Between- and within-cluster covariate effects in the analysis of clustered data

Biometrics

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 638-645

  Neuhaus, J M ^a   Kalbfleisch, J D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bias; Conditional likelihood; Misspecified models

Indexed keywords

BETWEEN CLUSTERS; BIAS; CLUSTER EFFECTS; CLUSTERED DATUM; CONDITIONAL LIKELIHOOD; COVARIATES; LIKELIHOOD METHODS; MISSPECIFIED MODELS; MIXTURE MODELING; WITHIN CLUSTERS;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; OPHTHALMOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORY;

EID: 0031776315     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3109770     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Breslow, N. E. and Clayton, D. G. (1993). Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, 9-25.
2. Diggle, P. J., Liang, K.-Y., and Zeger, S. L. (1994). Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. Hastie, T. J. and Tibshirani, R. J. (1990). Generalized Additive Models. London: Chapman and Hall.
4. Laird, N. and Ware, J. H. (1982). Random effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38, 963-974.
5. Liang, K.-Y. and Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalised linear models. Biometrika 73, 13-22.
6. Lindsay, B., Clogg, C. C., and Grego, J. (1991). Semiparametric estimation in the Rasch model and related exponential response models, including a simple latent class model for item analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 86, 96-107.
7. Louis, T. A. (1988). General methods for analyzing repeated measures. Statistics in Medicine 7, 29-45.
8. Louis, T. A., Robins, J., Dockery, D. W., Spiro, A., and Ware, J. H. (1986). Explaining discrepancies between longitudinal and cross-sectional models. Journal of Chronic Diseases 39, 831-839.
9. Neuhaus, J. M. and Jewell, N. P. (1993). A geometric approach to assess bias due to omitted covariates in generalized linear models. Biometrika 80, 807-816.
10. Neuhaus, J. M. and Lesperance, M. L. (1996). Estimation efficiency in a binary mixed-effects model setting. Biometrika 83, 441-446.
11. Neuhaus, J. M., Kalbfleisch, J. D., and Hauck, W. W. (1991). A comparison of cluster-specific and population-averaged approaches for analyzing correlated binary data. International Statistical Review 59, 25-35.
12. Neuhaus, J. M., Kalbfleisch, J. D., and Hauck, W. W. (1994). Conditions for consistent estimation in mixed-effects models for binary matched pairs data. Canadian Journal of Statistics 22, 139-148.
13. Scott, A. J. and Holt, D. (1982). The effect of two-stage sampling on ordinary least squares methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77, 848-854.
14. Stiratelli, R., Laird, N., and Ware, J. H. (1984). Random-effects model for serial observations with binary response. Biometrics 40, 961-971.
15. TenHave, T. R., Landis, J. R., and Weaver, S. L. (1995). Association models for periodontal disease progression: A comparison of methods for clustered binary data. Statistics in Medicine 14, 413-429.
16. Ware, J. H., Dockery, D. W., Louis, T. A., Xu, X., Ferris, B. G., and Speizer, F. (1990). Longitudinal and cross-sectional estimates of pulmonary function decline in never-smoking adults. American Journal of Epidemiology 132, 685-700.