Evaluation of hydrologic benefits of infiltration based urban storm water management

Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 205-215

  Holman Dodds, Jennifer K ^a   Bradley, A Allen ^a   Potter, Kenneth W ^b  

^a University of Iowa   (United States)

^b 1269C Engineering Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Infiltration and soil moisture; Infiltration based storm water management; Low impact development; Modeling; Storm hydrograph; Surface water hydrology; Water budget

Indexed keywords

HYDROLOGY; INFILTRATION; STORM SEWERS; URBAN PLANNING;

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT;

STORMS;

HYDROGRAPH; INFILTRATION; MODELING; STORMWATER; WATER BUDGET; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0037297062     PISSN: 1093474X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb01572.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alley, W. M. and J. E. Veenhuis, 1983. Effective Impervious Area in Urban Runoff Modeling. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 109(2):313-319.
2. Andrews, E. D., 1986. Downstream Effects of Flaming Gorge Reservoir on the Green River. Geological Society of America Bulletin 97:1012-1023.
3. Booth, D. B., 1990. Stream-Channel Incision Following Drainage-Basin Urbanization. Water Resources Bulletin 26(3):407-417.
4. Booth, D. B. and C. R. Jackson, 1997. Urbanization of Aquatic Systems: Degradation Thresholds, Storm water Detention, and the Limits of Mitigation. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33(5):1077-1090.
5. Croley, T. E., R. N. Eli, and J. D. Cryer, 1978. Ralston Creek Hourly Precipitation Model. Water Resources Research 14(3):485-490.
6. Fayer, M. J., 2000. UNSAT-H Version 3.0: Unsaturated Soil Water and Heat Flow Model. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PNNL-13249, 184 pp.
7. Hammer, T. R., 1972. Stream Channel Enlargement Due to Urbanization. Water Resources Research 8(6):1530-1540.
8. Hester, J. W., T. L. Thurow, and C. A. Taylor, 1997. Hydrologic Characteristics of Vegetation Types as Affected by Prescribed Burning. Journal of Range Management 50(2):199-204.
9. Horton, R. E., 1933. The Role of Infiltration in the Hydrologic Cycle. Transactions, American Geophysical Union 14:446-460.
10. Huff, F. A. and J. R. Angel, 1992. Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the Midwest. Bulletin 71, Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, Illinois.
11. James, L. D., 1965. Using a Digital Computer to Estimate the Effects of Urban Development on Flood Peaks. Water Resources Research 1(2):223-234.
12. Janstrow, J. D., 1987. Changes in Soil Aggregation Associated With Tallgrass Prairie Restoration. American Journal of Botany 74(11):1656-1664.
13. Kolski, K., S. Burges, and B. Jensen, 1995. Hydrologic Response of Residential-Scale Lawns on Till Containing Various Amounts of Compost Amendment. Water Resources Technical Report No. 147, University of Washington Department of Civil Engineering, Seattle, Washington.
14. Konrad, C. P. and S. J. Burges, 2001. Hydrologic Mitigation Using On-Site Residential Storm-Water Detention. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 127(2):99-107.
15. Kumar, S. and S. C. Jain, 1982. Application of SCS Infiltration Model. Water Resources Bulletin 18(3):503-507.
16. Lakatos, D. F. and R. H. Kropp, 1982. Storm water Detention: Downstream Effects on Peak Flows. In: Storm water Detention Facilities, W. DeGroot (Editor). American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, New York, pp. 105-120.
17. McCuen, R. H., 1982. A Guide to Hydrologic Analysis Using SCS Methods. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
18. McGinty, A., T. L. Thurow, and C. A. Taylor, 1991. Improving Rainfall Effectiveness on Rangeland. Publication L-5029, Texas Agricultural Extension Service.
19. Patchett, J. M. and G. S. Wilhelm, 1997. The Ecology and Culture of Water. Conservation Design Forum, Inc., Naperville, Illinois.
20. Pitt, R., J. Lantrip, R. Harrison, C. L. Henry, and D. Xue, 1999. Infiltration Through Disturbed Urban Soils and Compost-Amended Soil Effects on Runoff Quality and Quantity. EPA/600/R-00/016, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
21. Prince George's County, 1999. Low-Impact Development Design Strategies: An Integrated Design Approach. Department of Environmental Resources, Programs and Planning Division, Prince George's County, Maryland.
22. Rawls, W. J., L. R. Ahuja, D. L. Brakensiek, and A. Shirmohammadi, 1993. Infiltration and Soil Water Movement. In: Handbook of Hydrology, D. R. Maidment (Editor). McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, New York.
23. Shen, H. W. and P. Y. Julien. 1993. Erosion and Sediment Transport. In: Handbook of Hydrology, D. R. Maidment (Editor). McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, New York.
24. Soil Conservation Service, 1986. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. Technical Release No. 55, Soil Conservation Service.
25. Strecker, E. W. 2001. Low Impact Development (LID): How Low Impact Is It? Water Resources IMPACT 3:10-15.
26. Tourbier, J. T., 1994. Open-Space Through Storm water Management. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49(1):14-21.
27. Wolman, M. G. and J. P. Miller, 1960. Magnitude and Frequency of Forces in Geomorphic Processes. Journal of Geology 68(1):54-74.
28. Wolman, M. G. and A. P. Schick, 1967. Effects of Construction on Fluvial Sediment, Urban and Suburban Areas of Maryland. Water Resources Research 3(2):451-464.