Computer-aided breast MR image feature analysis for prediction of tumor response to chemotherapy

Medical Physics

Volumn 42, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 6520-6528

  Aghaei, Faranak ^a   Tan, Maxine ^a   Hollingsworth, Alan B ^b   Qian, Wei ^c   Liu, Hong ^a   Zheng, Bin ^a  

^a University of Oklahoma   (United States)

^b Mercy Health Center   (United States)

^c 500 W University Avenue   (United States)

Author keywords

assessment of breast cancer prognosis; dynamic contrast enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging; quantitative image feature analysis; tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; FORECASTING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; KINETICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL IMAGING; NEURAL NETWORKS; TUMORS;

ASSESSMENT OF BREAST CANCER PROGNOSE; BREAST CANCER PROGNOSIS; BREAST MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING; DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED; DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED BREAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; IMAGE FEATURE ANALYSIS; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPIES; QUANTITATIVE IMAGE FEATURE ANALYSE; QUANTITATIVE IMAGES; TUMOR RESPONSE; TUMOR RESPONSE TO NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY;

CHEMOTHERAPY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER PROGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TREATMENT RESPONSE; ALGORITHM; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DRUG MONITORING; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MACHINE LEARNING; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ALGORITHMS; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DRUG MONITORING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MACHINE LEARNING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84945126751     PISSN: 00942405     EISSN: 24734209     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1118/1.4933198     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. R. L. Siegel, K. D. Miller, and A. Jemal, " Cancer statistics, 2015," Ca-Cancer J. Clin. 65, 5-29 (2015). 10.3322/caac.21254
2. L. Tabar, B. Vitak, and H. H. Chen, " Beyond randomized controlled trials: Organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality," Cancer 91, 1724-1731 (2001). 10.1002/1097-0142(20010501)91:9¡1724::aid-cncr1190¿3.0.co;2-v
3. R. A. Smith et al., " Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening," Ca-Cancer J. Clin. 65, 30-54 (2015). 10.3322/caac.21261
4. J. J. Fenton, J. Wheeler, and P. A. Carney, " Reality check: Perceived versus actual performance of community mammographers," Am. J. Roentgenol. 187, 42-46 (2006). 10.2214/AJR.05.0455
5. L. Berlin and F. M. Hall, " More mammography muddle: Emotions, politics, science, costs and polarization," Radiology 255, 311-316 (2010). 10.1148/radiol.10100056
6. D. Saslow, C. Boetes, and W. Burke, " American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography," Ca-Cancer J. Clin. 57, 75-89 (2007). 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75
7. J. G. M. Klijn, " Early diagnosis of hereditary breast cancer by magnetic resonance imaging: What is realistic?," J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 1441-1445 (2010). 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3467
8. L. J. Graham, M. P. Shupe, and E. J. Schneble, " Current approaches and challenges in monitoring treatment 405 response in breast cancer," J. Cancer 5, 58-68 (2014). 10.7150/jca.7047
9. W. Chen, M. L. Giger, L. Lan, and U. Bick, " Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: Investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics," Med. Phys. 31, 1076-1086 (2004). 10.1118/1.1695652
10. S. Wu, S. Weinstein, E. Conant, M. Schnall, and D. Kontos, " Automated chest wall line detection for 410 whole-breast segmentation in sagittal breast MR images," Med. Phys. 40, 042301 12pp. (2013). 10.1118/1.4793255
11. K. Nie, J. H. Chen, J. H. Yu, Y. Chu, O. Nalcioqlu, and M. Y. Su, " Quantitative analysis of tumor morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI," Acad. Radiol. 15, 1513-1525 (2008). 10.1016/j.acra.2008.06.005
12. A. Karahaliou, K. Vassiou, N. S. Arikidis, S. Skiadopoulos, T. Kanavou, and L. Costaridou, " Assessing heterogeneity of tumor enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis," Br. J. Radiol. 83, 296-306 (2010). 10.1259/bjr/50743919
13. V. King, J. D. Brooks, and J. Bernstein, " Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk," Radiology 260, 50-60 (2011). 10.1148/radiol.11102156
14. Q. Yang, L. Li, J. Zhang, G. Shao, and B. Zheng, " A computerized image biomarker to assist diagnosis of breast cancer using breast magnetic resonance images: A preliminary assessment," J. Digital Imaging 27, 152-160 (2014). 10.1007/s10278-013-9617-4
15. Q. Yang, L. Li, J. Zhang, G. Shao, and B. Zheng, " A new quantitative image analysis method for improving breast cancer diagnosis using DCE-MRI examinations," Med. Phys. 42, 103-109 (2015). 10.1118/1.4903280
16. P. Therasse et al., " New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors," JNCI, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92, 205-216 (2000). 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205
17. E. A. Eisenhauer et al., " New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)," Eur. J. Cancer 45, 228-247 (2009). 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
18. A. Ahmed, P. Gibbs, M. Pickles, and L. Turnbull, " Texture analysis in assessment and prediction of chemotherapy response in breast cancer," J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 38, 89-101 (2013). 10.1002/jmri.23971
19. M. Koenig, H. Laue, T. Boehler, and H. Peitgen, " Automatic segmentation of relevant structures in DCE MR mammograms," Proc. SPIE 6514, 65141S (2007). 10.1117/12.708558
20. M. Y. Su, K. Nie, and J. H. Chen, " Development of a quantitative method for analysis of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI," Med. Phys. 35 (12), 5253-5262 (2008). 10.1118/1.3002306
21. J. H. Chen, W. K. Moon, and Y. W. Shen, " Comparative study of density analysis using automated whole breast ultrasound and MRI," Med. Phys. 38 (1), 382-389 (2011). 10.1118/1.3523617
22. Y. C. Chang, Y. H. Huang, C. S. Huang, J. H. Chen, and R. F. Chang, " Computerized breast tumors detection using kinetic and morphologic analysis for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI," J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 32, 514-522 (2014). 10.1016/j.mri.2014.01.008
23. Q. Yang, L. Li, J. Zhang, G. Shao, and B. Zheng, " A computerized global MR image feature analysis 440 scheme to assist diagnosis of breast cancer: A preliminary assessment," Eur. J. Radiol. 83, 1086-1091 (2014). 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.03.014
24. D. Lederman, B. Zheng, X. Wang, X. H. Wang, and D. Gur, " Improving breast cancer risk stratification using resonance-frequency electrical impedance spectroscopy through fusion of multiple classifiers," Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39, 931-945 (2011). 10.1007/s10439-010-0210-4
25. I. Witten, E. Frank, and M. A. Hall, Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 3rd ed. (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Elsevier, Burlington, MA, 2011), http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/.
26. R. Kohavi and G. H. John, " Wrappers for feature subset selection," Artif. Intell. 97, 273-324 (1997). 10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00043-X
27. Q. Li and K. Doi, " Reduction of bias and variance of evaluation of computer-aided diagnostic schemes," Med. Phys. 33, 868-875 (2006). 10.1118/1.2179750
28. N. V. Chawla, K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer, " SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique," J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321-357 (2002). 10.1613/jair.953
29. M. Tan, J. Pu, and B. Zheng, " A new and fast image feature selection method for the developing an optimal mammographic mass detection scheme," Med. Phys. 41, 081906 12pp. (2014). 10.1118/1.4890080
30. M. Tan, W. Qian, J. Pu, H. Liu, and B. Zheng, " A new approach to develop computer-aided detection schemes of digital mammograms," Phys. Med. Biol. 60, 4413-4427 (2015). 10.1088/0031-9155/60/11/4413