One-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results with a Novel Hydrophilic Titanium Dental Implant

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 511-519

  Degasperi, Werner ^a,b   Andersson, Peter ^a,b   Verrocchi, Damiano ^b   Sennerby, Lars ^a,c  

^a Clinica Feltre   (Italy)

^b Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Institute of Odontology University of Gothenburg ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Clinical follow up study; Hydrophilic surface; Implant survival; ISQ; Marginal bone loss

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; IMMEDIATE DENTAL IMPLANT LOADING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 84944865889     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12022     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106:527-551.
2. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Brägger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15:625-642.
3. Laurell L, Lundgren D. Marginal bone level changes at dental implants after 5 years in function: a meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; 13:19-28.
4. Sennerby L, Roos J. Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11:408-420.
5. Sun HL, Huang C, Wu YR, Shi B. Failure rates of short (≤10mm) dental implants and factors influencing their failure: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26:816-825.
6. Del Fabbro M, Rosano G, Taschieri S. Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation. Eur J Oral Sci 2008; 116:497-506.
7. Ostman PO. Immediate/early loading of dental implants. Clinical documentation and presentation of a treatment concept. Periodontol 2000 2008; 47:90-112.
8. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20(Suppl 4):172-184.
9. Wennerberg A, Galli S, Albrektsson T. Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLActive surface. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2011; 3:59-67.
10. Pagliani L, Sennerby L, Anderson P, Verrocchi D, Meredith N. Insertion torque measurements during placement of Neoss implants. Appl Osseointegration Res 2008; 6:36-38.
11. Sennerby L, Gottlow J, Engman F, Meredith N. Histological and biomechanical aspects of surface topography and geometry of Neoss implants. A study in rabbits. Appl Osseointegration Res 2008; 6:8-22.
12. Sennerby L, Andersson P, Verrocchi D, Viinamäki R. One-year outcomes of Neoss bimodal implants. A prospective clinical, radiographic, and RFA study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14:313-320.
13. Zumstein T, Billström C, Sennerby L. A 4- to 5-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study of Neoss implants placed with or without GBR procedures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14:480-490.
14. Pagliani L, Andersson P, Lanza M, etal. A collagenated porcine bone substitute for augmentation at Neoss implant sites: a prospective 1-year multicenter case series study with histology. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14:746-758.
15. Dahlin C, Widmark G, Bergkvist G, Fürst B, Widbom T, Kashani H. One-year results of a clinical and radiological prospective multicenter study on NEOSS® dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00356.x
16. Volpe S, Lanza M, Verrocchi D, Sennerby L. Clinical outcomes of an osteotome technique and simultaneous placement of Neoss implants in the posterior maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00378.x
17. Becker W, Becker BE, Hujoel P, Abu Ras Z, Smidt A, Goldstein M. Prospective clinical trial evaluating a new implant system for implant survival, implant stability and radiographic bone changes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00333.x
18. Gotttlow J, Sennerby L. An experimental comparison of Neoss implants with either a double blasted or a blasted and acid-etched hydrophilic surface. In manuscript.
19. Zumstein T, Divitini N, Meredith N. A comparative retrospecitve follow up of patients treated with implants either with a blasted or super hydrophilic surface with or without an adjunctive GBR procedure. J Implant Adv Clin Dent 2011; 3:49-58.
20. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brånemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 1985:199-209.
21. Friberg B, Jemt T. Clinical experience of TiUnite implants: a 5-year cross-sectional, retrospective follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 12(Suppl 1):e95-103.
22. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 1 - review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17:536-543.
23. Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003; 67:932-949.
24. Park JY, Davies JE. Red blood cell and platelet interactions with titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11:530-539.
25. Le Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007; 23:844-854.
26. Rosen P, Meredith N, Reynolds M. Case reports describing the "bump": a new phenomenon in implant healing. J Implant Adv Clin Dent 2010; 2:27-37.
27. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000 2008; 47:51-66.
28. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28:297-303.