The what, why, and how of born-open data

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 1062-1069

  Rouder, Jeffrey N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Data integrity; Data sharing; Open data; Open science

Indexed keywords

FACTUAL DATABASE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; PERSONNEL; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SOFTWARE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, FACTUAL; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84944704679     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0630-z     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bem, D. J. (2011). Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 407–425. doi:10.1037/a0021524.
2. Carpenter, S. (2012). Psychology’s bold initiative. Science, 335, 1558–1561.
3. Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29.
4. Kahneman, D. J. (2012). Open Letter: A proposal to deal with questions about priming effects.
5. Klein, M., Van de Sompel, H., Sanderson, R., Shankar, H., Balakireva, L., Zhou, K., & Tobin, R. (2014). Scholarly context not found: One in five articles suffers from reference rot. PLoS One, 9, e115253.
6. Krawczyk, M., & Reuben, E. (2012). (Un) available upon request: field experiment on researchers’ willingness to share supplementary materials. Accountability in Research, 19, 175–186.
7. Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Wagenmakers, E. J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2014). An agenda for open research: Incentivising open research practices through peer review. http://agendaforopenresearch.org/agenda10.pdf
8. Morey, R. D., Romeijn, J. W., & Rouder, J. N. (2013). The humble Bayesian: Model checking from a fully Bayesian perspective. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66, 68–75. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02067.x.
9. Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 615–631.
10. Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 528– 530.
11. Punewska, M. (2014). Scientists have a sharing problem. The Atlantic Monthly. Available from http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/12/scientists-have-a-sharing-problem/383061/
12. Roediger, H. L. (2012). Psychology’s woes and a partial cure: The value of replication. APS Observer, 25.
13. Storm, L., Tressoldi, P. E., & Di Risio, L. (2010). Meta-analysis of free-response studies, 1992-2008: Assessing the noise reduction model in parapsychology. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 471–485. doi:10.1037/a0019457.
14. Vines, T. H. e. a. (2014). The availability of research data declines rapidly with article age. Current Biology, 24, 94–97.
15. Wicherts, J. M. (2013). Science revolves around the data. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 1(1). http://openpsychologydata.metajnl.com/article/view/jopd.e1.
16. Wicherts, J. M., & Bakker, M. (2012). Publish (your data) or (let the data) perish! Why not publish your data too? Intelligence, 40(2), 73–76. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289612000050.
17. Wicherts, J. M., Bakker, M., & Molenaar, D. (2011). Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results. PLoS ONE, 6(11), e26828. http://www.plosone.org/annotation/listThread.action?root=19627.
18. Wicherts, J. M., Borsboom, D., Kats, J., & Molenaar, D. (2006). The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. American Psychologist, 61(7), 726–728. http://wicherts.socsci.uva.nl/datasharing.pdf.
19. Yong, E. (2012). Replication studies: Bad copy. Nature, 485, 298–300.