESSION, POSTPARTUM; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, MAJOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MENTAL HEALTH; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; SELF REPORT;

EID: 84945353839     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009742     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Kessler RC. Epidemiology of women and depression. J Affect Disord 2003; 74: 5-13.
2. Gaynes BN, Gavin N, Meltzer-Brody S, et al. Perinatal Depression: Prevalence, Screening Accuracy, and Screening Outcomes. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 119. (Prepared by the RTI-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center, under Contract No. 290-02-0016.) AHRQ Publication No. 05-E006-2. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. February 2005.
3. O'Hara MW, Swain AM. Rates and risk of postpartum depression-a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatr 1996; 8: 37-54.
4. Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, et al. Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 1071-83.
5. Bennett HA, Einarson A, Taddio A, et al. Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 698-709.
6. Cooper PJ, Campbell EA, Day A, et al. Non-psychotic psychiatric disorder after childbirth. A prospective study of prevalence, incidence, course and nature. Br J Psychiatry 1988; 152: 799-806.
7. O'Hara MW, Zekoski EM, Philipps LH, et al. Controlled prospective study of postpartum mood disorders: comparison of childbearing and nonchildbearing women. J Abnorm Psychol 1990; 99: 3-15.
8. Cox JL, Murray D, Chapman G. A controlled study of the onset, duration and prevalence of postnatal depression. Br J Psychiatry 1993; 163: 27-31.
9. Stewart DE. Clinical practice. Depression during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1605-11.
10. Vesga-Lopez O, Blanco C, Keyes K, et al. Psychiatric disorders in pregnant and postpartum women in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65: 805-15.
11. Zelkowitz P, Milet TH. The course of postpartum psychiatric disorders in women and their partners. J Nerv Ment Dis 2001; 189: 575-82.
12. Zelkowitz P, Milet TH. Postpartum psychiatric disorders: their relationship to psychological adjustment and marital satisfaction in the spouses. J Abnorm Psychol 1996; 105: 281-5.
13. Whitley R, Kirmayer LJ. Perceived stigmatisation of young mothers: an exploratory study of psychological and social experience. Soc Sci Med 2008; 66: 339-48.
14. Howard LM, Molyneaux E, Dennis C, et al. Non-psychotic mental disorders in the perinatal period. Lancet 2014; 384: 1775-88.
15. Duhoux A, Fournier L, Gauvin L, et al. What is the association between quality of treatment for depression and patient outcomes? A cohort study of adults consulting in primary care. J Affect Disord 2013; 151: 265-74.
16. Duhoux A, Fournier L, Nguyen CT, et al. Guideline concordance of treatment for depressive disorders in Canada. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2009; 44: 385-92.
17. Mental Health Commission of Canada. Changing directions, changing lives: the mental health strategy for Canada. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Mental Health Commission of Canada, 2012. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee opinion no. 453: Screening for depression during and after pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 394-5.
18. Earls MF, Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health American Academy of Pediatrics. Incorporating recognition and management of perinatal and postpartum depression into pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2010; 126: 1032-9.
19. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Antenatal and postnatal mental health: clinical management and service guidance. London, UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2014.
20. Thombs BD, Arthurs E, Coronado-Montoya S, et al. Depression screening and patient outcomes in pregnancy or postpartum: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res 2014; 76: 433-46.
21. Thombs BD, Ziegelstein RC. Does depression screening improve depression outcomes in primary care? BMJ 2014; 348: g1253.
22. Thombs BD, Ziegelstein RC, Roseman M, et al. There are no randomized controlled trials that support the United States Preventive Services Task Force guideline on screening for depression in primary care: a systematic review. BMC Med 2014; 12: 13.
23. Shakespeare J. Evaluation of screening for postnatal depression against the NSC handbook criteria. UK: National Screening Committee, 2001.
24. Hill C. An evaluation of screening for postnatal depression against NSC criteria. UK: National Screening Committee, 2010.
25. Health Information Standards Committee for Alberta. Alberta postpartum depression data set. Edmonton: Government of Alberta, 2009.
26. Direction générale des services de sante et médecine universitaire. Politique de périnatalité 2008-2018. Quebec: Sante et services sociaux Québec, 2012.
27. Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario. Interventions for postpartum depression. ON, Canada: Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, 2005.
28. Joffres M, Jaramillo A, Dickinson J, et al. Recommendations on screening for depression in adults. CMAJ 2013; 185: 775-82.
29. Hewitt C, Gilbody S, Brealey S, et al. Methods to identify postnatal depression in primary care: an integrated evidence synthesis and value of information analysis. Health Technol Assess 2009; 13: 1-145, 147-230.
30. Thombs BD, de Jonge P, Coyne JC, et al. Depression screening and patient outcomes in cardiovascular care: a systematic review. JAMA 2008; 300: 2161-71.
31. Meijer A, Roseman M, Milette K, et al. Depression screening and patient outcomes in cancer: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 2011; 6: e27181.
32. Meader N, Mitchell AJ, Chew-Graham C, et al. Case identification of depression in patients with chronic physical health problems: a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of 113 studies. Br J Gen Pract 2011; 61: e808-20.
33. Meader N, Moe-Byrne T, Llewellyn A, et al. Screening for poststroke major depression: a meta-analysis of diagnostic validity studies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014; 85: 198-206.
34. Manea L, Gilbody S, McMillan D. Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2012; 184: e191-6.
35. Brennan C, Worrall-Davies A, McMillan D, et al. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: a diagnostic meta-analysis of case-finding ability. J Psychosom Res 2010; 69: 371-8.
36. Thombs BD, Arthurs E, El-Baalbaki G, et al. Risk of bias from inclusion of already diagnosed or treated patients in diagnostic accuracy studies of depression screening tools: a systematic review. BMJ 2011; 343: d4825.
37. Riley RD, Lambert PC, Abo-Zaid G. Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting. BMJ 2010; 340: c221.
38. Stewart LA, Tierney JF, Clarke M. Chapter 18: reviews of individual patient data. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011: 18.1-18.9.
39. Jaspers GJ, Degraeuwe PL. A failed attempt to conduct an individual patient data meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2014; 3: 97.
40. Parish E, Bloom T, Godlee F. Statins for people at low risk. BMJ 2015; 351: h3908.
41. Thombs BD, Benedetti A, Kloda LA, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of the patient health questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), patient health questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), and patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for detecting major depression: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses. Syst Rev 2014; 3: 124.
42. Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Gatsonis C. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 1.0.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009.
43. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
44. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097.
45. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000100.
46. Sampson M, Barrowman NJ, Moher D, et al. Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline? J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 943-55.
47. Mann R, Gilbody SM. Should methodological filters for diagnostic test accuracy studies be used in systematic reviews of psychometric instruments? A case study involving screening for postnatal depression. Syst Rev 2012; 1: 9.
48. Ingui BJ, Rogers MA. Searching for clinical prediction rules in MEDLINE. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 8: 391-7.
49. Wong SS, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB, et al. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting sound clinical prediction studies in MEDLINE. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003: 728-32.
50. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, et al. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders-Patient Edition (SCID-I/P, Version 2.0). New York: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1996.
51. Wittchen HU. Reliability and validity studies of the WHO-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review. J Psychiatr Res 1994; 28: 57-84.
52. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 529-36.
53. Riley RD, Dodd SR, Craig JV, et al. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data. Stat Med 2008; 27: 6111-36.
54. United Nations Development Programme. Human development report 2013. The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a DiverseWorld. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme, 2013.
55. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539-58.
56. Neuhaus JM, Kalbfleisch JD. Between- and within-cluster covariate effects in the analysis of clustered data. Biometrics 1998; 54: 638-45.
57. Simmonds MC, Higgins JP. Covariate heterogeneity in meta-analysis: criteria for deciding between meta-regression and individual patient data. Stat Med 2007; 26: 2982-99.
58. Berlin JA, Santanna J, Schmid CH, et al. Individual patient- versus group-level data meta-regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head. Stat Med 2002; 21: 371-87.
59. Lambert PC, Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, et al. A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55: 86-94.
60. Schmid CH, Stark PC, Berlin JA, et al. Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factors. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57: 683-97.
61. Robertson E, Grace S, Wallington T, et al. Antenatal risk factors for postpartum depression: a synthesis of recent literature. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2004; 26: 289-95.
62. Lancaster CA, Gold KJ, Flynn HA, et al. Risk factors for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202: 5-14.
63. Rubertsson C, Wickberg B, Gustavsson P, et al. Depressive symptoms in early pregnancy, two months and one year postpartum-prevalence and psychosocial risk factors in a national Swedish sample. Arch Womens Ment Health 2005; 8: 97-104.
64. Leigh B, Milgrom J. Risk factors for antenatal depression, postnatal depression and parenting stress. BMC Psychiatry 2008; 8: 24.
65. Rich-Edwards JW, Kleinman K, Abrams A, et al. Sociodemographic predictors of antenatal and postpartum depressive symptoms among women in a medical group practice. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60: 221-7.
66. Steyerberg EW. Clinical prediction models. New York: Springer, 2009.
67. Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE, Borsboom GJ, et al. Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54: 774-81.
68. White IR, Royston P. Imputing missing covariate values for the Cox model. Stat Med 2009; 28: 1982-98.
69. Riley RD, Takwoingi Y, Trikalinos T, et al. Meta-analysis of test accuracy studies with multiple and missing thresholds: a multivariate-normal model. J Biomed Biostat 2014; 5: 196.
70. Dobbins M, DeCorby K, Twiddy T. A knowledge transfer strategy for public health decision makers. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2004; 1: 120-8.
71. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006; 26: 13-24.
72. Haines A, Kuruvilla S, Borchert M. Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health. Bull World Health Organ 2004; 82: 724-31.
73. Dobbins M, Thomas H, O'Brien MA, et al. Use of systematic reviews in the development of new provincial public health policies in Ontario. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004; 20: 399-404.
74. Dobbins M, Jack S, Thomas H, et al. Public health decision-makers' informational needs and preferences for receiving research evidence. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2007; 4: 156-63.
75. Lavis J, Davies H, Oxman A, et al. Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005; 10 (Suppl 1): 35-48.
76. Beaulieu MD, Proulx M, Jobin G, et al. When is knowledge ripe for primary care? An exploratory study on the meaning of evidence. Eval Health Prof 2008; 31: 22-42.