SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines From a Detailed Consensus Process

American Journal of Medical Quality

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 543-549

  Ogrinc, Greg ^a,b,c   Davies, Louise ^a,b,c   Goodman, Daisy ^a,d   Batalden, Paul ^a,c   Davidoff, Frank ^c   Stevens, David ^c,e  

^a DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b Veterans Affairs White River Junction Health Care System   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

^d VA Quality Scholars Fellowship Program   (United States)

^e INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

health care systems; quality improvement; scholarship; writing

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; NOMENCLATURE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

CONSENSUS; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 84945131757     PISSN: 10628606     EISSN: 1555824X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1062860615605176     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. F.DavidoffP.Batalden. Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:319-325.
2. Expanding Research and Evaluation Designs to Improve the Science Base for Health Care and Public Health Quality Improvement Symposium. September15, 2005; Washington, DC.
3. K.G.ShojaniaJ.M.Grimshaw. Evidence-based quality improvement: the state of the science. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(1):138-150.
4. R.P.GrolM.C.BoschM.E.HulscherM.P.EcclesM.Wensing. Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q. 2007;85(1):93-138.
5. L.V.RubensteinS.HempelM.M.Farmer. Finding order in heterogeneity: types of quality-improvement intervention publications. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:403-408.
6. F.DavidoffP.BataldenD.StevensG.OgrincS.Mooney. Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(suppl 1):i3-i9.
7. P.BataldenD.LeachS.SwingH.DreyfusS.Dreyfus. General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21(5):103-111.
8. Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice. Washington, DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative; 2011.
9. Association for American Medical Colleges. Teaching for quality. https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/cei/te4q/. Published 2013. Accessed Jun 21, 2013.
10. L.CronenwettG.SherwoodJ.Barnsteiner. Quality and safety education for nurses. Nurs Outlook. 2007;55(3):122-131.
11. T.J.NascaI.PhilibertT.BrighamT.C.Flynn. The next GME accreditation system—rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1051-1056.
12. F.DavidoffM.Dixon-WoodsL.LevitonS.Michie. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement [published online January 23, 2015]. BMJ Qual Saf. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627.
13. P.BateG.RobertN.FulopJ.OvretveitM.Dixon-Woods. Perspectives on Context. London, England: The Health Foundation; March2014.
14. H.C.KaplanL.P.ProvostC.M.FroehleP.A.Margolis. The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(1):13-20.
15. J.Øvretveit. Understanding the conditions for improvement: research to discover which context influences affect improvement success. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(suppl 1):i18-i23.
16. S.L.TaylorS.DyR.Foy. What context features might be important determinants of the effectiveness of patient safety practice interventions?BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:611-617.
17. T.C.HoffmannP.P.GlasziouI.Boutron. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
18. M.C.PortelaP.J.PronovostT.WoodcockP.CarterM.Dixon-Woods. How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24:325-336.
19. L.DaviesP.BataldenF.DavidoffD.StevensG.Ogrinc. The SQUIRE Guidelines: an evaluation from the field, five years post release [published online June 18, 2015]. BMJ Qual Saf. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004116.
20. V.HowellA.E.SchwartzJ.D.O’LearyC.Mc Donnell. The effect of the SQUIRE (Standards of QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines on reporting standards in the quality improvement literature: a before-and-after study [published online February 12, 2015]. BMJ Qual Saf. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003737.
21. D.Stevens. SQUIRE and the evolving science of healthcare improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24:349-351.
22. L.DaviesK.DonnellyD.GoodmanG.Ogrinc. Findings from a novel approach to publication guideline revision: user road testing of a draft version of SQUIRE 2.0 [published online August 11, 2015]. BMJ Qual Saf. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004117.
23. R.A.Day. The origins of the scientific paper: the IMRaD format. J Am Med Writers Assoc. 1989;4(2):16-18.
24. E.Huth. Writing and Publishing in Medicine. 3rd ed.Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1999.
25. M.BailyM.BottrellJ.LynnB.Jennings. The Ethics of Using QI Methods to Improve Health Care Quality and Safety. Garrison, NY: The Hastings Center; 2006.