Texture analysis in assessment and prediction of chemotherapy response in breast cancer

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 89-101

  Ahmed, Arfan ^a   Gibbs, Peter ^a   Pickles, Martin ^a   Turnbull, Lindsay ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

breast cancer chemotherapy prediction; computer science informatics; Haralick co occurrence matrices; image processing; MRI contrast enhancement; texture analysis software

Indexed keywords

CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; DOCETAXEL; EPIRUBICIN; EXEMESTANE; PACLITAXEL; TAMOXIFEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER GRADING; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SIZE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIPLE CYCLE TREATMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT RESPONSE; TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER;

BREAST CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY PREDICTION; COMPUTER SCIENCE INFORMATICS; HARALICK CO-OCCURRENCE MATRICES; IMAGE PROCESSING; MRI CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; TEXTURE ANALYSIS SOFTWARE;

ADULT; AGED; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PREVALENCE; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84880123189     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23971     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Boyle P, Levin B,. World Cancer Report 2008. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2008.
2. Cancer research UK (May 7, 2011). Cancer Stats Key Facts, breast cancer. Available at: http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/prod-consump/groups/cr-common/ @nre/@sta/documents/generalcontent/crukmig-1000ast-2841.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2011.
3. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, et al. Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 2000; 215: 267-279.
4. Kriege M, Brakelmans CTM, Boetes C, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 427-437.
5. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society Guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 75-89.
6. Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98: 10869-10874.
7. Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 8418-8423.
8. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 228-247.
9. Manton DJ, Chaturvedi A, Hubbard A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: early response prediction with quantitative MR imaging and spectroscopy. Br J Cancer 2006; 94: 427-435.
10. Padhani AR,. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical oncology: current status and future directions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16: 407-422.
11. Cron G, Kelcz F, Santyr GE,. Improvement in breast lesion characterization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using pharmacokinetic modeling and bookend T1 measurements. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 1066-1070.
12. Lieberman L, Menell JH,. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40: 409-430.
13. Freeborough PA, Fox NC,. MR image texture analysis applied to the diagnosis and tracking of Alzheimer's disease. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17: 475-479.
14. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I,. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Syst Man Cybernet Soc 1973; 3: 610-621.
15. Kjaer L, Ring P, Thomsen C, Henriksen O,. Texture analysis in quantitative MR imaging: tissue characterization of normal brain and intracranial tumors at 1.5T. Acta Radiol 1995; 36; 127-135.
16. Lerski RA, Straughan K, Schad LR, Boyce D, Blumi S, Zuna I,. MR image texture analysis-an approach to tissue characterization. Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 11: 873-887.
17. Gibbs P, Turnbull LW,. Textural analysis of contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 92-98.
18. Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Debruhl ND, et al. Multifeature analysis of Gd-enhanced MR images of breast lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7; 1016-1026.
19. Chen W, Giger ML, Li H, Bick U, Newstead GM,. Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58; 562-571.
20. Bhooshan N, Giger ML, Jansen SA, Li H, Lan L, Newstead GM,. Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers. Radiology 2010; 254; 680-690.
21. Agner SC, Soman S, Libfeld E, et al. Textural kinetics: a novel dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI feature for breast lesion classification. J Digital Imaging 2011; 24; 446-463.
22. James D, Clymer BD, Schmalbrock P,. Texture detection of simulated microcalcification susceptibility effects in magnetic resonance imaging of breasts. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13: 876-881.
23. Kunz H, Derz C, Tolxdorff T, Bernarding J,. Feature extraction and supervised classification of MR images to support proton radiation therapy of eye tumors. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2004; 73: 195-202.
24. Mathias JM, Tofts PS, Losseff NA,. Texture analysis of spinal cord pathology in multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42: 929-935.
25. Mayerhoefer ME, Breitenseher MJ, Kramer J, Aigner N, Hofmann S, Materka A,. Texture analysis for tissue discrimination on T1-weighted MR images of the knee joint in a multicenter study: transferability of texture features and comparison of feature selection methods and classifiers. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22: 674-680.
26. Kovalev VA, Kruggel G, Gertz H, Cramon V,. Three dimensional texture analysis of MRI brain datasets. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20: 424-433.
27. Mahmoud-Ghoniem D, Toussaint G, Constans J, de Certaines JD,. Three dimensional texture analysis in MRI: a preliminary evaluation in gliomas. Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 21: 983-987.
28. Partridge SC, Gibbs JE, Lu Y, et al. MRI measurements of breast tumor volume predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence-free survival. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 1774-1781.
29. Otsu N,. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 1979; 9: 62-66.
30. Conners RW, Trivedi MM, Harlow CA,. Segmentation of a high-resolution urban scene using texture operators. Comput Vis Graph Image Process 1984; 25: 273-310.