Hybrid courses with flexible participation: The hyflex course design

Practical Applications and Experiences in K-20 Blended Learning Environments

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 153-177

  Beatty, Brian ^a  

^a SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945156358     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4912-5.ch011     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. American Psychological Association. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school redesign and reform. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ed/lcp.html
2. Beatty, B. J. (2007, October). Hybrid classes with flexible participation options-If you build it, how will they come? In Proceedings of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology International Conference. Anaheim, CA: AECT.
3. Beatty, B. J. (2007, June). Transitioning to an online world: Using hyflex courses to bridge the gap. In Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2007 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications. Vancouver, Canada: ED-MEDIA.
4. Bullen, M. (n.d.). Andragogy and university distance education. Retrieved from http://www2.cstudies.ubc.ca/-bullen/bullen1.html
5. Ford, M. B., Burns, C. E., Mitch, N., & Gomez, M. M. (2012). The effectiveness of classroom capture technology. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(3), 191-201. doi:10.1177/1469787412452982
6. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems:Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
7. Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (1998). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
9. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics:II: Channels of group life, social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1(2), 143-153. doi:10.1177/001872674700100201
10. Lewin, K. (1958). Group decision and social change. In E. E. Maccoby, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 197-211). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
11. Mager, R. (1997). Preparing instructional objectives (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Fearon Press.
12. Moore, G. A. (2002). Crossing the chasm. New York: Harper Collins.
13. Reigeluth, C. M. (2011). An instructional theory for the post-industrial age. Educational Technology, 51(5), 25-29.
14. Reigeluth, C. M., & Frick, T. (1999). Formative research: A methodology for creating and improving design theories. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models:A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 633-651). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
16. Rose, D. H., & Gravel, J. W. (2010). Universal design for learning. In E. Baker, P. Peterson, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00719-3
17. SFSU Academic Senate. (2012). Online education policy, #F12-264. San Francisco, CA: Academic Senate, San Francisco State University.
18. United States Government. (1998). Section 508 of the rehabilitation act (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended by the workforce investment act of 1998 (pp.L. 105-220).
19. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States, 2011. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/goingthedistance.pdf
20. Beatty, B. J. (n.d.). The hyflex world blog. Retrieved from http://www.drbrianbeatty.com/wordpress/
21. Bonk, C. J. (2009). The world is open. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22. Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2006). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
23. Caufield, J. (2011). How to design and teach a hybrid course: Achieving student-centered learning through blended classroom, online, and experiential activities. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
24. Center for Technology in Learning. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning:A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Retrieved from www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/reports.html.
25. Dahlsrom, E. (2012). ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2012 (Research Report). Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ecar
26. Duffy, T. M., & Kirkley, J. R. (Eds.). (2004). Learner-centered theory and practice in distance education: Cases from higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28. Moore, M. G., & Anderson, W. G. (2003). Handbook of distance education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
30. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.