A Collagenated Porcine Bone Substitute for Augmentation at Neoss Implant Sites: A Prospective 1-Year Multicenter Case Series Study with Histology

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 746-758

  Pagliani, Luca ^a,b   Andersson, Peter ^a,b   Lanza, Massimiliano ^a,b   Nappo, Antonio ^c   Verrocchi, Damiano ^a,b   Volpe, Stefano ^a,d   Sennerby, Lars ^a,b,e  

^a Feltre/Fiera Di Primiero Implant Research Group   (Italy)

^b Private practice ^*  (Italy)

^c Private Practice   (Italy)

^d Private Practice in Orthodontics   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bone defects; Bone substitute; Clinical study; Dental implants; Histology; Maxillary sinus floor augmentation

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORAL SURGERY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; SWINE; TISSUE REGENERATION; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; ANIMALS; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; COLLAGEN; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FEMALE; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; HUMANS; MALE; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; SWINE;

EID: 84867086770     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00314.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. McAllister BS, Haghighat K. Bone augmentation techniques. J Periodontol 2007; 78:377-396.
2. Clavero J, Lundgren S. Ramus or chin grafts for maxillary sinus inlay and local onlay augmentation: comparison of donor site morbidity and complications. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5:154-160.
3. Cricchio G, Lundgren S. Donor site morbidity in two different approaches to anterior iliac crest bone harvesting. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5:161-169.
4. Hallman M, Thor A. Bone substitutes and growth factors as an alternative/complement to autogenous bone for grafting in implant dentistry. Periodontol 2000 2008; 47:172-192.
5. Handschel J, Sominowska M, Naujoks C, etal. A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials. Head Face Med 2009; 5:12.
6. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscence's and fenestrations: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20(Suppl 4):113-123.
7. Nkenke E, Stelzle F. Clinical outcomes of sinus floor augmnetation for implant placement using autogenous bone or bone substitutes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20(Suppl 4):124-133.
8. Hallman M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite or a 20:80 mixture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17:635-643.
9. Piattelli M, Favero GA, Scarano A, Orsini G, Piattelli A. Bone reactions to anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) used in sinus augmnetation procedures: a histologic long-term report of 20 cases in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14:835-840.
10. Schlegel AK, Dontah K. BIO-OSS-a resorbable bone substitute? J Long Term Eff Med Implants 1998; 8:201-209.
11. Wang LC, Takahashi I, Sasano Y, Sugawara J, Mitani H. Osteoclastogenic activity during mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Dent Res 2005; 84:1010-1015.
12. Nannmark U, Sennerby L. The bone tissue reposnes to prehydrated and collagenated cortico-cancellous porcine bone grafts: a study in rabbit maxillary defects. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008; 10:264-270.
13. Barone A, Ricci M, Covani U, Nannmark U, Azarmehr I, Calvo-Guirado JL. Maxillary sinus augmnetation using pre-hydrated cortico-cancellous porcine bone: histomorphometric evaluation after 6 months. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00274.x.
14. Orsini G, Scarano A, Piattelli M, Piccirilli M, Caputi S, Piattelli A. Histologic and ultrastructural analysis of regenerated bone in maxillary sinus augmentation using a porcine bone-derived biomaterial. J Periodontol 2006; 77:1984-1990.
15. Scarano A, Piattelli A, Perrotti V, Manzon L, Iezzi G. Maxillatry sinus augmentation in humnas using cortical porcine bone: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation after 4 and 6 months. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009.
16. Lundgren S, Andersson S, Gualini F, Sennerby L. Bone reformation with sinus membrane elevation: a new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004; 6:165-173.
17. Barone A, Aldini NN, Giardino R, Guirado JL, Covani U. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study. J Periodontol 2008; 79:1370-1377.
18. Crespi R, Cappare P, Gherlone E. Dental implants placed in extraction sites grafted with different bone substitutes: radiographic evaluation at 24 months. J Periodontol 2009; 80:1616-1621.
19. Barone A, Crespi R, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Covani U. Maxillary sinus augmnetation: histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20:519-525.
20. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency anaylysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000 2008; 47:51-66.
21. Vanden Bogaerde L, Pedretti G, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Immediate/early function of Neoss implants placed in maxillas and posterior mandible: an 18-month prospective case series study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008.
22. Sennerby L, Andersson A, Verrocchi D, Viinamäki R. One-year outcomes of Neoss Bimodal implants. A prospective, clinical, radiographic and RFA study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00273.x.
23. Zumstein T, Billström C, Sennerby L. A 4- to 5-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study of Neoss implants placed with or without GBR procedures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010.
24. Benic GI, Jung RE, Siegenthaler DW, Hämmerle CH. Clinical and radiographic comparison of implants in regenerated or native bone: 5-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:507-513.
25. Zitzmann NU, Schärer P, Marinello CP. Long-term results of implant treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16:355-366.
26. Jung RE, Hälg GA, Thoma DS, Hämmerle CH. A randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate a new membrane for guided bone regeneration around dental implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 2009; 20:162-168.
27. Urban IA, Jovanovic SA, Lozada JL. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study on 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24:502-510.
28. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Part 1: MLateral approach. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35(Suppl 8):216-240.
29. Hallman M, Hedin M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60:277-284.
30. Kim YK, Yun PY, Kim SG, Kim BS, Ong JL. Evaluation of sinus bone resorption and marginal bone loss after sinus bone grafting and implant placement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107:e21-e28.