A possible explanation of low energy γ-ray excess from galactic centre and Fermi bubble by a Dark Matter model with two real scalars

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Modak, Kamakshya Prasad ^a   Majumdar, Debasish ^a   Rakshit, Subhendu ^b  

^a SAHA INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INDORE   (India)

Author keywords

Dark matter experiments; Dark matter theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945184718     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14757516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/03/011     Document Type: Article

References (124)

1. WMAP collaboration, C.L. Bennett et al., First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Preliminary maps and basic results, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148 (2003) 1 [astro-ph/0302207] [INSPIRE].
2. WMAP collaboration, D.N. Spergel et al., Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) three year results: implications for cosmology, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 170 (2007) 377 [astro-ph/0603449] [INSPIRE].
3. WMAP collaboration, G. Hinshaw et al., Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 208 (2013) 19 [arXiv:1212.5226] [INSPIRE].
4. W.J. Percival, R.C. Nichol, D.J. Eisenstein, D.H. Weinberg, M. Fukugita et al., Measuring the matter density using baryon oscillations in the SDSS, Astrophys. J. 657 (2007) 51 [astro-ph/0608635] [INSPIRE].
5. Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 571 (2014) A16 [arXiv:1303.5076] [INSPIRE].
6. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 267 (1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380] [INSPIRE].
7. K. Griest and M. Kamionkowski, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 333 (2000) 167 [INSPIRE].
8. G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175] [INSPIRE].
9. H. Murayama, Physics Beyond the Standard Model and Dark Matter, arXiv:0704.2276 [INSPIRE].
10. H.-C. Cheng, J.L. Feng and K.T. Matchev, Kaluza-Klein dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 211301 [hep-ph/0207125] [INSPIRE].
11. G. Servant and T.M.P. Tait, Is the lightest Kaluza-Klein particle a viable dark matter candidate?, Nucl. Phys. B 650 (2003) 391 [hep-ph/0206071] [INSPIRE].
12. T. Araki, C.Q. Geng and K.I. Nagao, Dark Matter in Inert Triplet Models, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 075014 [arXiv:1102.4906] [INSPIRE].
13. K.P. Modak and D. Majumdar, Gamma Ray and Neutrino Flux from Annihilation of Neutralino Dark Matter at Galactic Halo Region in mAMSB Model, J. Phys. G 40 (2013) 075201 [arXiv:1205.1996] [INSPIRE].
14. R. Kappl, M. Ratz and M.W. Winkler, Light dark matter in the singlet-extended MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 169 [arXiv:1010.0553] [INSPIRE].
15. L.D. Duffy and K. van Bibber, Axions as Dark Matter Particles, New J. Phys. 11 (2009) 105008 [arXiv:0904.3346] [INSPIRE].
16. Y.G. Kim, K.Y. Lee and S. Shin, Singlet fermionic dark matter, JHEP 05 (2008) 100 [arXiv:0803.2932] [INSPIRE].
17. L. Lopez Honorez, E. Nezri, J.F. Oliver and M.H.G. Tytgat, The Inert Doublet Model: An Archetype for Dark Matter, JCAP 02 (2007) 028 [hep-ph/0612275] [INSPIRE].
18. V. Silveira and A. Zee, Scalar Phantoms, Phys. Lett. B 161 (1985) 136 [INSPIRE].
19. M.J.G. Veltman and F.J. Yndurain, Radiative corrections to WW scattering, Nucl. Phys. B 325 (1989) 1 [INSPIRE].
20. C.P. Burgess, M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, The Minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: A Singlet scalar, Nucl. Phys. B 619 (2001) 709 [hep-ph/0011335] [INSPIRE].
21. V. Barger, P. Langacker, M. McCaskey, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy, LHC Phenomenology of an Extended Standard Model with a Real Scalar Singlet, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 035005 [arXiv:0706.4311] [INSPIRE].
22. M. Gonderinger, Y. Li, H. Patel and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Vacuum Stability, Perturbativity and Scalar Singlet Dark Matter, JHEP 01 (2010) 053 [arXiv:0910.3167] [INSPIRE].
23. A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Chakraborty, A. Ghosal and D. Majumdar, Constraining Scalar Singlet Dark Matter with CDMS, XENON and DAMA and Prediction for Direct Detection Rates, JHEP 11 (2010) 065 [arXiv:1003.0809] [INSPIRE].
24. X.-G. He, T. Li, X.-Q. Li, J. Tandean and H.-C. Tsai, Constraints on Scalar Dark Matter from Direct Experimental Searches, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 023521 [arXiv:0811.0658] [INSPIRE].
25. X.-G. He, T. Li, X.-Q. Li, J. Tandean and H.-C. Tsai, The Simplest Dark-Matter Model, CDMS II Results and Higgs Detection at LHC, Phys. Lett. B 688 (2010) 332 [arXiv:0912.4722] [INSPIRE].
26. M.C. Bento, O. Bertolami and R. Rosenfeld, Cosmological constraints on an invisibly decaying Higgs boson, Phys. Lett. B 518 (2001) 276 [hep-ph/0103340] [INSPIRE].
27. H. Davoudiasl, R. Kitano, T. Li and H. Murayama, The New minimal standard model, Phys. Lett. B 609 (2005) 117 [hep-ph/0405097] [INSPIRE].
28. J.J. van der Bij, The Minimal non-minimal standard model, Phys. Lett. B 636 (2006) 56 [hep-ph/0603082] [INSPIRE].
29. Y. Cai, X.-G. He and B. Ren, Low Mass Dark Matter and Invisible Higgs Width In Darkon Models, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 083524 [arXiv:1102.1522] [INSPIRE].
30. C.E. Yaguna, The Singlet Scalar as FIMP Dark Matter, JHEP 08 (2011) 060 [arXiv:1105.1654] [INSPIRE].
31. L.J. Hall and Y. Nomura, A Finely-Predicted Higgs Boson Mass from A Finely-Tuned Weak Scale, JHEP 03 (2010) 076 [arXiv:0910.2235] [INSPIRE].
32. S. Profumo, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy, Singlet Higgs phenomenology and the electroweak phase transition, JHEP 08 (2007) 010 [arXiv:0705.2425] [INSPIRE].
33. M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo and A. Strumia, CDMS stands for Constrained Dark Matter Singlet, Phys. Lett. B 688 (2010) 329 [arXiv:0912.5038] [INSPIRE].
34. J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin and F. Riva, Strong Electroweak Phase Transitions in the Standard Model with a Singlet, Nucl. Phys. B 854 (2012) 592 [arXiv:1107.5441] [INSPIRE].
35. S.W. Ham, Y.S. Jeong and S.K. Oh, Electroweak phase transition in an extension of the standard model with a real Higgs singlet, J. Phys. G 31 (2005) 857 [hep-ph/0411352] [INSPIRE].
36. R.N. Lerner and J. McDonald, Gauge singlet scalar as inflaton and thermal relic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 123507 [arXiv:0909.0520] [INSPIRE].
37. J.M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, P. Scott and C. Weniger, Update on scalar singlet dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055025 [arXiv:1306.4710] [INSPIRE].
38. Y. Mambrini, M.H.G. Tytgat, G. Zaharijas and B. Zaldivar, Complementarity of Galactic radio and collider data in constraining WIMP dark matter models, JCAP 11 (2012) 038 [arXiv:1206.2352] [INSPIRE].
39. A. Djouadi, A. Falkowski, Y. Mambrini and J. Quevillon, Direct Detection of Higgs-Portal Dark Matter at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2455 [arXiv:1205.3169] [INSPIRE].
40. W.-L. Guo and Y.-L. Wu, The Real singlet scalar dark matter model, JHEP 10 (2010) 083 [arXiv:1006.2518] [INSPIRE].
41. D.E. Holz and A. Zee, Collisional dark matter and scalar phantoms, Phys. Lett. B 517 (2001) 239 [hep-ph/0105284] [INSPIRE].
42. J. McDonald, Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 3637 [hep-ph/0702143] [INSPIRE].
43. V. Barger, P. Langacker, M. McCaskey, M. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy, Complex Singlet Extension of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 015018 [arXiv:0811.0393] [INSPIRE].
44. V. Barger, M. McCaskey and G. Shaughnessy, Complex Scalar Dark Matter vis-à-vis CoGeNT, DAMA/LIBRA and XENON100, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 035019 [arXiv:1005.3328] [INSPIRE].
45. M. Gonderinger, H. Lim and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Complex Scalar Singlet Dark Matter: Vacuum Stability and Phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 043511 [arXiv:1202.1316] [INSPIRE].
46. A. Abada, D. Ghaffor and S. Nasri, A Two-Singlet Model for Light Cold Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 095021 [arXiv:1101.0365] [INSPIRE].
47. A. Abada and S. Nasri, Renormalization group equations of a cold dark matter two-singlet model, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 016006 [arXiv:1304.3917] [INSPIRE].
48. K.R. Dienes, J. Kumar and B. Thomas, Dynamical Dark Matter and the positron excess in light of AMS results, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 103509 [arXiv:1306.2959] [INSPIRE].
49. K.R. Dienes, S. Su and B. Thomas, Distinguishing Dynamical Dark Matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 054008 [arXiv:1204.4183] [INSPIRE].
50. K.R. Dienes and B. Thomas, Phenomenological Constraints on Axion Models of Dynamical Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 055013 [arXiv:1203.1923] [INSPIRE].
51. K.R. Dienes and B. Thomas, Dynamical Dark Matter: II. An Explicit Model, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 083524 [arXiv:1107.0721] [INSPIRE].
52. K.R. Dienes and B. Thomas, Dynamical Dark Matter: I. Theoretical Overview, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 083523 [arXiv:1106.4546] [INSPIRE].
53. K.R. Dienes, J. Kumar and B. Thomas, Direct Detection of Dynamical Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 055016 [arXiv:1208.0336] [INSPIRE].
54. CDMS-II collaboration, Z. Ahmed et al., Dark Matter Search Results from the CDMS II Experiment, Science 327 (2010) 1619 [arXiv:0912.3592] [INSPIRE].
55. CDMS collaboration, R. Agnese et al., Silicon detector results from the first five-tower run of CDMS II, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 031104 [arXiv:1304.3706] [INSPIRE].
56. CDMS collaboration, R. Agnese et al., Silicon Detector Dark Matter Results from the Final Exposure of CDMS II, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 251301 [arXiv:1304.4279] [INSPIRE].
57. DAMA collaboration, R. Bernabei et al., First results from DAMA/LIBRA and the combined results with DAMA/NaI, Eur. Phys. J. C 56 (2008) 333 [arXiv:0804.2741] [INSPIRE].
58. DAMA/LIBRA collaborations, R. Bernabei et al., New results from DAMA/LIBRA, Eur. Phys. J. C 67 (2010) 39 [arXiv:1002.1028] [INSPIRE].
59. CoGeNT collaboration, C.E. Aalseth et al., Results from a Search for Light-Mass Dark Matter with a P-type Point Contact Germanium Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 131301 [arXiv:1002.4703] [INSPIRE].
60. G. Angloher, M. Bauer, I. Bavykina, A. Bento, C. Bucci et al., Results from 730 kg days of the CRESST-II Dark Matter Search, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1971 [arXiv:1109.0702] [INSPIRE].
61. B. Kyae and J.-C. Park, Light dark matter for Fermi-LAT and CDMS observations, Phys. Lett. B 732 (2014) 373 [arXiv:1310.2284] [INSPIRE].
62. G. Bélanger, A. Goudelis, J.-C. Park and A. Pukhov, Isospin-violating dark matter from a double portal, JCAP 02 (2014) 020 [arXiv:1311.0022] [INSPIRE].
63. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark Matter Results from 100 Live Days of XENON100 Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 131302 [arXiv:1104.2549] [INSPIRE].
64. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark Matter Results from 225 Live Days of XENON100 Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 181301 [arXiv:1207.5988] [INSPIRE].
65. LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv:1310.8214] [INSPIRE].
66. LAT collaboration, W.B. Atwood et al., The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Mission, Astrophys. J. 697 (2009) 1071 [arXiv:0902.1089] [INSPIRE].
67. D. Hooper and L. Goodenough, Dark Matter Annihilation in The Galactic Center As Seen by the Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope, Phys. Lett. B 697 (2011) 412 [arXiv:1010.2752] [INSPIRE].
68. A. Boyarsky, D. Malyshev and O. Ruchayskiy, A comment on the emission from the Galactic Center as seen by the Fermi telescope, Phys. Lett. B 705 (2011) 165 [arXiv:1012.5839] [INSPIRE].
69. M. Su, T.R. Slatyer and D.P. Finkbeiner, Giant Gamma-ray Bubbles from Fermi-LAT: AGN Activity or Bipolar Galactic Wind?, Astrophys. J. 724 (2010) 1044 [arXiv:1005.5480] [INSPIRE].
70. W.-C. Huang, A. Urbano and W. Xue, Fermi Bubbles under Dark Matter Scrutiny. Part I: Astrophysical Analysis, arXiv:1307.6862 [INSPIRE].
71. W.-C. Huang, A. Urbano and W. Xue, Fermi Bubbles under Dark Matter Scrutiny Part II: Particle Physics Analysis, JCAP 04 (2014) 020 [arXiv:1310.7609] [INSPIRE].
72. D. Hooper and T.R. Slatyer, Two Emission Mechanisms in the Fermi Bubbles: A Possible Signal of Annihilating Dark Matter, Phys. Dark Univ. 2 (2013) 118 [arXiv:1302.6589] [INSPIRE].
73. K. Kannike, Vacuum Stability Conditions From Copositivity Criteria, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2093 [arXiv:1205.3781] [INSPIRE].
74. K. Hadeler, On copositive matrices, Linear Algebra Appl. 49 (1983) 79.
75. G. Chang, T.W. Sederberg, Nonnegative quadratic Bézier triangular patches, Comput. Aided Geom. D. 11 (1994) 113.
76. J. Chakrabortty, P. Konar and T. Mondal, Copositive Criteria and Boundedness of the Scalar Potential, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 095008 [arXiv:1311.5666] [INSPIRE].
77. B.W. Lee, C. Quigg and H.B. Thacker, Weak Interactions at Very High-Energies: The Role of the Higgs Boson Mass, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1519 [INSPIRE].
78. G. Cynolter, E. Lendvai and G. Pocsik, Note on unitarity constraints in a model for a singlet scalar dark matter candidate, Acta Phys. Polon. B 36 (2005) 827 [hep-ph/0410102] [INSPIRE].
79. J.A. Casas, J.R. Espinosa and M. Quirós, Improved Higgs mass stability bound in the standard model and implications for supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 342 (1995) 171 [hep-ph/9409458] [INSPIRE].
80. G. Bélanger, B. Dumont, U. Ellwanger, J.F. Gunion and S. Kraml, Global fit to Higgs signal strengths and couplings and implications for extended Higgs sectors, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 075008 [arXiv:1306.2941] [INSPIRE].
81. S. Choi, S. Jung and P. Ko, Implications of LHC data on 125 GeV Higgs-like boson for the Standard Model and its various extensions, JHEP 10 (2013) 225 [arXiv:1307.3948] [INSPIRE].
82. S.K. Kang and J. Park, Unitarity Constraints in the standard model with a singlet scalar field, arXiv:1306.6713 [INSPIRE].
83. G. Bélanger, B. Dumont, U. Ellwanger, J.F. Gunion and S. Kraml, Status of invisible Higgs decays, Phys. Lett. B 723 (2013) 340 [arXiv:1302.5694] [INSPIRE].
84. A. Djouadi and G. Moreau, The couplings of the Higgs boson and its CP properties from fits of the signal strengths and their ratios at the 7+8 TeV LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2512 [arXiv:1303.6591] [INSPIRE].
85. S. Banerjee, S. Mukhopadhyay and B. Mukhopadhyaya, New Higgs interactions and recent data from the LHC and the Tevatron, JHEP 10 (2012) 062 [arXiv:1207.3588] [INSPIRE].
86. L. Carpenter, A. DiFranzo, M. Mulhearn, C. Shimmin, S. Tulin et al., Mono-Higgs-boson: A new collider probe of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 075017 [arXiv:1312.2592] [INSPIRE].
87. A.A. Petrov and W. Shepherd, Searching for dark matter at LHC with Mono-Higgs production, Phys. Lett. B 730 (2014) 178 [arXiv:1311.1511] [INSPIRE].
88. J. Edsjö and P. Gondolo, Neutralino relic density including coannihilations, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 1879 [hep-ph/9704361] [INSPIRE].
89. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, P. Brun, A. Pukhov, S. Rosier-Lees et al., Indirect search for dark matter with MicrOMEGAs 2.4, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 842 [arXiv:1004.1092] [INSPIRE].
90. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, micrOMEGAs 3: A program for calculating dark matter observables, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 960 [arXiv:1305.0237] [INSPIRE].
91. S. Profumo, K. Sigurdson and L. Ubaldi, Can we discover multi-component WIMP dark matter?, JCAP 12 (2009) 016 [arXiv:0907.4374] [INSPIRE].
92. C. Kelso, D. Hooper and M.R. Buckley, Toward A Consistent Picture For CRESST, CoGeNT and DAMA, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 043515 [arXiv:1110.5338] [INSPIRE].
93. Fermi-LAT collaboration, Fermi Large Area Telescope Second Source Catalog, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 199 (2012) 31 [arXiv:1108.1435] [INSPIRE].
94. P.M.W. Kalberla and J. Kerp, The HI Distribution of the Milky Way, Ann. Rev. Astron. A. 47 (2009) 27.
95. H. Nakanishi and Y. Sofue, Three-dimensional distribution of the ISM in the Milky Way Galaxy: 1. The HI disk, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap. 55 (2003) 191 [astro-ph/0304338] [INSPIRE].
96. N. Gehrels, Gamma Ray Sky Surveys, in proceedings of the 179th Symposium of the International Astronomical Union, (1996) 69.
97. M. Chernyakova, D. Malyshev, F.A. Aharonian, R.M. Crocker and D.I. Jones, The high-energy, Arcminute-scale galactic center gamma-ray source, Astrophys. J. 726 (2011) 60 [arXiv:1009.2630] [INSPIRE].
98. K.N. Abazajian, The Consistency of Fermi-LAT Observations of the Galactic Center with a Millisecond Pulsar Population in the Central Stellar Cluster, JCAP 03 (2011) 010 [arXiv:1011.4275] [INSPIRE].
99. A. Atoyan and C.D. Dermer, TeV emission from the Galactic Center black-hole plerion, Astrophys. J. 617 (2004) L123 [astro-ph/0410243] [INSPIRE].
100. D. Hooper and T. Linden, On The Origin Of The Gamma Rays From The Galactic Center, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 123005 [arXiv:1110.0006] [INSPIRE].
101. D. Hooper and T. Linden, Gamma Rays From The Galactic Center and the WMAP Haze, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 083517 [arXiv:1011.4520] [INSPIRE].
102. D. Hooper, C. Kelso and F.S. Queiroz, Stringent and Robust Constraints on the Dark Matter Annihilation Cross section From the Region of the Galactic Center, Astropart. Phys. 46 (2013) 55 [arXiv:1209.3015] [INSPIRE].
103. D. Hooper, The Empirical Case For 10GeV Dark Matter, Phys. Dark Univ. 1 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1201.1303] [INSPIRE].
104. J.N. Bahcall and R.M. Soneira, The Universe at faint magnetidues. 2. Models for the predicted star counts, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 44 (1980) 73 [INSPIRE].
105. J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White, The Structure of cold dark matter halos, Astrophys. J. 462 (1996) 563 [astro-ph/9508025] [INSPIRE].
106. J. Einasto, Influence of the atmospheric and instrumental dispersion on the brightness distribution in a galaxy, Trudy Inst. Astroz. Alma-Ata 51 (1965) 87.
107. B. Moore, T.R. Quinn, F. Governato, J. Stadel and G. Lake, Cold collapse and the core catastrophe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 310 (1999) 1147 [astro-ph/9903164] [INSPIRE].
108. J. Diemand, B. Moore and J. Stadel, Convergence and scatter of cluster density profiles, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 353 (2004) 624 [astro-ph/0402267] [INSPIRE].
109. B. Moore, F. Governato, T.R. Quinn, J. Stadel and G. Lake, Resolving the structure of cold dark matter halos, Astrophys. J. 499 (1998) L5 [astro-ph/9709051] [INSPIRE].
110. G. Dobler, D.P. Finkbeiner, I. Cholis, T.R. Slatyer and N. Weiner, The Fermi Haze: A Gamma-Ray Counterpart to the Microwave Haze, Astrophys. J. 717 (2010) 825 [arXiv:0910.4583] [INSPIRE].
111. D.P. Finkbeiner, Microwave interstellar medium emission observed by wmap, Astrophys. J. 614 (2004) 186 [astro-ph/0311547] [INSPIRE].
112. Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck Intermediate Results. IX. Detection of the Galactic haze with Planck, Astron. Astrophys. 554 (2013) A139 [arXiv:1208.5483] [INSPIRE].
113. S.L. Snowden, R. Egger, M.J. Freyberg, D. McCammon, P.P. Plucinsky et al., ROSAT Survey Diffuse X-Ray Background Maps. II., Astrophys. J. 485 (1997) 125 [INSPIRE].
114. P. Mertsch and S. Sarkar, Fermi gamma-ray 'bubbles' from stochastic acceleration of electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 091101 [arXiv:1104.3585] [INSPIRE].
115. K.N. Abazajian and M. Kaplinghat, Detection of a Gamma-Ray Source in the Galactic Center Consistent with Extended Emission from Dark Matter Annihilation and Concentrated Astrophysical Emission, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 083511 [Erratum ibid. D 87 (2013) 129902] [arXiv:1207.6047] [INSPIRE].
116. R.S. Wharton, S. Chatterjee, J.M. Cordes, J.S. Deneva and T.J.W. Lazio, Multiwavelength Constraints on Pulsar Populations in the Galactic Center, Astrophys. J. 753 (2012) 108 [arXiv:1111.4216] [INSPIRE].
117. T. Linden, E. Lovegrove and S. Profumo, The Morphology of Hadronic Emission Models for the Gamma-Ray Source at the Galactic Center, Astrophys. J. 753 (2012) 41 [arXiv:1203.3539] [INSPIRE].
118. T. Linden and S. Profumo, Exploring the Nature of the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Source with the Cherenkov Telescope Array, Astrophys. J. 760 (2012) 23 [arXiv:1206.4308] [INSPIRE].
119. L.A. Anchordoqui and B.J. Vlcek, W-WIMP Annihilation as a Source of the Fermi Bubbles, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 043513 [arXiv:1305.4625] [INSPIRE].
120. K. Hagiwara, S. Mukhopadhyay and J. Nakamura, 10GeV neutralino dark matter and light stau in the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 015023 [arXiv:1308.6738] [INSPIRE].
121. XENON1T collaboration, E. Aprile, The XENON1T Dark Matter Search Experiment, Springer Proc. Phys. C12-02-22 (2013) 93 [arXiv:1206.6288] [INSPIRE].
122. J.R. Ellis, K.A. Olive, Y. Santoso and V.C. Spanos, Update on the direct detection of supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 095007 [hep-ph/0502001] [INSPIRE].
123. J.R. Ellis, A. Ferstl and K.A. Olive, Reevaluation of the elastic scattering of supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 481 (2000) 304 [hep-ph/0001005] [INSPIRE].
124. M. Cirelli, G. Corcella, A. Hektor, G. Hutsi, M. Kadastik et al., PPPC 4 DM ID: A Poor Particle Physicist Cookbook for Dark Matter Indirect Detection, JCAP 03 (2011) 051 [Erratum ibid. 1210 (2012) E01] [arXiv:1012.4515] [INSPIRE].