(Un)Available upon Request: Field Experiment on Researchers' Willingness to Share Supplementary Materials

Accountability in Research

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 175-186

  Krawczyk, Michal ^a   Reuben, Ernesto ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^b The Sanford C Bernstein Co Center for Leadership and Ethics   (United States)

Author keywords

data sharing; field experiment

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; COOPERATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PERSONNEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC RELATIONS;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; RESEARCH PERSONNEL;

EID: 84862498308     PISSN: 08989621     EISSN: 15455815     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2012.678688     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Dewald, W.G., Thursby, J.G. and Anderson, R.G. 1986. Replication in empirical economics: The journal of money, credit and banking project. The American Economic Review, 76(4): 587-603.
2. Feigenbaum, S. and Levy, D.M. 1993. The market for (ir) reproducible econometrics. Accountability in Research, 3(1): 25-43.
3. Fischer, B.A. and Zigmond, M.J. 2010. The essential nature of sharing in science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(4): 783-799.
4. Freese, J. 2007. Replication standards for quantitative social science. Sociological Methods and Research, 36(2): 153-172.
5. Glänzel, W. and Schubert, A. 2005. "Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship". In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Edited by: Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W. and Schmoch, U. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
6. Kirwan, J.R. 1997. Making original data from clinical studies available for alternative analysis. The Journal of Rheumatology, 24(5): 822
7. McCullough, B.D. and Vinod, H.D. 2003. Verifying the solution from a non-linear solver: A case study. The American Economic Review, 93(3): 873-892.
8. McCullough, B.D., McGeary, K.A. and Harrison, T.D. 2008. Do economics journal archives promote replicable research?. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'economique, 41(4): 1406-1420.
9. McCullough, B.D., Harrison, T.D. and McGeary, K.A. 2006. Lessons from the JMCB archive. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 38(4): 1093-1107.
10. Savage, C.J. and Vickers, A.J. 2009. Empirical study of data sharing by authors publishing in PLoS journals. PloS One, 4(9): 70-78.
11. Smith, E. 2011. The limits of sharing: An ethical analysis of the arguments for and against the sharing of databases and material banks. Accountability in Research, 18(6): 357-381.
12. Trimble, V. and Ceja, J.A. 2011. Are American astrophysics papers accepted more quickly than others?. Scientometrics, 89(1): 281-289.
13. Wicherts, J.M., Borsboom, D., Kats, J. and Molenaar, D. 2006. The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. American Psychologist, 61(7): 726
14. Wicherts, J.M., Bakker, M. and Molenaar, D. 2011. Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results. PLoS One, 6(11): e26828